Channel
@cctv5
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
180,914subscribers
+891 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001434006593 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cctv5 |
| Description | 🤝广告投放 @LaXin 👮♀️投稿联系 @cctv9 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cctv5 |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @cctv5/38349 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 02:56 UTC | @cctv3/442567 Aug 2026, 02:58 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @cctv3/442587 Aug 2026, 03:12 UTC | @cctv5/38351 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 03:42 UTC | 1.00 | 29 minutes |
| @cctv3/442647 Aug 2026, 05:25 UTC | @cctv5/38357 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 05:25 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @cctv5/38359 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 05:54 UTC | @cctv3/442667 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC | 1.00 | 21 minutes |
| @cctv3/442687 Aug 2026, 06:23 UTC | @cctv5/38361 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 06:24 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @cctv3/442847 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC | @cctv5/38377 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @cctv3 | 15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (8–7) |
| @cctv1 | 9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 24 hours | @cctv1 (7–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 14 of the 14 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 31 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @cctv1. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:06 | 180,914 | -458 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 181,372 | -631 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:41 | 182,003 | -495 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 182,498 | -428 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:08 | 182,926 | +2,903 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 180,023 | first reading |
186 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 186 (7 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 775,673 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 82 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
【2028体育】TG全网最大信誉平台 玩家首选 🇺🇸🇻🇳🇷🇪🇻🇪🇺🇸🇻🇳⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡ 全网每月投流费用高达千万😃 #2028体育 无处不在 ⚡⚡免实名 专属网址: 2028405.com #大户首选 支持任意平台vip等级平移，平台支持USDT 👌微信👌支付宝 K豆等100多种钱包！ 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈 首存送 复存送 投注送 豪车嫩模！ 电子黄金周 周一至周日福利拿不停！ 单笔出款奖励最高⚡😍😍😍😍😍 以小博大PP电子 极速糖果1000 爆出12103倍💥 百家乐战神真人收割机 大佬一天收割2000万💥 气运之子PP电子 麻将大胜 100元爆25000倍250万💥 PG战神 独创奇迹大佬麻将胡了1 两万一拉爆了3400万💥 ⚡️2028体育欢迎各大老板盘总娱乐 #东南亚超高爆率电子人民币台 PG电子单注可拉2万一转 百家乐单注限红可打20万一口 （大额提款无忧） ➡️ 福…
😂😂😂😂 182体育 2026世界杯官方指定投注平台 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 永久网址😳😁😉😚： 182774.com 😅😚😏😝😍😀😃😃😅😏😱😀🙃😢 #182体育 大客户最佳选择： #免实名 （安全保障客户信息安全）无需绑银行卡 无需绑手机号 😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀 2月21日 爆奖多多【h* h】在 PP电子《极速糖果1000》爆出 440万 3月12日 超级大水【y*0】在 PG电子《麻将胡了》一周豪夺奖金 887万 4月25日 激情来袭【h*5】在PA真人《百家乐》豪赢555万 4月28日 体面上岸 【b*0】在PG电子《赏金女王》一周时间狂揽盈利2533万 更多爆奖高光时刻敬请关注查看👉 官方频道 😍😁😁😁😁☺️🔥❤️😁😁🔥😁🔥☺️🔥加入即可有机会领取 大额出款额外奖励8888-128888，双重日存彩金128888+4688每日送，周流水彩金68888每周送，双重签到彩金168…
Y3国际 🤩🤩🤩🤩 品牌铸就非凡 · 实力绝非偶然 👌超级玩家赌神附体，狂揽1.6亿，可自行验证真伪 ⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡ y30384.com #Y3国际 ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 全网最权威综合U台 全网广告费每月投入高达1000万U+，Y3 无处不在 #大户首选 免实名 免手机号 电子可3000U一拉 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 1、 用300U爆奖140万U，成功提款 145万U 2、 反水1700u仅用80u爆奖54万u 成功提款60万U 3、 仅用4U玩极速糖果1000 爆奖12500倍赢4.9万U 4、 真人百家乐大放水，20万赢走600万U 5、大哥 状态拉满！一周内拉 麻将胡了 赢走1340万U 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 #全网福利天花板 1、单笔提款50万U+ ，赠送5888U-88888U额外奖励 2、支持任意平台vip等级平移 3、…
宝马运166公斤冰毒闯关被捕 马男称“不知袋子谁的” 马来西亚籍男子驾宝马逃避华欣检查站 警方拦截搜出166公斤冰毒 嫌疑人称行李箱非己所有 副警总长下令追查贩毒网络 华欣警方8月10日在当地检查站拦截一辆白色宝马车，20岁马来西亚籍男司机试图逃逸，被捕后车内搜出约166公斤冰毒。嫌疑人声称行李箱非其所有、不知密码。 泰国皇家警察副总监萨姆兰·努安玛表示，该案由小毒贩线索深挖而来，毒品疑自素万那普机场走私入境。警方已下令加快调查，追捕相关贩毒网络成员。 ========================= ✔️曝光频道： @cctv3 ✔️新闻频道： @cctv5
在 Khlong 7 十字路口，一辆公交车追尾一辆摩托车，导致一名警官被碾压致死。 巴吞他尼府塔尼武里县兰实街道7号巷旧红绿灯路口发生一起致命车祸。一辆隶属于当地公司的白色巴士追尾一辆红色摩托车，导致摩托车驾驶人——警方中士布恩帕·布恩梅塔当场被碾压身亡。 现场可见巴士左前侧严重撞击变形，摩托车尾部凹陷、侧翻路旁。塔尼武里警局调查官阿迪特普中校接报后携鲁安卡塔纽基金会救援队迅速赶赴处置，移出遗体并勘察取证。目前警方正详细调查事故原因，后续将依法追究责任。 ========================= ✔️曝光频道： @cctv3 ✔️新闻频道： @cctv5
😂😂😂😂 球速体育 相信品牌的力量，老品牌，值得信赖 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 球速 永久网址 😳😁😉😚 83qs.cc 😄😄😚😚🥲😌😌😆😋U存U提随便提 🧐😏😋☺️😄😁😄🥲🧐保障客户信息安全 真假可鉴 相信品牌的力量 世间奇迹 1000赢300万， 财务秒出款 3天打了7亿流水 单笔提款512万 电子大水，大哥玩电子单笔提款530万，一周提款1460多万 PP电子 《极速糖果1000》20次免费旋转直接爆出 500万 体面上岸 👉 PG电子《麻将糊了》 连续5天疯狂盈利 4452万 更多战绩查看👉 官方频道 😍😁😁😁😁☺️🔥❤️😁😁🔥😁🔥☺️🔥 加入 #球速体育 即可有机会领取 大额出款额外奖励8888-128888，日存彩金4688每日送，周流水彩金68888每周送，签到彩金3888送不停 每笔存款加赠1% 官方频道：@QSTY518 专属客服: @QSTY9 双向用户可联系: …
20岁中国青年公寓遇刺案案发细节：职业学校学生因嫉妒在女友房间过夜而被当场抓获，残忍地刺死了富商之子。 泰国芭堤雅近日发生一起情杀命案。一名职业学校学生因怀疑女友移情别恋，深夜返回女友住处时发现房门被反锁，女友谎称“正在换衣”拖延时间。 他强行闯入后，在浴室内发现一名中国男子躲藏——该男子为当地游艇船主之子。妒火中烧的学生随即取刀与女友对峙，中国男子试图夺刀反击，双方扭打中他遭对方刺伤。 最终，学生夺回利刃，疯狂捅刺致对方死亡，随后驾车逃离现场。事后，其监护人带他赴医院治伤，并陪同向警方投案自首。案件正在进一步侦办中。 ========================= ✔️曝光频道： @cctv3 ✔️新闻频道： @cctv5
泰国北碧府幼儿发展中心撞车事故调查出现新进展 警方公布检测结果显示，肇事黑色轿车司机及车上一名乘客体内均检出毒品成分。其中，54岁司机被发现含有甲基苯丙胺（冰毒）、海洛因及大麻成分，警方已对其提出5项指控。 这起事故发生于8月7日，一辆黑色本田思域轿车撞入北碧府直辖县康谢县农宋通幼儿发展中心。当时中心内共有34名幼儿正在休息，事故造成20名儿童受伤，其中19人经医生评估后确认情况安全，另有1名儿童仍在医院接受治疗。 警方调查指出，54岁的肇事司机目前被控包括驾驶疏忽导致财产损失及人员受伤、非法持有无登记枪支、未经许可在公共场所携带枪支、吸食毒品，以及吸毒后驾驶含甲基苯丙胺成分车辆等5项罪名。 警方表示，司机毒品检测结果呈阳性，检出甲基苯丙胺、海洛因及大麻。与此同时，车上一名20岁的乘客也因体内检测出海洛因成分，被警方以吸食毒品罪处理。 警方目前已查扣涉案物品，包括1把.32口径短枪、4发子弹、1个弹匣、1个枪套，以及涉…
【N1国际】U投首选平台|实力认证 |值得信赖！ 😀😀😀😀😀😀⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡ 😀注册网址： N1023.com 全网广告频道上押1️⃣0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣万😘 TG最大信誉平台 玩家首选综合🔤台 😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘😘 😀每日返水😀😀😀返水无上限 大额无忧！ 气运之子：PP极速糖果 30U爆25000倍大奖75万U 😀 糖果大水：PP极速糖果 单注500爆得500万U巨奖😀 PG大水：玩家在麻将胡了2 拉出满屏八万 爆230万U 😀 麻将大水：PG电子麻将胡了2 玩家进关爆510万U 😀 #大户首选 支持任意平台vip等级平移 首复存均送每日存每日送 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 USDT存出款 电子超高爆率！#电子真人0审核包出款 😳😁😉😚 无风控 免实名 无需手机号 ⚡⚡⚡👍👍👍👍👍 😀Solaire千亿实体资本，菲律宾索莱尔 · 官方直营😘#真人视讯单注限红20万u一口 欢迎各位大佬来爆庄 😀 申请客服：@N1V…
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀【贵宾会】 强势启航，集团背书，信誉担保，全网首发，引爆彩票娱乐新纪元！六合彩49倍 挑战全网心水 全民代理全民收单 助您白手起家 加拿大28全网最高赔率 挑战全网公式 官网 750.cc 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀【辉煌】业界最高返水 1.6%无上限 😀【辉煌】免实名不限地区 日提千万U 😀【辉煌】网投第一品牌 公正公平无私彩 😀【辉煌】10亿😂奖池 大奖根本爆不停 😀【辉煌】福利天花板 入款笔笔赠送3% 😀【辉煌】盘总首选娱乐城 创造新辉煌 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😕助您辉煌人生，雪中送炭不如锦上添花： 😀单笔出款😀😀😀万 额外奖励18888 😀单笔出款😀😀😀万 额外奖励58888 😘狗庄落泪：昨日幸运玩家仅用800u返水爆庄193万u，0审核0卡款 财务秒出 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😘官方招商: @HHDL8888 😘官方飞投: @HH0933bot
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🤑 铂莱娱乐 8年老品牌 广告费每月投入高达500万U，全网担保上押1300万U，送“野鸡黑台”一句话，勿伤玩家利益，勿毁博彩信誉。 🫢 【贵宾会 750.cc 】 强势启航，集团背书，信誉担保，全网首发，引爆彩票娱乐新纪元！六合彩49倍 挑战全网心水 全民代理全民收单 助您白手起家 加拿大28全网最高赔率 挑战全网公式 🏃♀️ 很多平台热衷于宣传玩家中奖，却对中奖后的“漫长审核”“异常冻结”闭口不谈。 😀 就在本月，PG电子爆出200万u巨奖。本金仅为5000u…… 😎 截至目前：200万U 已极速下发，单笔提款百万u秒出，亿级储备金硬核坐镇，不要去考验小盘的良心，要选就选大盘的实力。 🌟 当无数野鸡网在生灭中挣扎时，铂莱始终屹立不倒。这就是我们送给全行业最响亮的耳光！ 😀😀😀😀: @BLKF0 😀😀😀😀: @bolaidaili 🟢🟢😀😄: @bolaiylc_bot …
泰国女摊贩摸黑驾车撞野象 车头损毁受伤 10日凌晨3时15分，泰国罗勇府344号公路发生车祸，一名卖盒饭的女摊贩驾驶货车撞上一头正在过马路的野象，车头严重凹陷变形，女司机头部和面部受伤送医。 其儿子称，因深夜道路昏暗，起初误将野象看成树影，发现时已刹车不及。被撞野象受伤后逃入附近林中，相关部门正搜寻评估其伤势。 ========================= ✔️曝光频道： @cctv3 ✔️新闻频道： @cctv5
Showing the 12 most recent of 186 posts we hold for @cctv5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,053,757 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“新闻频道 @cctv5” (@cctv5), 180,914 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cctv5.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.