Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Біле ⨁ Сонце

Channel

Біле ⨁ Сонце

@ZUNARM

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,820subscribers

+16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001525071604
TypeChannel
Username@ZUNARM
DescriptionВісник Третьої Альтернативи. @zunarm_west - західне відділення руху Третьої Альтернативи. @Siherheitdienst2_bot - зв'язок з адміністрацією. Текстові огляди, думки, платформа для обговорення, гумор - все для вас!
Created31 July 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ZUNARM

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@ZUNARM/24050 · this entry2 Nov 2026, 21:18 UTC@bila_varta/101752 Nov 2026, 21:27 UTC1.008 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@bila_varta8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.004.5 hours@bila_varta (5–3)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 249 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @bila_varta. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

7,8047,9007,8526 August 2026 — 7,804 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,805 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,809 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,851 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,854 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,864 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,880 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,896 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,900 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,892 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,879 subscribers8 September 2026 — 7,869 subscribers16 September 2026 — 7,864 subscribers2 October 2026 — 7,855 subscribers9 October 2026 — 7,846 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,844 subscribers16 October 2026 — 7,851 subscribers19 October 2026 — 7,828 subscribers22 October 2026 — 7,823 subscribers25 October 2026 — 7,820 subscribers31 October 2026 — 7,808 subscribers3 November 2026 — 7,820 subscribers6 November 2026 — 7,833 subscribers9 November 2026 — 7,820 subscribers7,8206 August 20269 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 96 days, net +16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,790–7,914 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 19:287,820-13
6 Nov 2026, 06:277,833+13
3 Nov 2026, 05:207,820+12
31 Oct 2026, 13:087,808-12
25 Oct 2026, 11:067,820-3
22 Oct 2026, 14:587,823-5
19 Oct 2026, 09:567,828-23
16 Oct 2026, 16:277,851+7
14 Oct 2026, 00:367,844-2
9 Oct 2026, 00:157,846-9
2 Oct 2026, 05:407,855-9
16 Sept 2026, 13:417,864-5
8 Sept 2026, 22:147,869-10
3 Sept 2026, 17:017,879-13
31 Aug 2026, 11:447,892-8
28 Aug 2026, 00:547,900+4
25 Aug 2026, 03:447,896+16
22 Aug 2026, 05:347,880+16
19 Aug 2026, 04:477,864+10
16 Aug 2026, 06:377,854first reading

Engagement

295 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.3%
avg views ÷ 7,820 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,590
96 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
96
of 295 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held295 (4 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total152,653
Reactions total7,352
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 01:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈12,900
Videos
≈4,170
Links
≈3,480

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4h 08m
Average length
6m 03s

Measured directly from 41 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

18,741 reactions across 277 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯5,72230.5%
👍2,39512.8%
❤2,12411.3%
⚡1,7499.33%
🤬1,6418.76%
🎃1,1996.40%
🔥7053.76%
🙈5402.88%
👀3581.91%
❤‍🔥3001.60%
🍾1951.04%
😢1951.04%
🤯1730.923%
🫡1660.886%
👏1590.848%
🤔1500.8%
😡1420.758%
🙏1230.656%
👎1070.571%
😈1000.534%
10 further kinds4982.66%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 295 of the 295 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19,906 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 295 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
117
across the posts below
Posts paid on
25
of 295 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
60
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ZUNARM. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 295 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 22 of 96 posts held from the last 30 days (22.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 16:15 UTC≈1,940 views73 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

В України три шляхи : штурм, картелі і жиди, Я не знаю, що робити і куди тепер іти... В України вороги - ухилянти і хохли, ну, а ще антисеміти, най би здохли всі вони! #гумор @zunarm

❤51🎃15⚡7

10 Nov 2026, 15:25 UTC≈1,300 views45 reactionsread 11 November 2026

На переговорах в ОАЕ вдалося домовитися про «масштабний обмін полоненими найближчим часом», — «Радіо Свобода». Добились максимума. @zunarm

🙏30🤬6😭5🙈2🎃1👍1

10 Nov 2026, 14:26 UTC≈1,550 views59 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Потрібно об’єднати області в більші регіони: Волинь, Галичину, Слобожанщину, Запоріжжя, Сіверщину тощо — це спростить управління країною, — ексглава МЗС Дмитро Кулеба. Це підвалини федералізації та створення кількох країн з вищезазначеними назвами. Але рука кремля - це ті, хто виступє за мир. @zunarm

🎃48💯9❤2

10 Nov 2026, 12:01 UTC≈1,890 views71 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Багатодітного ветерана силоміць затримали в Чернівцях, посадовцям ТЦК оголосили підозри, — Лубінець У Чернівцях чоловіка, який має трьох дітей, бойовий досвід та чинну відстрочку від мобілізації, силоміць затягнули до мікроавтобуса. За словами Лубінця, ветерану погрожували пістолетом, а його відстрочку двічі протягом доби скасовували вручну, попри автоматичне підтвердження права на неї. А ну, дивімось як репне нав…

👍44💯25❤1🎃1

10 Nov 2026, 11:45 UTC≈1,330 views67 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Добро пожаловать в ад. Вот только депрессивно созерцать проблему и призывать к ее решению, пусть и ценой гибели государственности - это две большие разницы. Для меня главными ударами по патриотизму стали спланированность Киевом и Банковой, одновременно, окружения Мариуполя для уничтожения старого Азова и последующей публичной казни настоящих правых Украины в Оленовке. Потом демарш в Турции, после которого фактичес…

💯42❤‍🔥21❤2⚡1👍1

10 Nov 2026, 11:21 UTC≈1,180 views41 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Декілька днів думав, чи писати взагалі щось по темі «Карфагену», декілька разів починав та повністю переписував текст через те, що в ньому взагалі не було цензурних слів. Тут будуть суто мої емоції/відчуття, це не аналітика, тож якщо не хочете, то не читайте. Думав, що пройде декілька днів, я заспокоюсь, мене відпустять емоції та я зможу на холодну голову спокійно все проаналізувати, прийти до адекватних висновків т…

❤22💯16🕊2🎃1

10 Nov 2026, 09:51 UTC≈1,470 views68 reactionsread 11 November 2026

На сегодня, наши ожидания от переговоров, в самом лучшем случае - обмены пленными и соглашения об ограничении ударов. Требования РФ слишком амбициозны, а наши надеются на дом Демократов в США. Все ещё нет условий для мира: Россия не истощена до предела и не стала лёгкой добычей для своих же союзников, а Украина - не доведена до отчаяния, наши и их элиты подсели на войну как на героин. Поэтому, снизьте ожидания. П…

❤42💯11😢10👍2🎃1👎1🤬1

10 Nov 2026, 03:12 UTC≈1,400 views90 reactions5 Starsread 11 November 2026

Временами нужно напоминать с чего всё начиналось, чтобы разные пропагандонки не искривляли реальность в пользу загнивающего миндичизма. Наш информационно-просветительский вестник появился еще до начала полномасштабного вторжения, как продолжение интеллектуального крыла осколков социал-национального движения. Начало войны мы застали как уже достаточно известный небольшой канал. Мы освещали события и помогали по мер…

❤‍🔥51💯25❤7👏3👍2🫡1😢1

10 Nov 2026, 02:07 UTC≈1,320 views49 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Тим часом, поки держпропаганда ліпить з сонцистів хіба не особисту армію путіна, якою він планує влаштувати нацистський переворот, з СІЗО вийшов останній фігурант справи Міндіча. Наразі усі відомі фігуранти провадження – на волі, а деякі – за кордоном, в Ізраїлі, зокрема, за ексміністра енергетики Германа Галущенка внесли заставу в розмірі 150 млн грн. Дмитро Басов, Ігор Фурсенко, Леся Устименко та Людмила Зоріна те…

🤬37👏5❤2🎃2💯2👍1

10 Nov 2026, 01:56 UTC≈1,450 views56 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

До речі, пані Гадзинська - досвідчений пропагандист. Від просування пропаганди Сороса, щодо применшення втрат українців під час голодомору та пропаганди ковід-істерії, до замовних статей щодо ринку ліків, жорстокості в армії, якої "нема", та "індусів, яких завозить пропаганда р0сні". Але не р0сня заявила про необхідність завезення мільйонів мігрантів, це зробили бізнесмени, аналітики та публіцисти України. Через г…

👍44❤5⚡3💯3🙏1

10 Nov 2026, 01:43 UTC≈1,480 views87 reactions5 Starsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Мама, я в Тель-а-Візорі. Ми до речі, досі не отримали ані підтверджень, що катівні не було, ані пояснень, нащо на Борщагівку приїхав Буданов, ані пояснень яким чином в підвалі опинилися бусифіковані та зесичі, ані пояснення, чому фігуранти справи Хімпрома вийшли під заставу в той же день, а "псевдомедикиня" - одразу без права застави сіла... Але вже готове пояснення, що всі ми - рука кремля. Що ж, пані Гадзинська,…

🫡61💯13👍12🕊1

9 Nov 2026, 18:55 UTC≈1,520 views80 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Старший брат радника ОП Михайла Подоляка – Володимир загинув, воюючи на боці росіян. Згідно з витоком даних Росстату, 59-річний Подоляк загинув 19 травня 2024 року в Запорізькій області. Про його смерть повідомлялося раніше, але витік розкрив нові обставини, вірогідно він служив в підрозділах ГРУ. @zunarm

🍾65🎃11🫡4

Showing the 12 most recent of 295 posts we hold for @ZUNARM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@ZUNARM edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 August 2026

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Билини IV Імперії ✙
@sanatoriy_satany · 17,909
11 posts
Біла Варта
@bila_varta · 6,331
10 posts
СНІДАНОК ХИМЕРИ
@khymera_snidanok · 21,246
10 posts
ukrain1an ꑭ news
@ukrain1an_news · 37,949
8 posts
ꑭ ᴠᴀʟʜöʟʟ ✙
@vallholl · 16,553
7 posts
Аналітика Куща
@Analityka_Kush · 48,402
2 posts
Филфот
@NTSP2 · 3,223
2 posts
Бахмутський Демон 👹
@bahshiddemon · 169,863
2 posts
Белтейн
@bealltainnn · 836
2 posts
𝐹⊙尺ㄒΣㄒ☡△ 𝓛▽ᓰ▽
@fortetzalviv · 4,714
2 posts
Ювента
@project_juventa · 2,741
2 posts
Потужний Інформатор
@ukr_informant · 7,603
2 posts
Nachtigall ✙
@Kleines_reich · 3,375
1 post
ME NE FREGO ✙ 🇺🇦
@MeNeFreg8 · 11,907
1 post
✙Медвежатко✙|🍉
@Medvezhatko1488 · 11,614
1 post
The Occupied Times
@OccupiedTimes · 4,699
1 post
Ostap Drozdov
@OstapDrozdovOfficial · 15,376
1 post
PMC «valhöll»
@PMCvalholl · 462
1 post
Shaposhnikov News
@RostyslavS · 19,502
1 post
Стратегікон
@STRATINT_Prometheus · 149
1 post
Андрій Останд
@andriiostand_blog · 38,296
1 post
Біла Варта. Львів
@bila_varta_lviv · 59
1 post
ghost in the army
@callsign_plasma · 4,314
1 post
Фурманюк до талого 2.0 (из пепла) 🔥👣
@do_talogo_iz_pepla · 1,051
1 post
Даніель Шеліговський
@dszeligowski · 718
1 post
Ельфійська правда
@elventruth · 2,144
1 post
ГНАП
@gnapinfo · 20,569
1 post
Vladyslav Woitsekhovskyi
@h37siwwh · 136
1 post
Євген Карась ✙
@karas_evgen · 161,864
1 post
Nacjonalista.pl - portal NR
@nacjonalistapl · 1,506
1 post
Narodowe Odrodzenie Polski (NOP) - Nacjonalistyczna Opozycja
@nacjonalizmNOP · 1,988
1 post
На повестке Днепр
@napovestkeDn · 61,457
1 post
На повестке Харьков
@napovestkeKh · 66,482
1 post
✙ НТП ✙
@nt_orthodox · 4,369
1 post
Офіцер
@officer_33 · 179,647
1 post
Скринька Пандори
@pandoras_box_ua · 157,920
1 post
🕸Panopticon XXI: Post-democracy⛓‍💥⏳
@panopticon21 · 2,448
1 post
Sample Channel Name #32
@sampleName32 · 13,436
1 post
Алексей Скрипченко
@skripche · 2,968
1 post
stop-fake.eu
@stopfakeeu · 27
1 post
Khokhol Media
@xmen_media · 538
1 post
Zᛟᛟ ᚹᛟLᛁᛏᛁᛈᛟᚢ
@z_polit_mislnevrotika · 2,214
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Thule Signal / Алексей Лёвкин / Молоток из РДК
@thulesignal · 28,312
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 9 September 2026
Авангард (АКС)
@avantguardia · 20,965
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 24 September 2026
Shaposhnikov News
@RostyslavS · 19,502
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 1 October 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Біле ⨁ Сонце” (@ZUNARM), 7,820 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ZUNARM.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.