Channel
@cnryk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,881subscribers
-27 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003850645858 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cnryk |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cnryk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:42 | 1,881 | -8 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 1,889 | -21 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 1,910 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 1,908 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:06 | 1,908 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (1 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 13,836 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😁😁😁😁😁😁😁 😃😃😃😃 😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😍😘🥰😍😘🥰😍😘🥰😍😘🥰 😀 《麻将胡了2》再现封神时刻！ 😄 神秘大哥 😁😁 😀 🤤强势入场， 😄 一举狂爆 🥹😀😆 😀 🤤， 😄 折合人民币高达 😁😗😁😄 😀！ 😄 小平台怕你赢， 😄 G7怕你胃口不够大！ 😄 千万巨款链上转账， 🪙 5分钟干净利落到账！ 😄 真实提币图在此， 😄 实力不需要解释。 😄 财富风暴已蓄力。 😄 来G7，等你打破纪录！ 😆😁😄😃😀：@w777 —————————————————— 😀 G7环球 #福利频道 😄 大事件 体育馆 吃瓜偷拍 商家群 小说区 无码传媒 —————————————————— 😄注册网址：G7.com【USDT】 😄注册网址：G7.com【人民币】 —————————————————— ☺️☺️😚😄😙😗😙😉🙂😊 😄😃😃😀😀：G7.com 😀😃😄😁😁：@G7kf 😆😁😄😃😀：@wwwG
#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 🔞抖音快手网红反差 | 18+ 主播自拍露出 📢 人妻反差淑女乱伦 📢 SM母狗调教 📢 少妇人妻 📢 【Ai短剧】小夫魔改Ai成人短剧🌹 📢 日本精品典藏💟中文字幕💟精品AV 📢 男m 资源分享🔒 m男 💗 📢 JAV中文无码剧情 | 日本AV女优 18+ 📢 onlyfans推特分享 📢 郑州娃娃体验馆 ------------------------------ ☁️ 互推入口：@sooo
频道适合看内容，群组更适合继续交流。 SOSO 可以直接找热门群组，也能按关键词搜同类圈子。 先打开看看当前推荐。
刷到一个频道后，通常还想找更多同类入口。 SOSO 精选频道会随机推荐一批已收录频道。 适合继续发现相近内容。
越漂亮的女人越骚这句话的含金量还在上升 #91porn-今日排行
❤1
反差骚狗狗上位露脸，别让龟龟看见 #91porn-今日排行
在商场搭讪的肥臀熟女，昨晚拿下，干了三炮，内射！ #91porn-今日排行
给博士骚妻找黑屌单男 怎么感觉他们才是一对(看剪借 #91porn-今日排行
小姨子勾姐夫 竟在商场厕所猛嗦鸡巴 工地宿舍爆操内射骚穴 #91porn-今日排行
广东绿帽聚会，陌生男人3P露脸内射了淫妻，很刺激！ #91porn-今日排行
他抱着老婆狠狠冲刺，在身体最敏感的时候，在骚逼最深处喷涌内射 #91porn-今日排行
真实自拍拿去撸 #91porn-今日排行
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @cnryk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 7,175 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 96 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“成年人影库｜高清资源每日更新” (@cnryk), 1,881 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cnryk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.