Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 37% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 63 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
67 measurements spanning 101 days, net -9,098. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,761–27,774 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 67
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Nov 2026, 19:09
16,262
-169
11 Nov 2026, 16:47
16,431
-68
9 Nov 2026, 20:54
16,499
-19
8 Nov 2026, 14:59
16,518
-10
7 Nov 2026, 11:47
16,528
-9
6 Nov 2026, 08:40
16,537
-12
5 Nov 2026, 10:40
16,549
-15
4 Nov 2026, 07:38
16,564
-15
3 Nov 2026, 09:18
16,579
-6
2 Nov 2026, 12:40
16,585
-35
1 Nov 2026, 12:29
16,620
-60
31 Oct 2026, 13:06
16,680
-18
30 Oct 2026, 15:40
16,698
-31
29 Oct 2026, 14:39
16,729
-101
28 Oct 2026, 11:31
16,830
-161
27 Oct 2026, 09:46
16,991
-12
26 Oct 2026, 12:31
17,003
-21
25 Oct 2026, 13:16
17,024
-39
24 Oct 2026, 09:48
17,063
-22
23 Oct 2026, 11:55
17,085
first reading
Engagement
86 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 81 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.1%
avg views ÷ 16,262 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,610
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.873%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 86 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
86 (4 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
26,131
Reactions total
228
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Nov 2026, 18:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
13m 27s
Average length
37s
Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,909 reactions across 72 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,111
58.2%
🔥
186
9.74%
❤🔥
127
6.65%
🥰
113
5.92%
🍓
111
5.81%
custom 5226711870492126219
97
5.08%
🐳
24
1.26%
🤩
24
1.26%
🗿
17
0.891%
😍
17
0.891%
😭
16
0.838%
🦄
16
0.838%
😁
14
0.733%
🕊
10
0.524%
👏
8
0.419%
🤝
5
0.262%
🤔
4
0.21%
🌚
3
0.157%
🍾
3
0.157%
🤗
3
0.157%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 86 of the 86 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,119 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 86 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 10 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
💫💫💫💫💫💫💫💫💫
Сбер прошел путь от сберегательных книжек до целой экосистемы, которая помогает миллионам людей в разные моменты жизни — будь то планирование свадебного путешествия, первые накопления карманных денег или покупка билетов на фестиваль.
И Пикник Афиши рад быть частью этой истории — признаваться в любви музыке, проводить вместе лучшие дни лета и, конечно, объединять близких людей. Тех, кто доверяет нам свои м…
Сколько четырехлистных клеверов можно найти в «Коломенском» или на Елагином острове? Достаточно, чтобы принести кому-то удачу 🍀
Напоминаем, что на этой неделе вы можете купить входной билет на Пикник Афиши и принять участие в розыгрыше.
Случайным образом мы выберем среди покупателей пять счастливчиков, которых отправим в вип-зону. Подробнее читайте в этом посте, а за билетами заходите на picnic.afisha.ru
Пока ждем…
Несколько новых релизов прошедшей недели:
• Сироткин — Амур
Песня о будущем, проникнутая не тревогой перед неизведанным, а готовностью идти к нему навстречу вдвоем.
• Источник — Когда? (Госпел)
Новая интерпретация хита гитарной эра «Источника», которая войдет в будущий EP переработок, записанных при участии хора.
• Евтела & Mirèle — Люди устали без любви
Осень — лучшее время для поиска любви не только в людях, но…
Кого вы хотите услышать на Пикнике Афиши?
Уже традиционно хотим узнать ваше мнение — собираем идеи для следующего фестиваля.
Критерия всего два: выступление артиста в России возможно в нашей версии мультивселенной и вы очень хотите услышать его на Пикнике. Жанр и масштаб известности роли не играют.
Оставляйте свои пожелания в комментариях и ставьте реакции на те, с которыми согласны:
Вы покупаете обычный билет на Пикник — мы превращаем его в вип
Случайным образом выберем пять счастливчиков, которых отправим в вип-зону с лучшим видом на сцену и другими бонусами красивой жизни.
Как принять участие?
→ Купите билет на Пикник Афиши 2027 в Москве или Петербурге
→ При покупке выберите акцию «Хочу выиграть VIP-билет»
→ 19 ноября проверьте почту, с которой покупали билет
А если у меня уже есть билет?
В…
Несколько новых релизов прошедшей недели:
• Gone.Fludd — Код Гиас
В одноименном аниме Гиас — это сверхспособность, позволяющая влиять на людей и исполнять желания ее обладателя. А теперь — еще и прыгучий трек с заедающей мелодией.
• Slava Marlow, Gazan, Кобяков, Toly Summer, Вова Солодков — Ты горишь как огонь 2
Если вы скучали по старой эре творчества Славы — для вас обновленная версия «Ты горишь как огонь» в испо…
Несколько новых релизов прошедшей недели:
• Бонд с кнопкой — Боязно
Вторая часть диптиха с хором из 350 человек: «Если в "Катастрофах" количеством людей хотелось убедить, что все будет хорошо — громко, яростно, то в "Боязно" хочется успокоить».
• Arustamov, Mayot — Слишком плохой
Танцевальный трек, который на три минуты переносит обратно в лето.
• J. Rouh — Не дают летать
Иногда песня просто ждет своего времени. Э…
Из планов — дата и место, а счастливые случайности, внезапные влюбленности и спонтанные встречи найдут вас сами.
19 июня — Москва — Музей-заповедник «Коломенское»
7 августа — Санкт-Петербург — Елагин остров
Билет в один из лучших дней лета: picnic.afisha.ru
Луна-парк Пикника Афиши — это оркестр на входе, ходулисты в толпе зрителей, фантазийный декор, который напоминает то ли о ретро-анимации, то ли о сказках, и небывалые персонажи, которые зовут за собой в кроличью нору.
Это американские горки на главной сцене, это сияющие Тучные Дамы, это яркие фотографии на память.
Это любовь с первого взгляда.
Несколько месяцев подготовки + несколько недель репетиций + еще пара часов грима = один из лучших вечеров вашего лета
FEDUK специально для Пикника Афиши 2026.
Фото: katyakatarsis
❤20❤🔥12custom 52267118704921262198🗿2
Showing the 12 most recent of 86 posts we hold for @picnic_afishy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@picnic_afishy edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 79 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Афиша @afisha · 142,715 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
Афиша Daily @afishadaily · 70,929 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
Поладим с LADA @lada_rf · 57,210 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 23 August 2026
Сломанные пляски @brokendance · 79,646 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
Афиша Рестораны @afisharestaurants · 49,303 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пикник Афиши” (@picnic_afishy), 16,262 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/picnic_afishy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
