Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Аналитический центр ВЦИОМ

@WCIOMofficial

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

17,146subscribers

+47 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001104078477
TypeChannel
Username@WCIOMofficial
DescriptionОфициальный Telegram-канал Аналитического центра ВЦИОМ Аналитика, данные, исследования, рейтинги, экспертиза press@wciom.com Правила чата: https://graph.org/Pravila-chata-AC-VCIOM-06-29
Created30 January 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/WCIOMofficial

Growth

17,09917,14617,122.55 August 2026 — 17,099 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,099 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,105 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,125 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,127 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,123 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,137 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,134 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,146 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,092–17,153 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:2917,146+12
11 Aug 2026, 17:4217,134-3
10 Aug 2026, 15:4817,137+14
9 Aug 2026, 15:3117,123-4
8 Aug 2026, 14:0317,127+2
7 Aug 2026, 14:4417,125+20
6 Aug 2026, 15:0117,105+6
6 Aug 2026, 02:1817,099no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:0017,099first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.2%
avg views ÷ 17,146 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,070
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held35 (23 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total247,510
Reactions total27,066
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 00:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
7,900
Videos
180
Links
8,520

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 37s
Average length
1m 32s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

19,304 reactions across 27 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👎17,27189.5%
🤔1,0185.27%
👍2601.35%
😁2101.09%
🔥1750.907%
💯1520.787%
840.435%
🕊720.373%
😐310.161%
👏110.057%
🍾70.036%
🎉50.026%
🤯50.026%
🥰30.016%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27,066reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC≈1,170 views29 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🌳 Инфляция пошла в рост Индекс восприятия инфляции в июле с.г. составил 64 п. После трехмесячного снижения показатель резко подрос: доля тех, кто считает, что инфляция очень высокая, возросла (+3 п.п.). 🔗 Подробный интерактивный график с годами доступен на сайте АЦ ВЦИОМ. Эмпирической базой для расчета индексов служат данные всероссийского опроса. Индекс восприятия инфляции показывает, насколько россияне ощущают и

🔥98😁7💯5

12 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC≈1,300 views66 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

💬 Как ограничения зарубежных магазинов приложений влияют на лояльность россиян к iPhone, рассказывает директор по социальным исследованиям Аналитического центра ВЦИОМ Андрей Даудрих: 💬Смартфон давно перестал быть просто средством связи – для россиян это одновременно финансы, покупки, общение, госуслуги и навигация. Именно поэтому ограничения в работе привычных приложений со стороны зарубежных магазинов приложений бо

👎3711😁8👍5🔥4💯1

12 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC≈1,530 views83 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

97% владельцев смартфонов в той или иной степени знают об удалении российских приложений в зарубежных магазинах. 56% считают такие действия со стороны иностранных компаний некорректными. Пользователи Apple ощущают последствия ограничений сильнее, чем владельцы Android: 🟢 69% лично затронуты ограничениями (среди пользователей Android – 37%) 🟢 56% обеспокоены ситуацией (против 29%) 🟢 52% признают, что пользоваться сма

👎49👍13🔥7💯6😁52🍾1

11 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC≈2,180 views115 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Валерий Федоров: «Если вы тревожитесь – значит, вы живы» 👨 Генеральный директор Аналитического центра ВЦИОМ, декан факультета социальных наук и массовых коммуникаций Финансового университета при Правительстве РФ Валерий Федоров в интервью журналу «Москвич» рассказал о том, как российское общество переживает период глубоких перемен. «Тревожность – это механизм адаптации к меняющейся, нестабильной, труднопредсказуемо

👎73😁24👍9🔥6👏2💯1

10 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC≈2,460 views46 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🌲 Безработица снова на подъеме? 👥️ Индекс безработицы в июле с.г. составил -30 п. Доля россиян, отмечающих в ближайшем кругу 1-3 увольнения в последние 2-3 месяца, возросла (+2 п.п.). 🔗 Подробный интерактивный график с годами доступен на сайте АЦ ВЦИОМ. Эмпирической базой для расчета индексов служат данные всероссийского опроса. Индекс безработицы демонстрирует актуальность проблемы безработицы. Показатель рассчи

😁19💯13👍6👎6🔥2

10 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC≈2,130 views38 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Вам знакома фраза: «Да ладно, еще поработает!»? Так вот, к газовым баллонам ее лучше не применять О рисках использования газовых баллонов и необходимости системного контроля за их оборотом рассказывает руководитель практики «Бизнес + Территории присутствия» АЦ ВЦИОМ Иван Грузинов: 💬Данные Аналитического центра ВЦИОМ фиксируют тревожную картину. Бытовые газовые баллоны используют (или когда-либо использовали) 68% ро

💯14👍10🔥9👎5

10 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC≈2,000 views27 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

💬 О необходимости создания системы учета и контроля газовых баллонов рассказывает генеральный директор АО «РТ-Оператор системы учета баллонов» Тимур Ахмадинуров: 💬В результатах исследования АЦ ВЦИОМ есть цифры, масштаб которых трудно оценить вне дополнительного «рыночного» контекста. Например, в сумме 6% опрошенных сообщили о том, что с ЧП из-за газовых баллонов сталкивались они сами, либо их близкие или знакомые.

👍9💯7🔥7👎2🤯2

10 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC≈2,160 views32 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

68% россиян имеют личный опыт использования газовых баллонов в быту; 39% пользуются ими в настоящее время, в том числе 16% постоянно. Осведомленность о безопасности среди нынешних пользователей низкая: 🟢 Знают точный срок службы баллона (21%) и период технического освидетельствования (18%) 🟢 Не знают 34% и 44% соответственно 52% россиян в той или иной степени опасаются ЧП из-за газовых баллонов. При этом лично или

👍13💯9🔥52🤯2👏1

7 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC≈3,000 views35 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🔎🔎🔎🔎🔎 Дом-мечта или дом-призрак: сценарии развития жилищной сферы в России Когда говорят о жилье будущего, в массовом сознании возникают образы футуристического дизайна, «умного дома» и продвинутых экостандартов. Однако по-настоящему важен не набор технологий и даже не квадратные метры сами по себе, а то, насколько модель рынка недвижимости отвечает ключевым жизненным запросам россиян: когда отделиться от родителе

👍12😁10🔥54👎3💯1

7 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC≈28,800 views5,442 reactionsread 13 August 2026

🌲 Рейтинги доверия политикам, оценки работы Президента и Правительства, поддержка политических партий 🟢 Уровень одобрения деятельности 27 июля – 2 августа Президент РФ – 65,9% (+0,5 п.п. за неделю) Премьер-министр – 46,0% (+1,6 п.п. за неделю) Правительство России – 44,8% (+2,2 п.п. за неделю) 🟢 Скажите, пожалуйста, Вы доверяете или не доверяете…? (закрытый вопрос) 27 июля – 2 августа Владимир Путин – 72,3% (+1,7 п

👎5,340🕊47😁24👍14😐87👏1🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC≈3,460 views35 reactionsread 13 August 2026

«Футурологический конгресс-2036: Образование» Суверенитет мышления, или Как не стать вассалами чужих идей Разговор об искусственном интеллекте и цифровизации в образовании ставит перед нами более общие вопросы: по чьим лекалам мы перекраиваем образование и строим наше будущее? Кто именно будет жить в этом будущем? Если торфяной пожар ИИ выжигает «подложку» школы, то чем ее заменить? Что надо сделать, чтобы XXI век

👍12🔥9👎6💯53

6 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC≈2,730 views23 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Сохранение сотрудников в период нестабильности 🌳 На площадке АЦ ВЦИОМ состоялось заседание Комитета по корпоративному управлению и инвестициям на тему: «Трансформация бизнеса: роль и актуальные механизмы корпоративного управления». 👨 Иван Грузинов, руководитель практики «Бизнес+Территории присутствия» Департамента социальных исследований АЦ ВЦИОМ, рассказал о сохранении кадров в эпоху турбулентности: 🟢 37% работаю

🔥11💯6👍4👎2

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @WCIOMofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@WCIOMofficial edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
11 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 4,778 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 74 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q1512375 on Wikidata, read 9 August 2026
LabelVTSIOM
DescriptionState-owned polling institution
X / Twitter@WCIOM
Official sitehttp://wciom.ru

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Аналитический центр ВЦИОМ” (@WCIOMofficial), 17,146 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WCIOMofficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.