Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Trader Club

Channel

Trader Club

@cakeshare

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,164subscribers

-21 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001511335134
TypeChannel
Username@cakeshare
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cakeshare

Growth

3,1643,1853,174.57 August 2026 — 3,185 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,185 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,182 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,175 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,174 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,177 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,169 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,164 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 20 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,161–3,188 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 13:473,164-5
24 Aug 2026, 05:253,169-8
20 Aug 2026, 15:223,177+3
17 Aug 2026, 13:073,174-1
14 Aug 2026, 13:263,175-7
10 Aug 2026, 21:533,182-3
7 Aug 2026, 06:303,185no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:233,185first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.42%
avg views ÷ 3,164 subscribers
Avg views / post
203
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held21 (2 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total4,269
Reactions total273
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

273 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7728.2%
👍7226.4%
🎉6222.7%
🔥5720.9%
🤔20.733%
🤯20.733%
😁10.366%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 273reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:57 UTC119 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://youtube.com/live/uW3JfIJ4OT8?feature=share 准备直播啦

7 Aug 2026, 05:18 UTC143 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

@everyone ☀️日报 :晚八点半有非农数据!!!📌 1. 特朗普刚刚重量级表态:与伊朗的战争将“很快”结束! 美国总统特朗普对记者表示,他认为与伊朗的战争将很快结束,并称美国武装部队在部分武器供应方面正面临问题 2. 日本重磅数据披露!史无前例的日元保卫战:日本4月单日买入日元创历史新高 面对日元持续贬值压力,日本当局于4月在外汇市场进行了创纪录的单日买入日元干预行动,抛售了价值400亿美元的美元资产,以此重启大规模买入日元的行动,旨在遏制日元汇率的跌 3. 美元指数在100关口徘徊 周五亚洲时段,美元指数窄幅波动,交投于100.00心理关口附近。地缘政治风险持续升温为美元提供了避险买盘支撑,油价反弹则重新点燃通胀担忧,强化了美联储加息预期

6 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC183 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

消息人士:伊朗和阿曼就霍尔木兹海的重新开放达成初步共识

🤔1

6 Aug 2026, 06:50 UTC193 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/rVBLc69Jm1w

🎉1👍1

6 Aug 2026, 06:31 UTC184 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

@everyone ☀️日报 : 晚八点半有失业金数据 1. 美银:联合干预后日元年内有望反弹约6% 美银周三发布最新汇率预测,大幅上调日元兑美元年末目标价,预计在美日政府协调干预及日本央行未来数月加息的共同作用下,日元将从当前约158的水平升值约6%,年底达到149兑1美元。 此前的预测为152 2. 金价技术面重大破位 周四(8月6日)亚市早盘,现货黄金在上一交易日暴涨后延续大涨走势,目前金价位于4283美元/盎司附近

👍2🎉1🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC221 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=El4K4hf4WMk

5👍3🎉1🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 06:58 UTC205 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

美股热点狙击|8/05 主线:AI 产业链全面回暖|软件、芯片、数据中心同步走强 1|Palantir 财报超预期,AI 软件需求继续升温 PLTR Q2 业绩强劲,商业业务高速增长,公司上调全年指引。 🎯关注:PLTR、MSFT 2|AI 基建逻辑扩散,设备与电力链受益 Caterpillar 订单创新高,数据中心建设推动工程设备、电力需求增长。 🎯关注:CAT、VRT 3|AMD 财报后震荡,AI 芯片竞争继续 AMD 数据中心业务高速增长,但市场关注高估值与未来指引。 🎯关注:AMD、NVDA 4|半导体板块强势反弹 费城半导体指数大涨,芯片股全面回暖,资金重新流入科技板块。 🎯关注:NVDA、AMD、MU、SOXX 📌 今日关注 AI 资金回流,产业链形成共振: 软件 → 芯片 → 数据中心 → 电力设备 重点观察

👍42🎉1🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 06:22 UTC173 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

@everyone ☀️日报 1. 油价大跌推动加息预期降温,金价创两周新高 周三(8月5日)亚洲时段,现货黄金震荡走高。美伊谈判削弱了地缘避险买盘,油价暴跌引发的通胀降温预期,正在推动市场下调美联储加息押注 2. 美日联合干预难改颓势,日元短暂反弹背后中长期贬值压力依旧挥之不去 美日两国完成数十年来首次协同外汇干预,推动日元出现阶段性反弹,美元兑日元自数十年高位快速回落。从宏观基本面来看,造成日元持续走弱的核心驱动因素并未得到实质性修复 3. 美伊释放重大缓和信号,现货黄金高位持稳,美油重挫超6% 亚市早盘,现货黄金交投于4083美元/盎司附近,油价周二重挫超6%,美原油现交投于75.34美元/桶附近

🎉6🔥4👍31

5 Aug 2026, 02:44 UTC182 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

媒体:美方计划周三宣布就霍尔木兹海峡达成协议

10👍4🎉3🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC215 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

卡塔尔方面表示,“已就可能的”美伊协议“起草了文本”

👍6🔥54🎉3

4 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC221 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/-6DzrNGJeXw

6👍6🎉3🔥3

4 Aug 2026, 06:22 UTC214 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

@everyone ☀️日报 1. 黄金交易提醒:特朗普“假动作”难解中东困局,金价震荡拉锯 现货黄金在周一(8月3日)盘初一度冲高至每盎司4082美元附近,随后震荡回落至4020美元附近,最终报4055.34美元,跌幅0.22% 2. 高市倡议减税补贴双管齐下,日元面临“慢性利空”考验 周二(8月4日)亚洲时段,美元兑日元小幅反弹,当前交投于157.50附近。美元兑日元在经历近两年来最猛烈的下跌后,正试图企稳 3. 美日重磅信号!贝森特罕见公开喊话美联储寻求协助捍卫日元 这“极不寻常” 美国财政部长贝森特呼吁美联储扩大一项可供日本用于支持本国货币的工具,使美国财政部与美联储之间的关系再度成为市场焦点。这两个机构通常会保持一定距离,各自在职责范围内运作

🎉8👍53🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @cakeshare. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Trader Club” (@cakeshare), 3,164 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cakeshare.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.