會員反饋 勝率配合著盈虧比,先學會少虧錢才能學會賺錢,落袋屬於自己的利潤,才是交易的意義 一路跟隨的夥伴皆有所收穫,期盼能與大家繼續同行 所有觀點嚴禁賭博式操作 重倉操作策略請移步至VIP 免費加入可聯繫助理: @kefu_YZ

Channel
King的幣圈合約交易軌跡✍️
@cryptowesear
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,270subscribers
-1,733 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001793147617 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptowesear |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptowesear |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Oct 2026, 15:01 | 6,270 | +284 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 07:01 | 5,986 | +342 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 22:19 | 5,644 | -18 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:19 | 5,662 | -187 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 21:18 | 5,849 | -163 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:55 | 6,012 | -114 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:24 | 6,126 | -202 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:38 | 6,328 | -186 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:32 | 6,514 | -224 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 6,738 | -263 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 22:56 | 7,001 | -169 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:27 | 7,170 | -298 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 7,468 | -247 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 7,715 | -275 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:59 | 7,990 | -13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 8,003 | first reading |
Engagement
84 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 84 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
82 reactions across 32 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 32 | 39.0% | |
| 👌 | 19 | 23.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 13 | 15.9% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 11.0% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 4.88% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 3.66% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 2.44% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 84 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 84 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#UB 市價做一筆多單預期 左側下方給一筆接多預期防守 (也可低倍槓桿做補倉)
#LINK 預期完美止盈了 這單沒設tp2 tp1走完了😂
💯1
今天就祝大家七夕節愉快了🙂
❤🔥4👍2
#ETH 簡單拿下 預期之內,3倍完美止盈
💯3
#ETH 同步獲利 可惜了sol🫠 這單跟上了嗎? 給點反餽👍
👍9
#SOL 走突破預期 更新一筆接多預期 突破77.9撤單
#LINK 跟上了嗎? 來點反饋👍
👍6
#SOL 三次測試支撐實體陽包陰 低點有個看漲ob 這裡反轉概率很大 這筆空單先出局吧 這裡做空沒什麼性價比了 等實體突破77.2考慮做多
#LINK 最近真的有被洗到懷疑人生 高點突破 小級別回調站穩 這裡可以做一筆右側的多單 窄損博弈一下
#ETH 很標準的右側反轉看漲結構 高點不斷突破 低點拿掉了流動性 這裡15分鐘能站上1915就去開筆多單 左側下方1899處掛一筆接多預期
#LINK 這裡可以增加一筆空單
Showing the 12 most recent of 84 posts we hold for @cryptowesear. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
做一筆主流預期(二選一)
- BTC50%
- ETH53%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 84 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 20 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@qqbtceth1688 · 18,876
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 October 2026
@Xboshi1 · 21,025
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 September 2026
@oobbb1 · 21,452
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 September 2026
@bitebishuqin · 46,315
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 30 August 2026
@btcyouliang · 28,483
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 9 September 2026
@btc18688 · 27,080
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 September 2026
@sanmage · 33,592
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“King的幣圈合約交易軌跡✍️” (@cryptowesear), 6,270 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptowesear.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.