Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 吃瓜猎奇 幽默视频 搞笑段子

Channel

吃瓜猎奇 幽默视频 搞笑段子

@ay2028

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

65,483subscribers

-24,288 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001726987376
TypeChannel
Username@ay2028
Description笑一笑,十年少。 商务联系 @KuaiTuiGuang 中文导航搜索群👉 @TGDH5 采集电报上所有高质量群组,频道内的资源。想找什么资源,就搜索对应的关键字,比如想要中文包,就在群里搜索关键词 “汉化”或者“中文包”
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ay2028

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 4 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@chigua6680/5891112 Aug 2026, 18:57 UTC@ay2028/39018 · this entry13 Aug 2026, 05:47 UTC1.0011 hours
@chigua6680/6497012 Oct 2026, 08:23 UTC@ay2028/40547 · this entry15 Oct 2026, 06:23 UTC1.003 days
@chigua6680/6611325 Oct 2026, 06:07 UTC@ay2028/40713 · this entry25 Oct 2026, 06:31 UTC1.0024 minutes
@chigua6680/6611525 Oct 2026, 06:13 UTC@ay2028/40721 · this entry25 Oct 2026, 06:31 UTC1.0019 minutes
@chigua6680/6611725 Oct 2026, 06:19 UTC@ay2028/40717 · this entry25 Oct 2026, 06:31 UTC1.0013 minutes
@meihaochigua/216607 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC@ay2028/39087 · this entry16 Aug 2026, 06:53 UTC1.009 days
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@chigua66805 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0024 minutes@chigua6680 (5–0)
@meihaochigua5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0012 days@meihaochigua (3–2)
@freechinese5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 days@freechinese (5–0)
@cggxhhh5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0024 minutes@cggxhhh (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 18 of the 18 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 102 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 8 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

65,48389,77177,6277 August 20269 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 94 days, net -24,288. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 61,840–93,414 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 22:1865,483-460
8 Nov 2026, 14:2065,943-554
7 Nov 2026, 09:3866,497-260
6 Nov 2026, 06:1866,757-218
5 Nov 2026, 02:5066,975-216
4 Nov 2026, 02:5967,191-119
3 Nov 2026, 02:5467,310-65
2 Nov 2026, 02:5067,375-317
1 Nov 2026, 04:2667,692-313
31 Oct 2026, 03:2968,005-460
30 Oct 2026, 04:2868,465-391
29 Oct 2026, 01:5968,856-518
27 Oct 2026, 21:4769,374-289
26 Oct 2026, 21:0569,663-622
25 Oct 2026, 20:1970,285-235
24 Oct 2026, 21:4570,520-556
23 Oct 2026, 19:4871,076-361
22 Oct 2026, 21:1671,437-560
21 Oct 2026, 16:0771,997-502
20 Oct 2026, 09:4472,499first reading

Engagement

409 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 194 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.70%
avg views ÷ 65,483 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,120
129 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
129
of 409 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 129 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held409 (7 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total143,943
Reactions total11
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 19:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈6,070
Videos
≈15,100
Links
≈1,120

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5h 02m
Average length
55s

Measured directly from 329 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

67 reactions across 67 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3349.3%
👍1116.4%
⚡57.46%
🤩45.97%
🎉34.48%
👏34.48%
😁22.99%
💩11.49%
💯11.49%
🔥11.49%
😴11.49%
🤔11.49%
🥴11.49%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 78 of the 409 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 409 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 129 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 06:28 UTC≈1,560 viewsread 10 November 2026

资源群👉 @TGDH5 想看更多,搜索关键词即可。比如想要中文包,群里搜索中文包即可。 飞鸟VPN https://join.xlcc.asia?code=888 森林VPN https://178.107.178.20/register?code=888

8 Nov 2026, 06:22 UTC≈1,570 views1 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

#城管 一个月几千块钱这么拼命!

❤1

8 Nov 2026, 06:20 UTC≈1,510 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

延安大学副教授白保国留下绝笔信投湖自尽

8 Nov 2026, 06:20 UTC≈1,460 views1 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

不说了,我要去帮我好兄弟抓奸了🌚🌚

❤1

8 Nov 2026, 06:20 UTC≈1,440 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

商南命案嫌犯孙某自杀身亡 警方通报商南致3死2伤命案...

8 Nov 2026, 06:20 UTC≈1,440 viewsread 10 November 2026
Video

我去好朋友宿舍楼底下的 听说是女的出轨了 第一个视频才是重头戏 广东某师范

8 Nov 2026, 06:18 UTC≈1,420 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

刚刚! 墨尔本CBD持刀伤人事件一死一伤

5 Nov 2026, 13:25 UTC≈1,910 viewsread 7 November 2026

资源群👉 @TGDH5 想看更多,搜索关键词即可。比如想要中文包,群里搜索中文包即可。 飞鸟VPN https://join.xlcc.asia?code=888 森林VPN https://178.107.178.20/register?code=888

5 Nov 2026, 13:20 UTC259 viewsread 7 November 2026
Video

华美创意园这条街几个醉酒精神小伙喝多跟保安打架

Showing the 12 most recent of 409 posts we hold for @ay2028. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@ay2028 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

东南亚狗推(吃瓜)
@MB_149 · 129,984
#1
吃瓜🍉|搞笑🥸|软色情🥵|树洞投稿📮
@onlychigua · 205,268
#2
内涵搞笑🫥
@chiguahs · 107,687
#3
吃瓜群众【 猎奇】
@chiguadog · 155,802
#4
中文吃瓜中心沙雕日常 🍉
@chigua_a · 221,249
#5
吃瓜群众🍉
@chigua_e · 221,288
#6
搞笑视频 吃瓜群众 内涵段子 沙雕日常
@lsd62 · 28,663
#7
内涵段子 🔥搞笑视频 天🌐下
@neihanduanzi1 · 190,731
#8
东南亚挨打日记
@pyzcn · 217,725
#9
缅北悬赏通缉令(吃瓜)❖盈丰娱乐冠名🅥
@DNYTJL3 · 84,214
#10
东南亚悬赏通缉令(曝光)
@QSVQSvrokOKOkok · 2,937
#11
迪拜大事件|迪拜新闻|Dubai生活资讯攻略
@dubai0 · 88,235
#12
西港日记|柬埔寨大事件
@jianpuzhaidashijian · 43,983
#13
搞笑视频/吃瓜群众/吃瓜中心
@gaoxiao88 · 21,399
#14
【吃瓜🍉&搞笑】
@GQSP9 · 57,264
#15
中国悲剧档案官方频道
@newszg_official · 156,515
#16
菲律宾华人事件
@svip40 · 129,751
#17
内涵段子🔥搞笑视频
@nh888 · 160,341
#18
抖音吃瓜
@douyinchigua1 · 22,208
#19
搞笑吃瓜🐶内涵段子/奇趣百科
@chigua_07 · 4,290
#20
快来吃瓜
@renrenchigua · 68,414
#21
柬埔寨華人信息
@jpz_888 · 12,142
#22
搞笑段子《问题不大》😹
@GXduanzi1 · 53,634
#23
吃瓜丨素材丨内涵段子丨搞笑视频
@chiguasucai · 12,058
#24
曝光/吃瓜/搞笑/大事件【南派】🔴
@chigua_08 · 81,511
#25
🍉吃瓜搞笑俱乐部🌚
@cggxhhh · 260,515
#26
东南亚头条大事件
@tp111 · 45,741
#27
吃瓜中心
@guawa9 · 84,737
#28
海外大事件-USD1
@usd1 · 253,398 (as read 18 August 2026)
#29
吃瓜🍉群众
@achiguao · 81,169
#30
车速过快🚦开车娱乐搞笑沙雕
@chesgk · 5,058
#31
皮皮虾🦐搞笑吃瓜
@pipixia · 12,143
#32
海外大事件(猎奇-吃瓜)
@aa144 · 34,618
#33
内涵段子
@neihanduanzi · 902
#34
吃瓜视频战争头条新闻
@xy91d · 13,160
#35
孟玺-东南亚悬赏通缉令
@mianbeitongjiling · 28,456
#36
柬埔寨新闻|华人资讯曝光|cambodia news
@jianpuzhaihuarenzixun · 72,375
#37
电影频道【SOTV】
@cctv1 · 307,314
#38
素材(全通用)🪸
@Sucaiyo · 121,207
#39
吃瓜段子 @FLLCG
@FLLCG · 41,066
#40
东南亚悬赏-吃瓜中心
@dnyggg · 40,810
#41
吃瓜老祖
@chigualaozu · 19,777
#42
搞笑视频/吃瓜群众/吃瓜中心
@chigua_shipin_duanzi · 3,924
#43
吃瓜东南亚头条㊖
@CG887 · 95,467
#44
『皮了个皮』吃瓜
@pilegepi · 14,477
#45
东南亚大事件
@kanxia · 437,687
#46
奇趣百科
@YSTY1 · 4,393
#47
素材人设中心
@sucai6655 · 56,261
#48
💯【佳佳】美食素材圈💯
@sucai177 · 97,443
#49
soso东南亚-百科🌍
@ab100 · 126,776
#50
文案馆向西走/头像/素材
@YTT786 · 101,102
#51
头条新闻💥搞笑视频
@z055q · 25,331
#52
🍉吃瓜-内涵段子-搞笑视频
@chigua88666 · 12,198
#53
吃瓜热门视频
@chigua278 · 38,721
#54
东南亚大事件 @svip
@bx666 · 462,405
#55
海外素材库
@sucai1 · 58,856
#56
搞笑视频
@MoiFunVideo · 6,200
#57

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

吃瓜🍉|搞笑🥸|软色情🥵|树洞投稿📮
@onlychigua · 205,268
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 14 August 2026
吃瓜群众【 猎奇】
@chiguadog · 155,802
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 12 August 2026
全网吃瓜🍉
@aichiguaba · 246,296
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 14 August 2026
内涵段子 🔥搞笑视频 天🌐下
@neihanduanzi1 · 190,731
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 11 August 2026
🍉吃瓜搞笑俱乐部🌚
@cggxhhh · 260,515
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 10 August 2026
(吃瓜)搞笑😐视频
@cgbg8 · 106,850
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 15 August 2026
吃瓜群众🍉
@chigua_e · 221,288
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 11 August 2026
【吃瓜🍉&搞笑】
@GQSP9 · 57,264
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 14 August 2026
内涵段子🔥搞笑视频
@nh888 · 160,341
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 12 August 2026
西港大事件(曝光)
@xigang9918 · 75,669
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 24 August 2026
吃瓜驿站😋🍉
@DNYQWCG · 73,512
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 19 August 2026
吃瓜中心
@guawa9 · 84,737
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 17 August 2026
中文吃瓜中心沙雕日常 🍉
@chigua_a · 221,249
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 12 August 2026
搞笑段子《问题不大》😹
@GXduanzi1 · 53,634
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 13 August 2026
吃瓜群众🍉
@chigua2022 · 190,073
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 11 August 2026
吃瓜🍉群众
@achiguao · 81,169
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 18 August 2026
🍉吃瓜头条《新闻|搞笑|爆料》
@tuigsc · 58,447
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 21 August 2026
头条新闻💥搞笑视频
@z055q · 25,331
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 19 August 2026
中国悲剧档案官方频道
@newszg_official · 156,515
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 12 August 2026
影音中国(中国被禁的视频)
@TwtVideoOfChina · 78,369
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 20 August 2026
内涵搞笑🫥
@chiguahs · 107,687
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 14 August 2026
东南亚头条大事件
@tp111 · 45,741
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“吃瓜猎奇 幽默视频 搞笑段子” (@ay2028), 65,483 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ay2028.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.