为了拿个绿卡,也挺不容易的

Channel
(吃瓜)搞笑😐视频
@cgbg8
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
103,458subscribers
-2,330 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001538812715 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cgbg8 |
| Description | 吃瓜 搞笑 视频 投稿广告联系机器人 👉 @DiDiwbot 飞机切换为中文点击安装中文👇👇👇👇 👉 tg://setlanguage?lang=zhcncc 👈 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cgbg8 |
Topic
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 103,458 | -3,569 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 12:58 | 107,027 | -527 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 09:15 | 107,554 | -138 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:01 | 107,692 | -207 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 107,899 | -219 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:41 | 108,118 | -255 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 20:36 | 108,373 | -127 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:20 | 108,500 | -75 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:34 | 108,575 | -82 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:47 | 108,657 | -106 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 108,763 | -81 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 108,844 | -82 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:14 | 108,926 | -98 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 109,024 | -35 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:39 | 109,059 | +27 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 109,032 | +38 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 108,994 | -38 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 109,032 | -48 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:09 | 109,080 | -260 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 109,340 | first reading |
Engagement
1,230 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.298%
- avg views ÷ 103,458 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 308
- 656 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.523%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 656
- of 1,230 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 306 of 656 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,230 (7 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 201,958 |
| Reactions total | 486 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 22:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈59,600
- Videos
- ≈85,000
- Links
- ≈18,700
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 8h 52m
- Average length
- 43s
Measured directly from 743 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
530 reactions across 315 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 219 | 41.3% | |
| ❤ | 111 | 20.9% | |
| 🥰 | 38 | 7.17% | |
| ⚡ | 30 | 5.66% | |
| 🤩 | 28 | 5.28% | |
| 👏 | 27 | 5.09% | |
| 🎉 | 26 | 4.91% | |
| 😁 | 26 | 4.91% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 3.40% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 0.755% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.189% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.189% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 0.189% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 341 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 530 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 14 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
怎么摔倒的?
精神小妹失恋了
兄弟们,遇到这种不文明现象我们应该怎么办啊
远离大车
女朋友坐火车的时候饿了
她在干嘛
上勾拳
开屏广告导致错过最佳抢救时间 一名山东网友发帖称,母亲凌晨突发心梗,因荣耀手机内置的“魔法画报”全屏广告挡住了拨号界面,父亲无法呼出120,最终错过黄金抢救时间导致母亲离世。 8月30日凌晨4点,19岁博主的母亲突发心梗倒在厕所。父亲拿起手机拨打急救电话时,屏幕被荣耀手机内置的“魔法画报”全屏广告占据。退出按钮极其隐蔽,连年轻人也要花很久才能找到。 父亲无法拨通电话,只能拖着病体挨家敲门求助。心梗急救有“黄金4分钟”窗口期,心脏骤停每延迟1分钟存活率下降7%至10%,母亲最终抢救无效。 家属向荣耀客服提出道歉、下架该功能、赔偿三项诉求,均被以“仅能催促备注”回应,三项诉求无一满足。
毫无安全意识
这两位同学也不是一般人,公共场所把所有人当成他们play的一环
昨晚你杀了几个暴徒,我杀了105个😁 小编:致敬镇暴英雄😁
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,230 posts we hold for @cgbg8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@xuanshangz · 44,60510 posts东南亚大事件
@yuenanU · 219,85210 posts东南亚素材库
@zhaopian · 25,23310 posts奇趣百科 导航
@QQmua · 39,4589 posts内涵搞笑🫥
@chiguahs · 110,0225 posts东南亚大事件 东南亚新闻 柬埔寨新闻
@kk777 · 159,9105 posts🔥开元棋牌-33.vip-🔥官方招商
@kyqp33vip · 1,5724 postsbolai.com铂莱世界杯冠名
@blzhaoshang · 5,0492 postsTG娱乐城-官方招商
@TGYLCzhaoshang · 1,4852 posts6G全球丨官方爆奖俱乐部
@WWW6G007COM · 1,9792 posts猎奇小屋 🔻 奇趣百科 导航
@btlot · 100,5061 post吃瓜大佬@Gdan21
@chiguadalao · 125,1461 post🔥金贝娱乐场-jinbei.com-【官方招商】🔥
@jbzhaoshang · 4,9831 post凯旋娱乐 官方频道
@kxggg · 6,3921 postМария Захарова
@mariavladimirovnazakharova · 462,0301 postQQ空间🍳
@qqxiha · 8,8011 post🔥西港娱乐城-xigang.com-🔥官方招商
@XGzhaoshang · 2,2411 post🔥西湖娱乐城-xihu.cc-【实力招商】🔥
@xihuzs · 4,9621 post新全迅网
@xinquanxunwang · 4,3041 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@bx666 · 467,845#1
@MB_149 · 121,941#2
@chigua_e · 227,506#3
@DNYTJL3 · 93,598#4
@chiguahs · 110,022#5
@lsd62 · 25,101#6
@GQSP9 · 80,847#7
@onlychigua · 200,669#8
@chigua_a · 208,460#9
@gaoxiao88 · 22,328#10
@ay2028 · 77,862#11
@chiguasucai · 12,189#12
@newszg_official · 162,958#13
@pyzcn · 220,166#14
@usd1 · 252,985 (as read 15 August 2026)#15
@chiguadog · 153,856#16
@jianpuzhaidashijian · 44,715#17
@jpz_888 · 12,661#18
@guawa9 · 88,468#19
@ygxw3 · 143,918#20
@GXduanzi1 · 77,288#21
@dubai0 · 77,364#22
@guagua · 73,823#23
@hhdwag · 19,105#24
@toutiaoshijian · 74,884#25
@sucai177 · 107,747#26
@sucai277 · 108,385#27
@svip40 · 110,383#28
@neihanduanzi1 · 226,296#29
@qiqubk · 59,837#30
@chesgk · 5,123#31
@wenanhs1 · 30,878#32
@chigua278 · 40,466#33
@achiguao · 81,872#34
@cctv1 · 308,989#35
@aa144 · 35,291#36
@taiwansucai223 · 11,601#37
@tp111 · 49,218#38
@dj17 · 113,188#39
@wangyiy1 · 4,415#40
@dnyggg · 43,934#41
@MeiPinTu · 16,803#42
@chigua_08 · 21,560#43
@chigualaozu · 19,877#44
@pp854 · 65,126#45
@cggxhhh · 267,452#46
@nh888 · 178,982#47
@pipixia · 12,326#48
@woshadiao · 115,194#49
@wenanle · 5,047#50
@daxxx · 63,314#51
@bx777 · 43,100#52
@sucai1 · 104,012#53
@MoiFunVideo · 6,265#54
@wgsb · 211,133 (as read 15 August 2026)#55
@mianbeitongjiling · 30,330#56
@telonews_cn · 83,174#57
@meitian · 28,648#58
@meishisc · 30,528#59
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@chigua_007 · 56,668
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 15 here — alongside 14 others — read 25 August 2026
@lightrekt · 49,340
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 25 August 2026
@chiguadog · 153,856
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 12 August 2026
@xigang9918 · 67,385
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 24 August 2026
@newszg_official · 162,958
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 12 August 2026
@pdsss · 54,442
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 23 August 2026
@GXduanzi1 · 77,288
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 13 August 2026
@chigua_a · 208,460
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 12 August 2026
@tuigsc · 69,020
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 21 August 2026
@chiguahs · 110,022
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 14 August 2026
@feixingzhe_cgzx · 164,713
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 12 August 2026
@nh888 · 178,982
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 12 August 2026
@tp111 · 49,218
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 23 August 2026
@CG887 · 108,701
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 August 2026
@DNY181 · 50,098
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 22 August 2026
@TwtVideoOfChina · 74,789
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 20 August 2026
@AQzx_7 · 36,713
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 23 August 2026
@wenan888 · 62,718
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 20 August 2026
@chiguak · 39,899
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 23 August 2026
@TRJ668899 · 44,812
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 27 August 2026
@sucai277 · 108,385
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 15 August 2026
@miandianDS · 45,525
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 27 August 2026
@tx100 · 158,539
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 12 August 2026
@TGBG01 · 54,868
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“(吃瓜)搞笑😐视频” (@cgbg8), 103,458 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cgbg8.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.