Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Crypto Coop

@C_Coop

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,956subscribers

+31 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001205521249
TypeChannel
Username@C_Coop
DescriptionTwitter: https://twitter.com/Crypto__Coop
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/C_Coop

Growth

5,9255,9565,940.56 August 2026 — 5,925 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,944 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,956 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,920–5,961 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 16:415,956+12
7 Aug 2026, 18:285,944+19
6 Aug 2026, 18:335,925first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.3%
avg views ÷ 5,956 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,740
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held23 (21 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total40,100
Reactions total592
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,670
Videos
23
Links
2,270

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

592 reactions across 23 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
34157.6%
👍15726.5%
👎345.74%
💔274.56%
🔥254.22%
😢40.676%
🆒20.338%
🎉10.169%
👌10.169%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 592reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 23 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @C_Coop. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC522 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⭐️ سرفرصت تسک‌های Epoch-5 پروژه Unicity رو بزنید! (لینک) #Unicity

15

8 Aug 2026, 20:40 UTC978 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎁 ایردراپ پروژه Vangrid با 9M$ فاندریزینگ 1⃣ وارد این (سایت) بشید و والت وصل کنید. 🔢 توییتر و دیسکورد کانکت کنید و تسک‌ها رو بزنید. 🔢 تسک توییت هفتگی داره که 200 پوینت میده. 🔢 یک اَپ هم داره که هنوز فرصت نکردم بررسی کنم، فردا میگم چیکار کنید. #Vangrid #Project_2026

👍268

8 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC≈1,170 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

😶‍🌫️ 16 سپتامبر ARC میره روی مین‌نت برید (اینجا) و ایونت مربوط به Mainnet رو ریجستر کنید و 20 پوینت بگیرید. #Arc

24

3 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC≈3,390 views46 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💚 اگر به کسی برنمیخوره که برید رای‌گیری جدید Reya رو شرکت کنید. (لینک) 🧡 کل قضیه‌ای هم که الان متاسفانه به اشتباه داره قضاوت میشه اینه که Reya به نسبت زمانی که ما شروع کردیم خیلی خلوت شده و پوینت جمع کردن با رقم‌های کم خیلی راحت شده درحدی که با مدیریت‌سرمایه و ریسک خیلی از افراد همخونی داره و فرصت خوبی محسوب میشه، همین! هیچ قضیه دیگه‌ای مبنی بر اینکه به سفیرها بابت ریوارد و رفرال چیزی گفتن وجود نداره و متاسفانه بعض

28👎13👍4👌1

2 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC≈3,810 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

شفاف‌سازی پروژه RoboStrategy ⬇️ ببینید این پروژه یه صندوق‌سرمایه‌گذاری هست و همونطور که روز اول گفتم توی نزدک هم لیست شده و تحت عنوان یک سهام با نماد BOT داره معامله میشه. شما بیای کلیت پروژه رو نگاه کنی با یه پروژه کریپتویی سروکار نداری، عملاً با یه پروژه طرفیم که تیمش توی کریپتو بشدت فعالیت داره و اخیراً هم اومده خودش رو قاطی دیسکورد و ... کرده و شبیه به پروژه‌های کریپتویی داره فعالیت میکنه و خیلی از افرادی که میش

22

1 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC≈1,580 views45 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

😁 جالبه عده‌ای که زمان آموزش InfoFi میگفتن حرفی از گروه انگیج نزن، گروه انگیج باعث میشه اکانت به مشکل بخوره و ساسپند بشه و هزار و یک بهانه میاوردن و خودشون رو دلسوز کامیونیتی معرفی میکردن الان هرروز دارن توی گروه‌های انگیج مختلف لینک میذارن و حسابی فعالیت میکنن. منم نمیگم گروه انگیج خوبه، اتفاقاً آدم اکانتی داشته باشه که بدون گروه بتونه توییت بزنه و فعالیت کنه خیلی خفنه ولی بیاید خودمون رو گول نزنیم رسیدن به اون درج

👍387

31 Jul 2026, 11:15 UTC≈1,670 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🐉 پروژه Canborsa داره وارد مارکت چین میشه و اخیراً Alibaba و ChangXin و TSMC و DRAM رو ادد کرده و با ترید روی اینها با ضریب بیشتری پوینت میده. (لینک) - حالت عادی به ازای هر 100$ والیوم 150 پوینت میداد ولی الان به ازای هر 100$ والیوم روی موارد گفته شده 250 پوینت میده. برای کسی که قصد داره هزینه کنه و روی این پروژه با ترید پوینت جمع کنه فرصت خوبیه. - علاوه بر این، بابت اولیت ترید روی هرکدوم از سهام‌های TSM و DRAM و B

👍162👎2

31 Jul 2026, 08:11 UTC≈1,680 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🤖 اون قضیه رول لول 6 پروژه #RoboStrategy با چت که دیشب معرفیش کردم کنسله. با چت خالی بهتون رول رو نمیده و باید توییت بزنید، سعی کنید محتوا درست حسابی توییت کنید که نظر تیم جلب بشه مخصوصاً الان که ارلی هست و خلوت‌تره و میشه بیشتر دیده شد. خودم هم امروز شروع می‌کنم. (لینک)

15👍11

31 Jul 2026, 07:59 UTC≈1,650 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎁 پروژه جدید Nucelus یعنی IRON Allies 🔴 این پروژه از اونهاست که 2 تا لیدربورد رو همزمان لانچ کرده، یعنی هم لیدربورد Contribution و هم لیدربورد Reputation داره. اگر نمی‌دونید یعنی چی و چه فرقی دارن این (پست) رو بخونید. - برای لیدربورد Reputation وایت‌لیست کالکشن NFT این پروژه توزیع میشه. رنک 1 تا 50 لیدربورد وایت‌لیست GTD (گارانتی) و رنک 51 تا 250 وایت‌لیست FCFS خواهند گرفت. این کالکشن هم 32 روز دیگه یعنی 1 سپتامبر

👍172

30 Jul 2026, 22:03 UTC≈1,540 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ خودم از فردا براش توییت می‌زنم و تولیدمحتوا میکنم و لینک‌هاشون رو توی روم robo-tweets میفرستم. از طرفی هم توی روم matal-mines چت میکنم تا لول‌آپ کنم. (لینک) ⚠️ فکر میکنم برای لول 6 رول میداد ولی الان تبدیل شده به فعالیت و تولیدمحتوا و... البته مطمئن نیستم اگر کسی به نتیجه قطعی رسید توی کامنت‌ها اعلام کنه. درهرصورت من چندروزی توی دیسکورد این پروژه فعالیت خواهم کرد. #RoboStrategy

21

30 Jul 2026, 21:30 UTC≈1,560 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎁 ایردراپ پروژه RoboStrategy چرا این پروژه رو انتخاب کنیم؟ چون بین پروژه‌های حوزه Robotics جزء تاپ‌ترین پروژه‌ها محسوب میشه، چون ارلی هست، چون سهام این شرکت توی نزدک داره معامله میشه، اخیراً هم 16M$ فاندریزینگ داشتند و درمجموع تیم خوبی هم داره چون اکثریت عضوی از VCهای مختلف هستند. 1️⃣ عضو (دیسکورد) پروژه بشید و وریفای کنید. 2️⃣ حداقل یک نفر رو به دیسکورد دعوت کنید و رول Robo Scout بگیرید. 3️⃣ اگر جزء تاپ 5 لیدربو

16

30 Jul 2026, 20:33 UTC≈1,290 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

😶‍🌫️ برای #Arc چیکار کنیم؟ - جدای از پوینت‌هایی که توی Arc House از طریق دیدن ویدئو و مقاله می‌گیرید سعی کنید توی اسپیس‌های توییتری یا جلسات دیسکورد هم شرکت کنید چون گاهی اوقات پوینت خوبی بین شرکت‌کنندگان توزیع میکنه! 🤖 داخل دیسکورد علاوه بر جلسات سعی کنید فعال باشید و بقیه رو راهنمایی کنید. حواستون باشه اسپم نکنید، احوال‌پرسی نکنید، راجع به موضوعات متفرقه صحبت نکنید، بجاش درباره Arc فنی و تخصصی صحبت کنید، به سوالا

27👎2

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @C_Coop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 237,765 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Coop” (@C_Coop), 5,956 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/C_Coop.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.