🚀 دیگه لازم نیست خودت ترید کنی! ربات کپی ترید آکادمی آراد V2 معاملات بهترین تریدرهای حرفهای رو بهصورت خودکار توی حسابت کپی میکنه 📈 +۸۰٪ سود ماهانه ⚡️ کاملاً خودکار 💎 فارکس | کریپتو | طلا 👇 همین الان شروع کن
❤18🥰9🎉7⚡5👍2🔥1

Channel
@arrad_group
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry
70,249subscribers
-3,796 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001932975332 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @arrad_group |
| Description | آکادمی اراد تنها رسانه معتبر ارزهای دیجیتال 📈اخبار و اموزش تا فرصت های سرمایه گذاری همه و همه رایگان در اختیارت قرار میدیم 💵دیگه بهانه ای برای شروع نکردن نخواهی داشت |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 66 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/arrad_group |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 5 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @arzdigitalb/323417 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC | @arrad_group/4428 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC | 0.95 | 17 hours |
| @arzdigitalb/3247417 Aug 2026, 05:42 UTC | @arrad_group/4562 · this entry17 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC | 0.93 | 4.9 hours |
| @arzdigitalb/3388423 Oct 2026, 06:50 UTC | @arrad_group/5890 · this entry23 Oct 2026, 10:54 UTC | 0.93 | 4.1 hours |
| @arzdigitalb/3427810 Nov 2026, 06:02 UTC | @arrad_group/6275 · this entry10 Nov 2026, 10:49 UTC | 0.92 | 4.8 hours |
| @arzdigitalb/328625 Sept 2026, 13:37 UTC | @arrad_group/4898 · this entry6 Sept 2026, 09:44 UTC | 0.91 | 20 hours |
| @arzdigitalb/3394126 Oct 2026, 06:14 UTC | @arrad_group/5951 · this entry26 Oct 2026, 09:14 UTC | 0.91 | 3.0 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @arzdigitalb | 51 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.92 | 18 hours | @arzdigitalb (51–0) |
| @Blockchain_ns | 39 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.91 | 15 hours | @Blockchain_ns (29–10) |
| @arznews | 31 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.91 | 18 hours | @arznews (31–0) |
| @crypto_cooki | 22 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.92 | under a minute | this entry (15–7) |
| @CRYPTOEMAD | 18 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.93 | 15 hours | @CRYPTOEMAD (16–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 140 of the 140 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 1,845 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 19:38 | 70,249 | -413 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 22:19 | 70,662 | -314 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 10:56 | 70,976 | -212 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:41 | 71,188 | -254 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 07:26 | 71,442 | -215 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 05:38 | 71,657 | -229 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 06:40 | 71,886 | -180 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 06:46 | 72,066 | -221 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 03:09 | 72,287 | -235 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 01:38 | 72,522 | -229 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 23:14 | 72,751 | -202 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 22:39 | 72,953 | -230 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 22:21 | 73,183 | -223 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 20:49 | 73,406 | -220 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 17:59 | 73,626 | -203 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 18:37 | 73,829 | -148 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 22:05 | 73,977 | -223 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 20:20 | 74,200 | -180 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 23:04 | 74,380 | -263 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 20:08 | 74,643 | first reading |
1,885 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 199 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,885 (4 August 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 877,462 |
| Reactions total | 37,931 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 20:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
60,708 reactions across 1,000 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10,575 | 17.4% | |
| 👍 | 10,435 | 17.2% | |
| 🔥 | 10,238 | 16.9% | |
| 🎉 | 10,128 | 16.7% | |
| 🥰 | 9,853 | 16.2% | |
| ⚡ | 9,473 | 15.6% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 0.01% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1,000 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60,708 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 25 September 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @arrad_group. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 25 September 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 627 posts held from the last 30 days (1.12%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🚀 دیگه لازم نیست خودت ترید کنی! ربات کپی ترید آکادمی آراد V2 معاملات بهترین تریدرهای حرفهای رو بهصورت خودکار توی حسابت کپی میکنه 📈 +۸۰٪ سود ماهانه ⚡️ کاملاً خودکار 💎 فارکس | کریپتو | طلا 👇 همین الان شروع کن
❤18🥰9🎉7⚡5👍2🔥1
امروز ZEC رو میخوایم بررسی کنیم که روند نزولی خوبی ساخته. در حال حاضر باید منتظر سیگنال بمونیم، اما حالا سیگنال چیه رو چارت روزانه این آلت کوین حریم خصوصی یه الگو براتون کشیدم که اگر اتفاق بیوفته، میشه سناریو معامله ما. بهتره قیمت به محدوده ۱۲۵۰ دلار برگرده، بعدش یه روند نزولی تو تایم فریم ۱ ساعته برامون بسازه، بعدش که روند نزولی رو دیدیم، ورود کنیم با استاپ لاس پشت سوئینگ قبلی و تارگت اول کف روزانه آخر. تو مسیر هم ب…
👍17🎉10⚡7❤6🥰5🔥3
خب خوب دقت کنید: دو محدوده قرمز رنگ جاهایین که روند کوچیک ما همچنان نزولی میمونه و بعد از رسیدن به اون ها میتونیم منتظر ریزش تا ۱۹۰۰ و ۱۷۰۰ دلار باشیم. اگر هر دو محدوده قرمز شکسته شد که دیدگاهمون عوض میشه و اونموقع میتونیم به فکر لانگ ETH باشیم. در ضمن، این محدودهها قطعی نیستن و ممکنه قیمت بیاد استاپ فیشینگ کنه و بعدش بریزه. هرجایی غیر از این دو نقطه هم برای من ارزش معامله نداره. راستی یه نکته: بهترین تحلیلگر دنیا…
⚡16❤14🥰14🔥7🎉6👍6
خب تمام الگوها حرفا اینارو بزارید کنار و خوب دقت کنید: دو محدوده قرمز رنگ جاهایین که روند کوچیک ما همچنان نزولی میمونه و بعد از رسیدن به اون ها میتونیم منتظر ریزش تا ۶۶ هزار دلار باشیم. اگر هر دو محدوده قرمز شکسته شد که دیدگاهمون عوض میشه و اونموقع میتونیم به فکر لانگ BTC باشیم. در ضمن، این محدودهها قطعی نیستن و ممکنه قیمت بیاد استاپ فیشینگ کنه و بعدش بریزه. هرجایی غیر از این دو نقطه هم برای من ارزش معامله نداره h…
❤18⚡9🎉9🥰9🔥6👍1
انتظار دارم توکن ZEC بعد از اینکه یه روند نزولی خوب ساخته، بیاد تو اصلاح و احتمالا نقطه ورود جدید بهمون بده؛ الان چیکار باید کرد؟ ✅ سناریوی معامله: محدوده ۱۲۰۰ دلار (یکم بالا یا پایین) میتونه ناحیه جذابی برای ورود به پوزیشن شورت باشه و در صورت باقی موندن قیمت زیر این محدوده، احتمال ادامه ریزش وجود داره. 🎯 تارگت: ۹۰۰ و ۷۰۰ دلار https://telegram.me/arrad_group
👍16⚡15🔥10🎉8❤6🥰5
با توجه به اصلاحی که در این مدت شاهدش بودیم. با توجه به تحلیلی که بنده انجام دادم از نظر تکنیکالی اینترنت کامپوتر روند صعودی خودش رو آغاز کرده. چیزی که نشانگر ها نشون میدن شاهد روند مثبتی خواهیم بود. ابزار فیبوناچی واکنش خوبی به عدد ۷۸.۶ نشون داده که محدوده کم ریسکی هست و البته احتمال پولبک به این محدوده محسوس هست جهت کف سازی. با توجه به رنج زدن قیمت در این مدت در اندیکاتور CCI و MACD روند مثبتی رو شاهد هستیم. لذا تو…
❤15👍15🎉12🥰8🔥6⚡5
سناریو اینه: قیمت ARIA خیلی اصلاحی و آروم برگرده به سمت محدوده ۰.۱۶ تا ۰.۱۸ دلار، چند کندل صعودی قوی بهمون بده و خریدار باشیم تا ۰.۲۵ و ۰.۳ دلار. ریسک معامله هم به عهده خودتونه https://telegram.me/arrad_group
❤14🥰11👍10🔥9🎉7⚡5
جنگ، مذاکره، تتر، بانک مرکزی آمریکا و … همگی تو روند قیمت طلا نقش دارن. یکی از مهمترین عوامل ریزشی فعلی قیمت طلا هم کاهش قیمت تتره. حالا بریم ببینیم چارت چی برامون داره! از نظر تکنیکال نمای کلی صعودیه، اما بعد از رسیدن قیمت طلا به گرمی ۲۷ میلیون تومن، روند نزولی شکل گرفته و قیمت تا مرز ۲۵ میلیون تومن هم پایین اومده. اگر این سطح شکسته بشه، طلا احتمالا تا محدوده ۲۴ الی ۲۳ تومن پایین میاد. اونموقع باید تصمیم گرفت که و…
🔥15👍13🎉11⚡10❤9🥰7
چارت روزانه LIT یه الگو براتون کشیدم که اگر اتفاق بیوفته، میشه سناریو معامله ما. بهتره قیمت بیاد تا محدوده ۲.۵۵ الی ۲.۳ دلار، بعدش یه روند صعودی تو تایم فریم ۱ ساعته برامون بسازه، بعدش که روند صعودی رو دیدیم، ورود کنیم با استاپ لاس پشت سوئینگ قبلی و تارگت اول سقف روزانه آخر. تو مسیر هم باید سیو سود کرد. رفقا هیچی مهمتر از مدیریت سرمایه نیست. به نظرم نهایت با ۱.۵ درصد سرمایهتون این معامله رو بگیرید https://telegram…
👍15🔥13❤12🎉6⚡4🥰4
دادههای آنچین کریپتوکوانت نشان میدهد پس از هک ۶٫۳ میلیارد دلاری بایننس در ۲۹ اکتبر، ذخایر داراییهای مختلف این صرافی رفتاری کاملاً متفاوت ثبت کردهاند. در حالی که ذخایر استیبلکوینهای ERC-20 با ۲۵٫۶ درصد افت از ۴۳ میلیارد واحد در اوایل اکتبر به ۳۲ میلیارد واحد فعلی رسیده، ذخایر بیت کوین این پلتفرم تنها ۷٫۶ درصد کاهش یافته و از ۷۲۸ هزار واحد به ۶۷۳ هزار واحد رسیده است. این حمله که بزرگترین هک تاریخ صرافیهای رمز…
🔥20❤16⚡11👍11🎉6🥰5
واگرایی مشخصی میان روند قیمتی اتریوم و میزان مشارکت در استیکینگ شبکه شکل گرفته است. در حالی که قیمت اتر در بایننس از محدوده ۲٬۸۰۰ دلار در اکتبر تا ۲٬۱۳۲ دلار افت کرده، نسبت استیکینگ شبکه به مسیر صعودی خود ادامه داده است. نرخ استیکینگ اتریوم ۲.۰ از ماه مه حدود ۴٫۳۲ درصد افزایش یافته و در حال حاضر تقریباً ۳۶٫۳۲ درصد از کل عرضه اتر استیک شده است. این روند حجم کوینهای در گردش و در دسترس برای معامله را محدودتر میکند که…
🔥23🎉11❤10⚡9🥰6👍4
میانگین متحرک ساده ۳۰ روزه (30D SMA) قراردادهای باز ریپل در تمامی نمادهای بایننس در ۸ نوامبر ۲۰۲۶ به ۴۵۳٫۶ میلیون دلار رسید که پایینترین سطح این شاخص از سپتامبر ۲۰۲۶ محسوب میشود. در همین تاریخ، قیمت ریپل به ۱٫۱۱ دلار رسیده بود. به دلیل ساختار ۳۰ روزه این میانگین، تغییرات آن نسبت به نوسانات کوتاهمدت بازار با تأخیر ظاهر میشود. قراردادهای باز ریپل تا اوایل اکتبر روندی صعودی داشت، اما از آن زمان به بعد نزولی شد. معم…
🎉15👍14❤12🥰10🔥7⚡6
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,885 posts we hold for @arrad_group. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@arrad_group edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 4 posts on @arrad_group as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 238 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 257 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ARAD GROUP | سیگنال آکادمی اراد” (@arrad_group), 70,249 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arrad_group.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.