Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Антонівський міст ➕

Channel

Антонівський міст ➕

@antonymist

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,526subscribers

-1,096 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001735638855
TypeChannel
Username@antonymist
Description🦾ТГ "Антонівський міст" створили у 2022 році, щоб українців об'єднувати, а окупантів розкидати по Дніпру🇺🇦
Created21 September 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/antonymist

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@tgp_news/11846629 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC@antonymist/89251 · this entry29 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC0.966 minutes
@tgp_news/11768220 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC@antonymist/88661 · this entry20 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC0.966.6 hours
@tgp_news/11752018 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC@antonymist/88520 · this entry18 Aug 2026, 18:11 UTC0.9513 minutes
@tgp_news/11823526 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC@antonymist/89064 · this entry26 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC0.9559 minutes
@tgp_news/11699612 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC@antonymist/88111 · this entry12 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC0.9314 minutes
@tgp_news/11857230 Aug 2026, 21:48 UTC@antonymist/89329 · this entry31 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC0.869.2 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@tgp_news6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9416 minutes@tgp_news (6–0)
@in_factum5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9723 minutes@in_factum (5–0)
@bahshiddemon6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.001.9 hours@bahshiddemon (6–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 11 of the 11 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 666 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

10,52612,25611,3916 August 202611 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 97 days, net -1,096. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,267–12,516 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 21:5110,526-4
10 Nov 2026, 03:1710,530-12
8 Nov 2026, 17:3710,542-14
7 Nov 2026, 12:1510,556-8
6 Nov 2026, 09:1910,564-10
5 Nov 2026, 12:3010,574-6
4 Nov 2026, 12:0710,580-18
3 Nov 2026, 09:2910,598-16
2 Nov 2026, 08:0410,614-14
1 Nov 2026, 05:5010,628-21
31 Oct 2026, 03:2610,649-22
30 Oct 2026, 01:5810,671-8
29 Oct 2026, 02:1010,679-10
27 Oct 2026, 23:3510,689-7
26 Oct 2026, 21:5110,696-25
26 Oct 2026, 01:1810,721-9
25 Oct 2026, 01:4610,730-17
24 Oct 2026, 00:0410,747-14
22 Oct 2026, 23:4910,761-16
21 Oct 2026, 20:2710,777first reading

Engagement

827 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.98%
avg views ÷ 10,526 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,050
262 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
262
of 827 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 260 of 262 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held827 (6 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total275,212
Reactions total14,936
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 22:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈45,500
Videos
≈22,400
Links
≈64,700

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5h 08m
Average length
1m 00s

Measured directly from 307 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

44,237 reactions across 822 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍8,35118.9%
🔥6,61915.0%
🙏5,66712.8%
❤3,7768.54%
🤬2,2215.02%
🤝1,7653.99%
👏1,6783.79%
💔1,3623.08%
⚡1,3212.99%
😡9832.22%
❤‍🔥8741.98%
😢8681.96%
🤡8671.96%
💯8531.93%
🤣7891.78%
👌7451.68%
🫡6131.39%
🤩6101.38%
🤯5811.31%
🖕4791.08%
23 further kinds3,2157.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 824 of the 827 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44,237 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 827 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 827 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @antonymist. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 827 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 28 of 262 posts held from the last 30 days (10.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 20:38 UTC659 views74 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🔴 Ми-8 🔴 МиГ-31 🔴 Ка-52 🔴 Ракетный корабль 🔴 Посол в США 👌Так тримати! 😀Антонівський міст ✙ | Зв'язок | Чат

🔥56👍9👏5👌2🤝1🤩1

11 Nov 2026, 20:28 UTC676 views13 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

😁 😀Антонівський міст ✙ | Зв'язок | Чат

🤣8👍2👏2🤩1

11 Nov 2026, 19:40 UTC863 views27 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🗺 Для багатьох мешканців Олешок починається новий етап життя. Після лікування евакуйовані жителі залишають лікарні та вирушають до нових домівок у Чернівецькій, Волинській та Закарпатській областях. На Буковині після двох років розлуки возз’єдналася родина. На Волині прихисток знайшло подружжя, чий будинок зруйновано. На Закарпатті прийняли дві родини літніх людей та чоловіка. Люди отримують необхідну допомогу, жи…

👍13🙏10⚡1❤1🤗1🤝1

11 Nov 2026, 19:00 UTC969 views60 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🇺🇦 Сили Оборони успішно просунулися східніше Федорівки на Великоновосільському напрямку! 😀Антонівський міст ✙ |Зв'язок| Чат

🙏48👍6🔥3🤝2❤1

11 Nov 2026, 18:50 UTC987 views53 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

🦾 Сили оборони України оприлюднили кадри знищення російський «Шахед» над Херсоном. Ще один ворожий дрон не досяг своєї цілі. Дякуємо нашим захисникам за захист українського неба! 😀Антонівський міст ✙ |Зв'язок| Чат

🔥40👍5🙏3⚡2🫡2🤝1

11 Nov 2026, 18:14 UTC≈1,070 views31 reactionsread 11 November 2026

🇭🇺🇷🇴Угорщина хоче закуповувати газ у Румунії як альтернативу російському Угорщина обговорює з Румунією можливість закупівлі газу з родовища Neptun Deep у Чорному морі. Початок видобутку там заплановано на 2027 рік. Будапешт розглядає цей проєкт як додаткову альтернативу імпорту російського газу та можливість диверсифікувати джерела енергопостачання. При цьому сам запуск видобутку на Neptun Deep ще не гарантує поста…

👍11⚡10🤝4❤2👏2👌1🫡1

11 Nov 2026, 17:24 UTC≈1,130 views79 reactionsread 11 November 2026

🇺🇦 Уражено ракетний корабель рф «Буян-М» «Наро-Фоминск», — СБУ. Це судно є носієм крилатих ракет «Калібр» і «Онікс». Його спустили на воду у 2022 році. Тут цікаво: Окрім того, перевіряється інформація щодо знищення бойових вертольотів рф, — додали в СБУ. 😀Антонівський міст ✙ | Зв'язок | Чат

👍43🔥27⚡5🤝3🤡1

11 Nov 2026, 16:50 UTC≈1,220 views93 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

👌"СВО" настільки йде по плану, що Омськ, який знаходиться за 2500 км від України, перебуває під атакою дронів вже більше 4 годин. 😀Антонівський міст ✙ | Зв'язок | Чат

🔥72⚡8👍7👌2👏2🫡2

11 Nov 2026, 16:50 UTC≈1,210 views86 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

🤝 Пам’ятаємо чотири роки тому, як перші українські захисники заходили у звільнений Херсон. А місто, яке вісім місяців жило в російській окупації, виходило на вулиці, щоб зустріти своїх. 🇺🇦 Сльози, обійми, синьо-жовті прапори й слова, на які чекали місяцями: «Наші прийшли!» ✊ Пам'ятаємо той день. Цінуємо волю. Боремося далі, щоб повернути наше українське. 😀Антонівський міст ✙ |Зв'язок| Чат

🙏48❤24🫡5🤝4⚡2🔥2🤡1

11 Nov 2026, 16:12 UTC≈1,180 views80 reactionsread 11 November 2026

🇩🇪 Омськ досі під атакою дронів! 😀Антонівський міст ✙ | Зв'язок | Чат

👏46👍18⚡8🤝3❤‍🔥2👌2🤣1

11 Nov 2026, 16:10 UTC≈1,190 views158 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

💇 «Ми будемо воювати до деокупації останнього сантиметра української землі, у межах території, яку Україна мала на момент здобуття незалежності», — Роберт «Мадяр» Бровді. 😀Антонівський міст ✙ |Зв'язок| Чат

❤117👍19❤‍🔥8⚡4🤝4🙏4👀2

11 Nov 2026, 15:40 UTC≈1,230 views69 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

🤗 Іноді діти одним простим реченням можуть сказати більше правди, ніж дорослі — довгими промовами. Без дипломатії, політкоректності, хитрих формулювань. 😉 Їхні слова часом такі влучні, що дорослим варто було б замислитися: може, якщо прислухатися, світ стане добрішим? 😀Антонівський міст ✙ |Зв'язок| Чат

❤38💯14🤗8🙏4😢3🤝1😭1

Showing the 12 most recent of 827 posts we hold for @antonymist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Kherson DRON
@Kherson_DRON · 20,165
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 September 2026
МОСТ: ХЕРСОН
@mostks · 22,472
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 September 2026
ПОЛУАВТОБИЯ
@poluavtobia · 54,198
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 September 2026
Херсонщина Моніторинг🇺🇦
@kherson_monitoring · 69,184
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Антонівський міст ➕” (@antonymist), 10,526 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/antonymist.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.