Channel
@chiguak
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
39,899subscribers
-28,220 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002035889505 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chiguak |
| Description | 👉聚焦东南亚热点事件、国际新闻、社会动态、华人关注资讯，第一时间更新柬埔寨、斯里兰卡、缅甸、迪拜、泰国、越南、老挝等地区消息 东南亚大事件 @kk777 东南亚吃瓜群 @kk999 东南亚素材库 @zhaopian |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chiguak |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 28% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 6 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 9 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @yuenanE/169436 Aug 2026, 13:26 UTC | @chiguak/70610 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 13:26 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @yuenanE/169556 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC | @chiguak/70622 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @yuenanE/169576 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC | @chiguak/70624 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @yuenanE/169586 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC | @chiguak/70625 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @yuenanE/169656 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC | @chiguak/70632 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @yuenanE/170897 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC | @chiguak/70756 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @yuenanE | 22 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (21–1) |
| @xigangz | 22 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @xigangz (21–1) |
| @Bx666x | 22 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 72 seconds | @Bx666x (19–3) |
| @yuenanU | 18 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (15–3) |
| @jinbiany | 18 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (18–0) |
| @miandianQ | 17 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @miandianQ (13–4) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 57 of the 57 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 36 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 9, the earliest publisher we hold is @miandianQ. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 8 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 02:02 | 39,899 | -1,125 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 20:40 | 41,024 | -435 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 14:18 | 41,459 | -686 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:02 | 42,145 | -1,774 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:21 | 43,919 | -2,753 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 46,672 | -787 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 03:18 | 47,459 | -1,040 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 22:58 | 48,499 | -311 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:13 | 48,810 | -425 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:03 | 49,235 | -316 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:07 | 49,551 | -188 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 49,739 | -378 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:54 | 50,117 | -380 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:23 | 50,497 | -657 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:56 | 51,154 | -652 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 51,806 | -3,614 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 55,420 | -353 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 55,773 | -440 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 56,213 | -442 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 56,655 | first reading |
1,220 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 98 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 691 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,220 (6 August 2026 – 27 September 2026) |
| Views total | 34,233 |
| Reactions total | 9 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 04:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 404 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
12 reactions across 12 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 14 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
网友投稿：昨天，西港老牌超市蓝天国际商城清仓大甩卖，进行战略性调整，也算得上一个标志性事件～～经营多年的老牌商家给西港更惨淡的未来投下了一票。网友投稿：昨天，西港老牌超市蓝天国际商城清仓大甩卖，进行战略性调整，也算得上一个标志性事件～～经营多年的老牌商家给西港更惨淡的未来投下了一票。 频道独家广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😎😎😎😎😎 😎😎😎😎储备金3亿U 大胆创 上押担保300万美金 ——————————————— 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清爆料: @idid
#泰国新闻 当局无力应对年年洪灾，民众只剩祈祷 曼谷因暴雨持续，多地年年反复发生内涝，但相关负责人未能采取有效防范措施，民众的不满与失望情绪不断高涨。 目前，包括拉差达披色路、明武里、Lat Krabang 及东部路段在内的超过15个地点发生内涝，车辆通行几乎瘫痪，交通仍十分困难。 “如果当局已无力防范年年遭遇的洪灾，那留给民众的就只剩祈祷了。”民众的这类批评声音，再次凸显了城市管理和排水系统的薄弱。 菩萨 : 我要是有这个能力保佑你们，我就不用被泡在水里了。😭 频道独家广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😎😎😎😎😎 😎😎😎😎储备金3亿U 大胆创 上押担保300万美金 ——————————————— 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清爆料: @idid
🤣😂😂😅😝😜😜😆😆😆😝😝😝😜 😺斥资10亿美金携手🫠😁🥹🤣强强联运 😺🤣😂😆🥹😂😄😁😂🥹😆🤣😄😁 #西湖娱乐城（信誉综合盘）❗️巨额出款无忧❗️全球最大的顶级华人博彩平台❗️ 🥱 汇聚市面所有主流博彩游戏 😢😮🤬🤐😽👺😑😮💨😭🫡🥹😆🤣😄 😁🤣😆😁😁😁😁🫥😑😶🥱😷🤢 🥴 平台支持🤯💀😽🤕 存取 😙 东南亚国家地区 不限ip 免实名 东南亚盘总首选平台（无需绑卡和手机号） 😇新用户首存金额达到对应档位，即可领取丰厚彩金！全自动到账 体验更佳 🥵首存送 复存送 投注送 还有豪车嫩模空降等你来拿 ！ 😹神秘彩金大奖🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔财富新贵就是你！ 🥱 西港某园区主管 澳门六合彩单挑特码三万中奖144万 🥱 泰国灰产大佬 4000一拉进关爆500倍 提款200万 🥱 柬埔寨大盘总 麻将胡了 爆分单笔提款386万 财务秒出款 🤔官方客服: @xihuBET6 🤔代理专员： @xihuBET8 🤔官方频道： @xi
#群友吐槽： 这两个逼养的玩仙人跳 找了一个15岁的女孩说一起玩 然后说给我安排。 我就给这两个逼开了一个房间。 那个女孩就在我房间。 各种暗示我。然后我干完了后。马上就有人敲门了。然后这个女的跑的很快就去把门打开了。 然后就气冲冲的冲进来三个男的说我干她女朋友。然后就敲诈我。还录视频。我本来不想射里面的。这个逼养的女的我要射的时候抱的很紧。后面才发觉是想留下证据好敲诈我。 他们应该玩仙人跳很久了。 带头的就是这个郑斌斌。我现在有点担心这女的有没有病。估计也敲诈过老头。 PS：就当嫖个娼吧~~~都无套内射了 多多少少还是要给点打胎费的 频道独家广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😎😎😎😎😎 😎😎😎😎储备金3亿U 大胆创 上押担保300万美金 ——————————————— 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清爆料: @idi
网友投稿：金三角特区金元宝3栋“华星公寓”，刚刚老挝警察和中国警察联合执法，直接冲进公寓抓人，附近的兄弟都注意一下！ 频道独家广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😎😎😎😎😎 😎😎😎😎储备金3亿U 大胆创 上押担保300万美金 ——————————————— 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清爆料: @idid
#网友投稿西港一女子从8楼跳下 奇迹生还！ 今（26日）晚11时40分，西港一名女子从8楼一跃而下，跌落在一栋私人住宅的铁皮屋顶上，奇迹幸存，就问你们牛逼不牛逼，硬不硬！ ps：不知道有没有把她摔醒 频道独家广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😎😎😎😎😎 😎😎😎😎储备金3亿U 大胆创 上押担保300万美金 ——————————————— 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清爆料: @idid
在迪拜的你，头发还浓密吗 ‘ 正确做法 别喝水龙头的水，要喝瓶装水，做饭也用桶装水，洗完头用桶装水冲洗头以后几乎就不怎么掉发了 频道独家广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😎😎😎😎😎 😎😎😎😎储备金3亿U 大胆创 上押担保300万美金 ——————————————— 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清爆料: @idid
#网友曝光 #傅钰博 千万网红，抖音，老白不喝酒，(白小贱)，真名 傅钰博，联合东南亚诈骗集团，开设线上赌场，炸粉丝钱。 在国内，被抓陕西省渭南市潼关县公安冲到杭州，抓回陕西省。本人找关系，花了100万的钱，花钱把他救出来，结果他在警察局门口说，给把他放出来的，闹事，迫于压力，我将100万退还了80万，其中20万是律师费用，签合同，所以并没有退。然后各种侮辱我。后来，在泰国，被我抓到，我打了他，出了气。他说他不会报警，不会找我麻烦，和我的事情从此结束了解。结果我走了以后，他马上报警，并且给钱，让警察找我，属实是小人行为。现在，我代表CNC武装负责人，宣布对此事负责。我只希望，他的所有犯罪能够得到该有的惩罚。他得到他该有的惩罚时，我也会主动回国，为我犯的错买单。当别人钻了法律的漏洞时，只能用最原始的方式，让他得到惩罚 频道独家广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😎😎😎😎😎 😎😎😎😎储备金3亿U 大胆创 上押担保300…
巴基斯坦：NCCIA已查22处非法呼叫中心，180多人被捕 9月26日，NCCIA Karachi Additional Director Tariq Nawaz接受SAMAA TV采访时表示，近期针对卡拉奇非法呼叫中心持续展开打击 目前已对22处非法呼叫中心采取行动，连同负责人在内共抓获180多名本地及外国籍人员； NCCIA称，针对市内其他涉嫌非法经营的呼叫中心，新一轮突击行动也将很快展开。目前180余名被捕人员的具体国籍构成、涉华人数、各案件地点及涉嫌诈骗模式尚未完整披露，暂不猜测。 频道独家广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😎😎😎😎😎 😎😎😎😎储备金3亿U 大胆创 上押担保300万美金 ——————————————— 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清爆料: @idid
西港一女子从8楼跳下，落在民房屋顶奇迹生还！ 网友投稿：今（26日）晚11时40分，西港一名女子从8楼一跃而下，所幸落在一栋私人住宅的铁皮屋顶上，奇迹幸存，就问你们牛逼不牛逼，硬不硬！ 频道独家广告赞助商 ——————————————— 😎😎😎😎😎 😎😎😎😎储备金3亿U 大胆创 上押担保300万美金 ——————————————— 👉东南亚大事件: @kk888 👉东南亚吃瓜群: @kk999 👉东南亚素材库: @zhaopian 👉投稿澄清爆料: @idid
网友投稿：曝光缅东妙瓦底御龙湾11排2栋 主管“橙子”的丑恶嘴脸！ 橙子身为主管，不仅完全没有尽到任何管理责任与义务，更是把剥削和欺压组员做到了极致！ 每次发提成，他都毫无底线地克扣组员的血汗钱，明目张胆地把大家拼命换来的薪水私吞入自己的口袋。 真当我们大家是傻子、什么都不知道吗？ 天天在外面吹牛逼说自己赚了几百上千万，原来你的每一分财富，全都是踩在我们身上吸血抽干换来的！ 你就是整个公司里最无耻、最傻逼的那个人！ 更让人无法忍受的是，我们底层组员每天在高压下高强度工作 15 个小时以上，身心俱疲，而他作为主管，连四分之一的上班时间都凑不够！ 天天彻底脱岗，躲在房间里沉迷享乐、玩弄不同的女人，对公司的日常管理和组员的死活不管不问。 甚至为了掩盖自己的无能与贪婪，还在组内疯狂搞立威、拉踩组员，导致整个部门人心惶惶，大家不仅拿不到应得的报酬，连基本的人格尊严都遭受践踏！ 要想人不知，除非己莫为！ 纸永远保不住火，…
双胞胎妈妈分娩时离世，阿联酋数百陌生人赶来送别：“整个阿联酋成了她的家人” 一名女子在分娩双胞胎时不幸离世，留下刚出生的两个孩子和丈夫。随后，一则号召居民参加其葬礼的消息在社交媒体上传开，数百名来自阿联酋各地、素不相识的人最终赶来为她送别。 死者是苏丹籍居民玛尔瓦（Marwa）。她的朋友阿雅（Aya）表示，家人完全没有想到，会得到社区如此巨大的支持。“祈祷大厅里挤满了人，有些人甚至只能在外面祈祷。” “大家从不同的酋长国赶来，很多人都是看了新闻以后过来的。我们真的觉得玛尔瓦非常有福气，整个阿联酋都成了她的家人。” 当天晡礼结束后，前往迪拜古赛斯公墓清真寺（Al Qusais Cemetery Mosque）的道路出现严重拥堵。 不少车辆停在E11高速公路一侧，人们步行前往清真寺参加葬礼祈祷。 即使祈祷结束1个小时后，仍不断有人来到墓地和清真寺表达哀悼。 “看到消息后，我觉得自己一定要来” 来自叙利亚的居民玛尔瓦·穆罕默德…
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,220 posts we hold for @chiguak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“迪拜新闻 迪拜大事件 马来西亚大事件” (@chiguak), 39,899 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chiguak.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.