Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for أفكار بحثية

Channel

أفكار بحثية

@afkarbahthea

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

26,166subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001486567151
TypeChannel
Username@afkarbahthea
Descriptionقناة أفكار بحثية في العلوم الشرعية؛ أسألُ الله أن يجعلها منارة خيـر، ودليل رُشد وأن يتقبَّلها، ويتقبَّل ما فيها، إنه سميع مجيب؛ اللهم اجعل ما نَشرتُ في هذه القناة صدقة جارية عن والدَيَّ اللهم تقبل.
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/afkarbahthea

Growth

26,15726,16626,161.511 August 2026 — 26,157 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,158 subscribers13 August 2026 — 26,159 subscribers14 August 2026 — 26,163 subscribers16 August 2026 — 26,166 subscribers11 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 4 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,156–26,167 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 03:1726,166+3
14 Aug 2026, 14:1426,163+4
13 Aug 2026, 07:0426,159+1
12 Aug 2026, 05:4226,158+1
11 Aug 2026, 21:4626,157first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.89%
avg views ÷ 26,166 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,590
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.141%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held21 (24 July 202613 August 2026)
Views total54,360
Reactions total54
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 05:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
661
Videos
36
Links
670

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

54 reactions across 15 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4787.0%
👍713.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 23:45 UTC≈1,160 views8 reactionsread 16 August 2026

لديّ فكرة بحثية حديثية تتعلق بدراسة شبهات المستشرقين وأعداء السنة النبوية والرد عليها ردًّا علميًا منهجيًّا، وهي فكرة تصلح لأن تكون موضوعًا لرسالة ماجستير. ويحتاج هذا المشروع إلى باحثٍ واسع الاطلاع على تراث المستشرقين وكتاباتهم ودراساتهم، ومتمكن من تتبع مقالاتهم وكتبهم ومناهجهم الفكرية، ومعرفة أبرز رواد المدرسة الاستشراقية واتجاهاتها في نقد السنة النبوية. يمكنني مساعدة الباحث في جرد أبرز الشبهات والمسائل التي أثار

8

9 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC≈2,200 views4 reactionsread 16 August 2026

#أفكار_حديثية #أفكار_فقهية #افكار_جديدة #تصلح_رسائل_ماجستير #تصلح_أطاريح_دكتوراه #تصلح_أبحاث_ترقية ابنُ التين الصفاقسي المتوفي سنة (611هـ) من أعلام المحدثين وهو من فقهاء المالكية، وصاحبُ شرحٍ نفيسٍ على صحيح البخاري، أفاد منه الحافظ ابن حجر في «فتح الباري» إفادةً واسعة. وقد أورد ابن حجر في «فتح الباري» مئات الآراء والنقول عن ابن التين، ناقلًا عنه ومناقشًا ومتعقبًا له في مواضع متعددة. ومع فقدان معظم شرح ابن التين، تغد

4

7 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC≈2,220 views5 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @AL_yaseen11

فكرة بحثية حديثية: (القواعد العقدية في فهم أخبار الشيطان الغيبية الواردة في القرآن والسنة النبوية) ومن أمثلتها: الأصل في أخبار الغيب إثباتها على ظاهرها، الغيب لا يثبت إلا بدليل صحيح من كتاب أو سنة، عدم إدراك الكيفية لا يقتضي نفي الحقيقة، كل ما صح به الخبر عن الله ورسوله في باب الغيب وجب قبوله والتسليم له، الأصل في الأخبار الخبرية الحقيقة، ولا يُصار إلى المجاز إلا بقرينة معتبرة، إثبات الأسباب الغيبية لا ينافي إثبات ال

👍5

7 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC≈2,070 views3 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @AL_yaseen11

فكرة بحثية حديثية: (منهج المحدثين في تفسير الأخبار الغيبية عن الشيطان الواردة بألفاظٍ حسيةٍ) وهي نوعان: أخبار تتعلق بتأثير الشيطان في الإنسان: بالُ الشيطان في أذنه، ويعقد على قافية رأسه ثلاث عقد، ويبيت على خيشومه، ويجري من ابن آدم مجرى الدم، ويمس المولود حين يولد. وأخبار تتعلق بأحوال الشيطان وأفعاله: يضع عرشه على الماء، ويخنس عند ذكر الله، ويضحك من التثاؤب، ويفر عند سماع الأذان وله حُصاص، ويدني منه من فرّق بين المرء

3

7 Aug 2026, 13:41 UTC≈1,690 views1 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @AL_yaseen11

فكرة بحثية تفسيرية: (وسائل الشيطان في إضلال الإنسان الواردة في القرآن الكريم: دراسة تفسيرية موضوعية) وتشمل: الوسوسة، والتزيين، والوعد، والتمني، والتخويف، والصد، والإزلال، والإغواء، والنزغ، والاستفزاز، والاستهواء، والإنساء، والتلبيس، والأمر بالفحشاء، والأمر بالبخل، والدعوة إلى الكفر والشرك، وإثارة العداوة والبغضاء، وغير ذلك من الوسائل التي كشفها القرآن وبيَّن سبل الوقاية منها. #فكرة_بحثية_كل_يوم_جمعة @AL_yaseen11

1

7 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC≈1,790 viewsread 16 August 2026
Photo

#أفكار_تفسيرية #تصلح_مشاريع_بحثية #تصلح_أطاريح_دكتوراه #تصلح_رسائل_ماجستير #تصلح_أبحاث_ترقية #رابط_تحميل_البحث الذي ذكر هذه التوصيات: https://t.me/fahad20201441/10081 #من_لهذه_الأفكار #زكاة_العلم_نشره

6 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC≈1,980 views3 reactionsread 16 August 2026

#فكرة_بحثية كثيرًا ما ينقل البيهقي عن شيخ شيخه أبي علي الحافظ، وهو الحسين بن علي بن يزيد النيسابوري (ت 349هـ)، ينقل عنه في علل الأحاديث، وجرح الرواة، فلا أدري هل دُرس هذا الموضوع أم لا؟ ينفع علل وينفع جرح وتعديل وينفع بيان آثار وجهود ومنهج. تجمع من الكبرى للبيهقي، وأيضًا من كتب الحاكم النيسابوري، فهو شيخه المباشر. #الفكرة_لصاحبها د. زكريا الكبيسي #من_لهذه_الأفكار #زكاة_العلم_نشره

👍21

5 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC≈2,200 views2 reactionsread 16 August 2026

#أفكار_بحثية_متنوعة #تصلح_أطاريح_دكتوراه #تصلح_رسائل_ماجستير يُعدُّ الدكتور عبد الكريم بكار من أبرز المفكرين التربويين في العصر الحديث، وقد قدَّم مشروعًا فكريًا وتربويًا متكاملاً امتد عبر عشرات المؤلفات التي عالجت قضايا التربية، وبناء الشخصية، والأسرة، والنهضة، والوعي، وإصلاح الإنسان، بلغة تجمع بين التأصيل الإسلامي والاستفادة من معطيات الفكر التربوي المعاصر. وعلى كثرة مؤلفاته، واتساع دائرة تأثيرها في الميدانين التر

2

5 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC≈2,140 viewsread 16 August 2026

#أفكار_بحثية_حديثية عنوانات بحثية صغيرة: ° مرويات شرب العسل دراسة نقدية. ° مرويات طاعة المرأة لزوجها دراسة نقدية. °مرويات أثر العين على حياة الإنسان دراسة نقدية. ° حديث«مروا أولادكم بالصلاة وهم أبناء سبع...» دراسة نقدية. ° مرويات اطلاق لفظ المصحف على القرآن الكريم. دراسة نقدية. ° الهدي النبوي في الألوان دراسة تحليلية. #الأفكار_لصاحبها د. زكريا الكبيسي #من_لهذه_الأفكار #زكاة_العلم_نشره

31 Jul 2026, 12:36 UTC≈2,930 views9 reactionsread 16 August 2026

#فكرة_تربوية_دعوية #تصلح_بحث_ترقية (التساؤلات التربوية التي أوردها الإمام ابن قيم الجوزية (ت ٧٥١هـ) وأجاب عنها في كتابه الداء والدواء -جمعاً ودراسة-) كتاب الداء والدواء عظيم النفع والفائدة وقد أورد الإمام ابن قيم الجوزية في كتابه ما يقارب عشرة فنقلات فإن قيل، لعل باحث ينشط ويدرسها في بحث ترقية فهذا لطيف ومليح، والله المستعان والموفق للصواب. #من_لهذه_الفكرة #زكاة_العلم_نشره

9

31 Jul 2026, 12:13 UTC≈2,710 viewsread 16 August 2026
Photo

#أفكار_بحثية_متنوعة #أفكار_بحثية_حديثية #تصلح_رسائل_ماجستير #تصلح_أطاريح_دكتوراه من توصيات أطروحة بعنوان: المرفوع حكماً دراسة تأصيلية تطبيقية (دكتوراه) - د. عمار الصياصنة #رابط_تحميل_الأطروحة https://t.me/Moswarat1/7199 #من_لهذه_الأفكار #زكاة_العلم_نشره

30 Jul 2026, 08:33 UTC≈2,680 views1 reactionsread 16 August 2026

#فكرة_دعوية #تصلح_رسالة_ماجستير (التربية الروحية عند الإمام أحمد الرفاعي «ت:578هـ» وأثرها في بناء الداعية الرباني –في كتابه "البرهان المؤيد" -دراسة دعوية تحليلية-) #من_لهذه_الفكرة #زكاة_العلم_نشره

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @afkarbahthea. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,041,243 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

قناة وظائف | فرص العمل 🟦
@fu1sa · 108,467
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“أفكار بحثية” (@afkarbahthea), 26,166 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/afkarbahthea.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.