Делюсь своими секретами красоты, рассказываю о своих исследованиях в области косметики и косметологии, делаю обзоры косметических продуктов и декоративной косметики.
Обратная связь: @AllaBeautyRuBot
Реклама: @AllaBeautyAds_Bot
РКН: https://clck.ru/3FWEY4
Created
Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
21 measurements spanning 21 days, net +1,711. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 52,260–58,205 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Aug 2026, 15:05
55,098
-45
27 Aug 2026, 15:34
55,143
-65
26 Aug 2026, 14:17
55,208
-163
25 Aug 2026, 15:42
55,371
-45
24 Aug 2026, 17:25
55,416
-223
23 Aug 2026, 04:03
55,639
-72
21 Aug 2026, 16:15
55,711
-122
20 Aug 2026, 14:44
55,833
-76
19 Aug 2026, 15:25
55,909
-206
18 Aug 2026, 17:15
56,115
-371
17 Aug 2026, 20:47
56,486
-1,033
16 Aug 2026, 18:04
57,519
+3,476
15 Aug 2026, 05:37
54,043
+484
14 Aug 2026, 01:16
53,559
+304
12 Aug 2026, 17:34
53,255
+102
11 Aug 2026, 20:52
53,153
+207
10 Aug 2026, 19:21
52,946
-309
9 Aug 2026, 16:01
53,255
-106
8 Aug 2026, 12:38
53,361
-25
7 Aug 2026, 10:13
53,386
first reading
Engagement
110 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.64%
avg views ÷ 55,098 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,660
110 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
110
of 110 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
110 (4 August 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
402,710
Reactions total
8,204
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 02:53 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,230
Videos
≈2,150
Links
≈2,950
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
29m 12s
Average length
1m 05s
Measured directly from 27 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,204 reactions across 110 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,400
53.6%
👍
3,804
46.4%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 110 of the 110 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,204reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 110 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 110 we hold a reading for · 0.9%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alla_bty. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 110 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
15.5%
17 of 110 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
17
posts carrying an erid · 17 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
3,770
over 17 measured posts
Median views · rest
3,720
over 93 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2RanynXMSJ7
1
13 August 2026
13 August 2026
2SDnjbxPqKR
1
12 August 2026
12 August 2026
2SDnjeEnGTM
1
20 August 2026
20 August 2026
2VtzqurS363
1
21 August 2026
21 August 2026
2Vtzqw6Zonj
1
9 August 2026
9 August 2026
2VtzqwZc4hp
1
16 August 2026
16 August 2026
2VtzqwtxitB
1
28 August 2026
28 August 2026
2Vtzqx4xkaw
1
20 August 2026
20 August 2026
2W5zFGCSvRf
1
22 August 2026
22 August 2026
2W5zFGDZjzH
1
10 August 2026
10 August 2026
2W5zFGtKqys
1
5 August 2026
5 August 2026
2W5zFGtdeWD
1
6 August 2026
6 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it. 5 further tokens are held for this entry and not listed here.
Measured over the 110 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
🅰️ Про мимические морщины и пептиды-миорелаксанты
Нужно понимать, что пептиды-миорелаксанты - это не ботокс. Но это очень полезная группа компонентов, и иногда они дают довольно быстрый визуальный результат.
Например, 🔹Deoproce Крем для лица антивозрастной со змеиным пептидом Multi-Function Syn-Ake Intensive Wrinkle Care Cream, 100 г.
На шее работает великолепно. И да, для шеи «змеиные» пептиды входят у меня в обяза…
🅰️ «Я помогаю знакомым: помогла при акне, дерматите, мимических морщинах... Расскажу чем»
Итак, личные истории.
1️⃣ Комби-кожа 40+
Встретила знакомую, и она посетовала, что в Babor всё масляное и перенасыщает её кожу. И она расстроена этим фактом, ибо верит, что этот бренд — лучшее, что может быть.
Однако я её постепенно обратила в свою веру 😁 и обещала скинуть рутину для комби-кожи 40+.
2️⃣ Дерматит
Жуткое хронич…
MASKOHOLIC - это бренд, на который точно стоит обратить внимание.
Я очень высоко оценила их осветляющие патчи. Редкий случай, когда кожа под глазами становится заметно светлее после первого применения.
Теперь ко мне в гости зашли тканевые маски с кислотами MASKOHOLIC. Я первый раз показала их в июле. Но с приближением осени, рука потянулась к ним с истовой силой и мне не терпится рассказать о результате, потому что…
🅰️ ЛУШИЕ НА ОСЕНЬ ПО ТИПУ КОЖИ И ЗАДАЧАМ
🔹 Для склонной к сухости
Мой любимка, так как лёгкий по текстуре, увлажняет и проявил себя как отличный защитник.
Увлажняющий солнцезащитный крем Dr. Althea Aqua Glowing Sunscreen SPF50+ PA++++
В составе: химические УФ-фильтры, ниацинамид, церамиды, пантенол, гиалуроновая кислота, экстракт морского винограда.
🔹 Для склонной к жирности — с неощущаемым финишем
Успокаивающий со…
🅰️ ДОБРОЕ УТРО! Смотрите ролик для настроение и с анонсом. А дальше:
🔹 Вы просили SPF лучшее , я обещала про закончилось и куплю ли снова, схемы и подборки, разбор по составу: всё об уходе за кожей!
Всех с завершением рабочей недели и всем великолепной пятницы! 😘☀️🦋
🅰️ Нужен ли SPF осень-зима
Ориентир очень простой: SPF особенно нужен при УФ-индексе 3 и выше. См.таблицу.
❄️ Что касается меня, то я не применяла спф в зимний период и ни разу не схватила пигментацию, не смотря на ретинол.
🍃 А вот осенью - было дело.
🤷♀️ Но с возрастом иммунитет падает, так что я не стала бы так категорична и рекомендовала в солнечные дни зимой спф, как и осенью: солнечно - спф, пасмурно - отдых…
🅰️ Обзор бренда Sungboon Editor
Впервые я обнаружила бренд, составы которого можно сравнить с Меди-пил по количеству компонентов и наличию антивозрастного.
Но если в Меди-пил в основном для сухой кожи, то в Sungboon Editor текстуры легкие и это идеально для склонной к жирности: комби, жирная.
Если интересует поросуживание, то про это здесь:
https://t.me/alla_bty/11953, а сейчас про анти-эйдж.
1️⃣ Sungboon Editor Ом…
Салонный уход за волосами, но только дома, теперь возможен💇🏼♀️✨
Серия ухода за волосами от Von-U Lamination Effect в этом нам поможет🔥
📌В серии четыре средства: шампунь, кондиционер, гель-филлер и ламинирующее масло. Это идеальный набор средств для тех, кто хочет видеть свои волосы ухоженными без похода в салон. Каждое средство решает свою задачу:
💜Шампунь для волос: деликатно очищает волосы за счёт мягких ПАВ,…
🅰️ Уход за шеей и декольте - интенсивная схема
Откуда тема
Вопросы подписчиц: «Подскажите уход интенсивный для декольте и шеи?», «А про уход за шеей сделать обзор». Ну что ж, ловите 🔽
1. Правильное очищение и нанесение
Смываем уход мягкой мочалкой и пенкой. Цепкие текстуры кремов для шеи сами по себе иногда не уходят.
2. Весь свой увлажняющий и пептидный уход наносим на шею полноценно
Не просто протягиванием, кром…
🅰️ ДОБРОЕ УТРО!
Смотрите ролик для настроения и пользы, а дальше я покажу много бьюти-находок для кожи и макияжа, а также расскажу, что у меня закончилось и куплю ли я это снова!
🔹 Будет также уход для шеи.
❓✍️ И поотвечаю на ваши вопросы. Например: нужен ли зимой SPF?
Всем великолепного четверга и чудесной погоды! 😘☀️🦋
🅰️ Эффект прорезиненности кожи - что это и кому подходит
Я обожаю эффект прорезиненности. Он даёт мне чувство защищённости и ощущение, что кожа как будто стала плотнее. Визуально также нравится, как она выглядит.
👀 Вижу, что не всем понятно, о чём речь. Объясняю:
Прорезиненность - это когда проводишь рукой по лицу, а она не скользит, будто на коже тонкая резиновая плёнка.
Это не сухость и не стянутость. Наоборот, пр…
🅰️ МИКРОИГЛЫ ИЛИ БОДЯГА. ЧТО ЛУЧШЕ?
Да, микроиглы - это в некотором смысле «цивилизованная родственница бодяги»
И микроиглы, и бодяга содержат спикулы — микроскопические игольчатые структуры. Но работают они по-разному.
🔹 Микроиглы в современных средствах очищены и встроены в косметическую формулу.
Они временно нарушают роговой слой и помогают активам проникать лучше.
Поэтому после VT Reedle Shot, medicube и подобн…
👍57❤23
Showing the 12 most recent of 110 posts we hold for @alla_bty. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@alla_bty edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
7 August 2026
Most recent edit
17 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 379,412 of 1,624,904entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Константин Дараган 🔶 Комментарий астролога️ @daragan_konstantin · 209,249#65
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Кулинарим с Таней 🌸 ЛУЧШИЕ РЕЦЕПТЫ🌿 @kulinarimstanej · 86,081 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 August 2026
ЛОСКУТОВА МАРИЯ @loskutova_maria · 93,291 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Алла Бьюти” (@alla_bty), 55,098 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alla_bty.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.