Channel
@directam_ir
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,459subscribers
-48,205 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001927813999 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @directam_ir |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/directam_ir |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
5,600 average views per post against 1,459 subscribers — an engagement rate of 383.5%. Across the 775 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,001–3,156 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 7.20% and 30.6%, with a median of 16.7%.
| Window | 30 days (6 September 2026 – 6 October 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 71 of 71 published in the window (0 exact, 71 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 397,250 |
| Mature posts only | 383.5% over 71 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 1,459 measured 5 October 2026 |
| Cohort | b1000:fas · 775 channels · p10 3.57% · p25 7.20% · p50 16.7% · p75 30.6% · p90 55.4% |
| Position in cohort | 99.225th percentile · 22.9× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.2% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Persian · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 6 October 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Oct 2026, 07:54 | 1,459 | +114 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 00:56 | 1,345 | -54,437 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 13:01 | 55,782 | +1,042 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 12:36 | 54,740 | +2,593 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:21 | 52,147 | +162 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:21 | 51,985 | +191 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 02:57 | 51,794 | +338 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:57 | 51,456 | +321 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 05:59 | 51,135 | +79 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:19 | 51,056 | +91 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:13 | 50,965 | +81 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:08 | 50,884 | +136 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:06 | 50,748 | +65 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:28 | 50,683 | +79 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 50,604 | +51 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 50,553 | +64 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 50,489 | +81 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 50,408 | +56 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:22 | 50,352 | +72 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:37 | 50,280 | first reading |
178 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 104 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 65 of 71 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 178 (30 July 2026 – 24 September 2026) |
| Views total | 397,250 |
| Reactions total | 6,673 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 05:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7,082 reactions across 128 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤯 | 5,333 | 75.3% | |
| ❤ | 1,087 | 15.3% | |
| 👍 | 181 | 2.56% | |
| 😍 | 152 | 2.15% | |
| 👏 | 88 | 1.24% | |
| 🫡 | 81 | 1.14% | |
| 🔥 | 57 | 0.805% | |
| ✍ | 37 | 0.522% | |
| 👎 | 37 | 0.522% | |
| 👌 | 13 | 0.184% | |
| 🙏 | 11 | 0.155% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 0.042% | |
| 😘 | 1 | 0.014% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.014% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 128 of the 178 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,082 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 178 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @directam_ir. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 178 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 24 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔥اگه تا امروز از دایرکتم استفاده نکردی، الان بهترین فرصته که بدون پرداخت هزینه (صفر تومان) ۱۴ روز تستش کنی! 🎁 تو این ۱۴ روز فرصت برای تست رایگان دایرکتم میتونی: ✅ جواب دایرکتها و کامنتها رو خودکار بدی. ✅ برای هر تعداد پست که میخوای، قابلیتهای دایرکتم رو فعال کنی. ✅ با ویترینساز دایرکتم، عکس و اطلاعات محصولات یا خدماتت رو دستهبندی کنی و بهصورت خودکار برای مشتریهات بفرستی. ✅ با فرمساز دایرکتم، شماره و اطلاعا…
❤9
#تجربه_شما 🩷 از جذب مخاطبهای جدید تا گرفتن پروژههای بیشتر و گسترش تیم؛ خوشحالیم که دایرکتم بخشی از مسیر رشد شما بوده.
❤5👏4🤯2
آخر هفتهست؛ شما کنار خانوادهتون باشید و از لحظههاتون لذت ببرید 💜 دایرکتم حواسش به پاسخگویی و فروش پیجتون هست.
❤11🤯4
چرا بعضی از مخاطبها میگن جوابی براشون ارسال نشده؟
❤6👍3
⚠️ هشدار! حساسیتهای اینستاگرام برای ارسال لینک در دایرکت این ویدیو رو با دقت نگاه کنید!
❤4👍2🫡2
همراهان گرامی دایرکتم ⚠️ الگوریتم اینستاگرام بهطور مستمر بهروزرسانی میشود. 🎥 لطفا برای آشنایی با نکات مهم این تغییرات و استفاده بهتر از سرویس دایرکتم، ویدیوهای زیر را با دقت تماشا کنید.
✍7
💬 تیم مشاوره دایرکتم هر روز از ساعت ۹ صبح تا ۲۲ آمادهست تا به سؤالهاتون پاسخ بده و شما رو راهنمایی کنه. 🔍 دغدغهها و نیازهای کسبوکارتون رو بررسی میکنیم و بهتون میگیم چطور با تهیه سرویس دایرکتم، فعالیت حرفهایتری در اینستاگرام داشته باشید و کسبوکارتون رو توسعه بدید. 🚀 برای دریافت مشاوره رایگان و تهیه اشتراک دایرکتم با تخفیف ویژه اینجا پیام بدید: @directam_sale
❤4
توی این ویس بهت گفتیم چطور خیال مشتری رو راحتتر کنی تا با اطمینان بیشتری خرید کنه. ✅
❤8✍1
💡 نکته امروز! ⚠️ با این شرایط اقتصادی و بودجه محدود، مشتری میخواد مطمئن بشه پولش رو جای درستی خرج میکنه و چیزی که میخره واقعاً به کارش میاد. 💭 یکی از نگرانیهاش قبل از خرید اینه: «اگه بخرم و اونی نباشه که انتظار دارم چی؟»
👍5❤1
🍂 اولین روز پاییز مبارک برای هر کسبوکاری که با تلاش و امید سر پا مونده، آرزو میکنیم این فصل پر از فرصتهای تازه و نتیجههای خوب باشه. امیدواریم پاییز امسال، فصل بهثمر رسیدن زحمتهاتون باشه. 🩷
❤28😍5🤯2
تیم مشاوره دایرکتم کنارته تا با توجه به شرایط پیجت، بهت بگه دایرکتم چطور میتونه به کسبوکارت کمک کنه 👇 🛍• اگر پیج فروشگاهی یا خدماتی داری، بهت میگیم دایرکتم چطور میتونه محصولات و خدماتت رو به مشتری معرفی کنه و خرید رو براش راحتتر کنه. 📩• اگر دایرکت داری ولی فروش نه، بهت میگیم دایرکتم چطور میتونه با پاسخگویی و پیگیری مشتریها، به فروشت کمک کنه. 🚀• اگر تازه شروع کردی، بهت میگیم دایرکتم چطور میتونه از همین او…
❤2🤯2
خوشحالیم که دایرکتم تونسته به رشد و فروش کسبوکارهای اینستاگرامی کمک کنه 🩷
👏5🤯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 178 posts we hold for @directam_ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@directam_ir edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
تا حالا فکر کردی دایرکتم روزانه به چندتا پیام پاسخ میده؟
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
این چند روز تعطیلی برنامهاتون چیه؟
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
از بین کامنتهایی که زیر پستهات میذارن، چند نفر در نهایت ازت خرید میکنن؟ 🤔
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 178 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 24 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دایرکتم” (@directam_ir), 1,459 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/directam_ir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.