Channel
@chiguasucai
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,250subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001588706158 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chiguasucai |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chiguasucai |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:27 | 12,250 | +4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:26 | 12,246 | +10 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 12,236 | -9 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:58 | 12,245 | +12 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 12,233 | -25 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:27 | 12,258 | +12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 12,246 | +5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:41 | 12,241 | -13 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 12,254 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:51 | 12,260 | +14 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 12,246 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:26 | 12,246 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 19 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
128 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 61 | 47.7% | |
| 👍 | 46 | 35.9% | |
| 🤮 | 13 | 10.2% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 3.91% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.781% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.781% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 0.781% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 19 December 2024 to 28 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 8 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 30 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
喜剧明星 谈论 春晚 节目 审查： 赵本山 ： 动不动被毙 陈佩斯 ： 都是 北京爷 托太多 郭德纲 ： 不懂屁事多
❤12👍5🎉2👏1
🧐 真拿彭于晏没办法 😕
❤7👍6🎉2
18日晚 广东 深圳 网友爆料：电动车 疑似被 泼油，与店家沟通时遭遇不愉快，随后网友将视频发到了网上。据说店铺增加了数千条 差评 然后，就没有然后了
❤12👍4🎉1
#秦皇岛 #精神小妹 #裸奔 河北秦皇岛精神小妹与人吵架 气急败坏疯狂的骂自己“对，我就是骚逼”，还脱裤子露逼让对方来操！牛逼666
❤19👍18🥱1😱1
12.18（发布）江西 赣州 母女 在公园散步被四条狗攻击撕咬，扯下来的肉被吃掉，暴露性伤口可以塞进一只手 #狗咬人
❤6👍4
王慧玲 曾劝农村女性别轻易结婚 400万粉丝的 #网红 王慧玲 长期 发布 各种逆天言论 搞 男女对立 蛊惑国内女女性不要走进婚姻，而她自己却嫁给了一个英国佬生儿育女…… 这种烂逼货是真的缺德带冒烟了
🤮13👍9❤5
叫暖杷是不是就不擦边了？
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @chiguasucai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 875,849 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“吃瓜丨素材丨内涵段子丨搞笑视频” (@chiguasucai), 12,250 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chiguasucai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.