Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مَحابِر أُصُولية

Channel

مَحابِر أُصُولية

@mahabir

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,845subscribers

+148 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001136224638
TypeChannel
Username@mahabir
Created14 September 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/mahabir

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,6975,8455,7716 August 2026 — 5,697 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,697 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,702 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,698 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,706 subscribers19 August 2026 — 5,715 subscribers22 August 2026 — 5,721 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,717 subscribers28 August 2026 — 5,714 subscribers31 August 2026 — 5,713 subscribers2 September 2026 — 5,727 subscribers8 September 2026 — 5,723 subscribers12 September 2026 — 5,722 subscribers16 September 2026 — 5,721 subscribers2 October 2026 — 5,719 subscribers13 October 2026 — 5,728 subscribers16 October 2026 — 5,739 subscribers20 October 2026 — 5,754 subscribers23 October 2026 — 5,758 subscribers26 October 2026 — 5,773 subscribers29 October 2026 — 5,777 subscribers1 November 2026 — 5,781 subscribers4 November 2026 — 5,785 subscribers7 November 2026 — 5,833 subscribers11 November 2026 — 5,845 subscribers6 August 202611 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 98 days, net +148. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,675–5,867 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 16:445,845+12
7 Nov 2026, 22:565,833+48
4 Nov 2026, 22:385,785+4
1 Nov 2026, 14:165,781+4
29 Oct 2026, 08:495,777+4
26 Oct 2026, 03:515,773+15
23 Oct 2026, 06:365,758+4
20 Oct 2026, 01:275,754+15
16 Oct 2026, 22:405,739+11
13 Oct 2026, 21:415,728+9
2 Oct 2026, 02:585,719-2
16 Sept 2026, 08:215,721-1
12 Sept 2026, 17:365,722-1
8 Sept 2026, 06:385,723-4
2 Sept 2026, 21:455,727+14
31 Aug 2026, 02:165,713-1
28 Aug 2026, 11:155,714-3
25 Aug 2026, 07:075,717-4
22 Aug 2026, 08:145,721+6
19 Aug 2026, 07:275,715first reading

Engagement

59 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.9%
avg views ÷ 5,845 subscribers
Avg views / post
930
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
9
of 59 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 October 2026
Posts held59 (29 July 2026 – 30 October 2026)
Views total7,437
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 19:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 9 posts held from the last 30 days (44.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

30 Oct 2026, 17:29 UTC594 viewsread 4 November 2026

بناءًا على تصويتكم سيكون التطبيق الأصولي على حديث واحد وهو قوله صلى الله عليه وسلم: ((الحلال بين، والحرام بين، وبينهما مشبهات لا يعلمها كثير من الناس، فمن اتقى المشبهات استبرأ لدينه وعرضه، ومن وقع في الشبهات: كراع يرعى حول الحمى يوشك أن يواقعه، ألا وإن لكل ملك حمى، ألا إن حمى الله في أرضه محارمه)) فاستخرجوا دلالات الألفاظ منه، وما ظهر من القواعد الأصولية وميدان التطبيق أعظم ميادين الرسوخ في العلم، فإليكم الأمر يا …

30 Oct 2026, 13:55 UTC709 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

من المراجع النافعة في المُدارسة:

30 Oct 2026, 13:29 UTC635 viewsread 4 November 2026
Poll

رأيكم في أن يكون حديثاً واحداً كل أسبوع، أم حديثين؟

  1. حديثين.49%
  2. حديث واحد.51%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Oct 2026, 13:28 UTC610 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🔹الأسبوع الثاني: تطبيق القواعد الأصولية على السنة النبوية. 1- قوله صلى الله عليه وسلم: (الحلال بين، والحرام بين، وبينهما مشبهات لا يعلمها كثير من الناس، فمن اتقى المشبهات استبرأ لدينه وعرضه، ومن وقع في الشبهات: كراع يرعى حول الحمى يوشك أن يواقعه، ألا وإن لكل ملك حمى، ألا إن حمى الله في أرضه محارمه). 2-قال النبي ﷺ: (لا حسد إلا في اثنتين: رجل آتاه الله مالا فسلط على هلكته في الحق، ورجل آتاه الله الحكمة فهو يقضي به…

30 Oct 2026, 12:47 UTC619 viewsread 4 November 2026

🔹القواعد الأصولية التي استُدل عليها بهذين الحديثين من السنة النبوية: الحديث الأول: قال صلى الله عليه وسلم: ( نَضَّرَ اللهُ امرَأً سَمِعَ مَقالتي فوعاها, فأدَّاها كما سَمِعَها, فَرُبَّ مُبَلَّغٍ أَوْعَى من سامع). ١. مسألة حجية خبر الواحد استدل الشافعي بالحديث على قبول خبر الواحد. وجه الدلالة: أن النبي ﷺ ندب الفرد إلى حفظ حديثه وتبليغه؛ فلو لم يكن خبر الواحد حجة على من بلغه، لم يتحقق المقصود من هذا التبليغ في إثبات…

22 Oct 2026, 21:25 UTC≈1,110 viewsread 4 November 2026

🔹📚 الأسبوع الأول: استشهد الأصوليون بهذه الأحاديث على المسائل والقواعد الأصولية 1.قال صلى الله عليه وسلم: ( نَضَّرَ اللهُ امرَأً سَمِعَ مَقالتي فوعاها, فأدَّاها كما سَمِعَها, فَرُبَّ مُبَلَّغٍ أَوْعَى من سامع) ٢-قال صلى الله عليه وسلم: (لا تَزالُ طائِفةٌ مِن أُمَّتي ظاهِرينَ على الحَقِّ، لا يَضُرُّهم مَن خَذَلَهم، حتَّى يَأتيَ أمرُ اللهِ وهم كَذلك). شاركونا في أي المسائل ذُكرت، وماهو وجه الدلالة منها.

22 Oct 2026, 21:22 UTC≈1,190 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

طابت أوقاتكم بكل خير وعلى بركة الله نبدأ مُدارستنا العلمية، التي نهدف من خلالها إلى ربط السنة النبوية بالقواعد الأصولية، إحياءً لملكة الاستنباط. الفكرة: نطرح حديثين للمُدارسة ليلة الجمعة من كل أسبوع، بالتناوب بين التأصيل والتطبيق، فيضمن الأسبوع الأول أدلةً على القواعد الأصولية، ويضمن الأسبوع الثاني أحاديثاً تكون ميداناً للتطبيق، على النحو التالي: ✨الأسبوع الأول: نطرح حديثين من قبيل الأدلة على المسائل الأصولية. …

15 Oct 2026, 19:19 UTC≈1,970 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

قريباً✨ دعواتكم بالتيسير والسداد، واكتبوا لنا تطلعاتكم وآرائكم تحت المنشور.

4 Oct 2026, 16:46 UTC≈3,050 viewsread 4 November 2026

🔹 فكرة بحثية: مسالك الجمع بين روايات الإمام أحمد في القواعد الأصولية والمقصد منها: دراسة الروايات المنقولة عن الإمام أحمد بن حنبل- رحمه الله- في المسائل والقواعد الأصولية التي يبدو في ظاهرها التعارض أو الاختلاف، والكشف عن المناهج التي اتبعها الأصوليون في الجمع بينها، وعن القرائن التي تكشف مراد الإمام رحمه الله. حسب بحثي القاصر لم أجدها مبحوثة بهذه الكيفية، وإنما وجدت رسائل قريبة منها.

1 Oct 2026, 12:02 UTC≈2,760 viewsread 4 November 2026

نُقلت عن الإمام الشافعي قاعدتان أصوليتان من الأهمية بمكان، وحصل بينهما تعارضٌ ظاهري، فمن الأصوليين من قال بوجود التعارض، وإسقاط الاحتجاج بهما، ومنهم من قال بدفع التعارض، وبيان الفروق، وقد كتبت لكم خلاصة القول في بيانهما، والفرق بينهما على الوجه التالي: القاعدة الأول: ترك الاستفصال في حكاية الحال مع قيام الاحتمال، ينزل منزلة العموم في المقال، ويحسن به الاستدلال . ومعنى القاعدة: حيث لم يستفصل النبي-صلى الله عليه وسلم…

30 Sept 2026, 10:39 UTC≈1,610 viewsread 4 November 2026

سؤال عابر: من الأمور التي لم أجد لها فائدةً تُذكر بقدر الجهد المبذول في سبيلها، هي ترتيب المراجع في هامش البحث وِفق الأقدم وفاةً من العلماء إلى الأحدث، صدقاً ما الفائدة؟ وهل تركها مما يضر بالبحث والباحث والقارئ؟ فعلتها في بحث الماجستير، لكن استثقلتها جداً في بحث الدكتوراه، فأفيدونا مشكورين.

Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @mahabir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Oct 2026, 13:29 UTCFinal Results51 voters

رأيكم في أن يكون حديثاً واحداً كل أسبوع، أم حديثين؟

  1. حديثين.49%
  2. حديث واحد.51%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 01:14 UTCAnonymous Poll62 voters

بشرونا عن سيركم؟✨📚

  1. في نعيم العِلم والإتقان32%
  2. في محاولات اللحاق42%
  3. متعثرون في السير27%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 30 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

سمو الاوائل (جامعيين)📚📝📚
@qodorat2 · 87,053
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
قناة | مِهاد الأصول
@mihad_osol · 19,821
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 October 2026
قناة الشيخ حسن بخاري
@hasanbukhari · 21,166
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 September 2026
دردشة بحثية🖋📔
@dardashaat · 21,175
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 September 2026
أفكار بحثية
@afkarbahthea · 26,836
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 September 2026
قناة الدراسات العليا بجامعة الملك عبدالعزيز
@DGS_kau · 20,343
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 September 2026
قناة جامعة الملك خالد KKU
@kkueduTG · 27,361
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 September 2026
أخبار الدراسات العليا ووظائف الجامعات.
@drasatolya · 72,433
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
🍃🌸 التفاؤل عبادة 🌸🍃
@abadtaltfaol · 35,441
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
كتب قانون
@k1r1a1r1 · 26,148
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مَحابِر أُصُولية” (@mahabir), 5,845 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mahabir.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.