Channel
@braincosmetic
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,670subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001615340914 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @braincosmetic |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/braincosmetic |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:03 | 2,670 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 08:11 | 2,669 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 2,672 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 2,677 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:31 | 2,679 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:20 | 2,679 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 4 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (4 June 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 134 |
| Reactions total | 12 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
150 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 81 | 54.0% | |
| 👍 | 52 | 34.7% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 10.7% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 0.667% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 150reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Протестировала этого малыша - лосьон для тела. Очень приятный продукт: лёгкий, не липкий, быстро впитывается, хорошо смягчает, с тонким приятным ароматом. По составу тоже неплох: каскад эмолентов даёт смягчение и хорошую текстуру, масла питают кожу, плюс комплекс экстрактов для обновления, увлажнения и улучшения текстуры кожи. Если кто-то искал хорошее средство для тела, могу рекомендовать 🩷
👍7❤5
В выходные дачная тема очень актуальна и сегодня поговорим про компост 😂 Ну и про косметику, конечно, тоже, я ещё не совсем оголтелый дачник))) Наткнулась на бьюти-новость про экологичное производство масок для лица полезное для почвы. Тема загрязнения планеты микропластиком очень актуальна на сегодняшний день и косметическая индустрия вносит туда свою лепту. Миллиарды синтетических масок для лица каждый год попол…
👍9🔥5❤4
Video message, posted without a caption
Некоторое время назад я проводила опрос, чтобы понять какие темы вас интересуют. 💸 Финансы и энергия оказались самыми актуальными и я подготовила для вас интерактив: ПОЧЕМУ ВАШ ДОХОД НЕ РАСТЁТ. Вам нужно будет нарисовать простой рисунок, через который я увижу, что в вашем подсознании не даёт вам получать больше денег и помогу вам понять ограничения и шаги, которые приведут вас к росту дохода. Добавляйтесь и участв…
💊1
Signed Васильева Елена, психолог
Ну и отзыв на тонирующие средства. Трижды пыталась протонировать свои осветленные волосы маской Estel. Результат - 0! Вообще, никакого эффекта. Нашла у себя мусс от Kemon - с 1 раза все окрасилось. Причем очень удобная форма мусса прекрасно распределяется и наносится. Ну и в целом, Kemon мне всегда крайне импонировал: и уходы, шампуни прекрасные, и красящие продукты просто отличные 👍
❤3👍2
Я 2 года осветляла волосы и они мне за это спасибо не сказали. Решила, что достаточно, буду отращивать свой цвет и осветляться это не моё. У всех разные волосы, мои очень плохо это воспринимают. Теперь, конечно, цвет интересный, в субботу пойду к парикмахеру делать его более естественным 😁
👍8
Люблю я скандалы в косметике, что ж поделать 😁 Принесла вам один недавний, который мне попался буквально на днях. Помните историю с бензолом в кремах La Roche-Posay? Так вот, это только один из немногих официально выявленных случаев. Сейчас на российском рынке творится что-то очень неприятное и всему виной наши "любимые" маркетплейсы. Официальные данные такие: Роспотребнадзор в апреле этого года забил тревогу: на…
❤20👍6
В какой сфере жизни вы бы хотели что-то изменить?
The shares total 174%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Что вы уже пытались делать, чтобы решить свой запрос?
The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какие ещё направления вам сейчас откликаются, помимо психологии?
The shares total 197%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Что вас останавливает от того, чтобы начать работать со специалистом прямо сейчас?
The shares total 157%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Дорогие мои! Мне нужна Ваша помощь 🙏 Хочу понять интересна ли вам тема. Поэтому прошу вашей максимальной активности в опросе. Всего 4 вопроса, чтобы тыкнуть пальчиком. Займёт 1 минуту ⬇️
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @braincosmetic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
В какой сфере жизни вы бы хотели что-то изменить?
The shares total 174%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Что вы уже пытались делать, чтобы решить свой запрос?
The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какие ещё направления вам сейчас откликаются, помимо психологии?
The shares total 197%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Что вас останавливает от того, чтобы начать работать со специалистом прямо сейчас?
The shares total 157%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 645,220 of 1,624,174entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Формула красоты” (@braincosmetic), 2,670 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/braincosmetic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.