11 measurements spanning 9 days, net +517. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,609–35,298 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 23:52
35,218
+121
13 Aug 2026, 17:38
35,097
-11
12 Aug 2026, 17:54
35,108
+299
11 Aug 2026, 14:33
34,809
-49
10 Aug 2026, 13:41
34,858
-54
9 Aug 2026, 15:11
34,912
-46
8 Aug 2026, 11:18
34,958
+140
7 Aug 2026, 09:22
34,818
+130
6 Aug 2026, 11:50
34,688
-13
6 Aug 2026, 01:50
34,701
no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:00
34,701
first reading
Engagement
114 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
26.9%
avg views ÷ 35,218 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,470
114 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.268%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
114
of 114 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 105 of 114 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
114 (4 August 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
1,079,815
Reactions total
2,735
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,900
Videos
≈1,190
Links
≈13,200
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,320 reactions across 85 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👎
927
40.0%
👍
441
19.0%
😁
325
14.0%
🥰
171
7.37%
👏
143
6.16%
🙈
132
5.69%
😭
82
3.53%
🤩
40
1.72%
👀
32
1.38%
🤔
27
1.16%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 105 of the 114 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,735reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 114 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Государственный обвинитель попросил Псковский городской суд приговорить заместителя председателя партии 🕙«Яблоко» иноагента Льва Шлосберга к 12 годам и 1 месяцу лишения свободы.
Политику вменяют «дискредитацию использования ВС РФ» и «распространение заведомо ложной информации о российской армии». Обвинение строится на видеоролике, который был размещен Шлосбергом в «Одноклассниках» в январе 2025 года. Сам Шлосберг, н…
Петербургские депутаты и кандидаты от 🐻«Единой России» готовятся восстановить доступ к своим страницам в соцсетях после тотальной зачистки. По словам замруководителя регисполкома партии, аккаунты проходят строгий юридический аудит на наличие нарушений авторских прав и внешних ссылок.
Массовое удаление или скрытие страниц в партии официально объяснили «координированными хакерскими атаками». Однако вероятнее всего пар…
Самарский областной суд отменил регистрацию действующего депутата 🟥Михаила Матвеева на выборы в Госдуму.
Ранее мы писали, что причиной стал иск кандидата от❤️Партии пенсионеров по Промышленному одномандатному округу №163 ❤️Анны Саранцевой, которая обвинила его в нарушении авторских прав.
👉 Подписаться на Пять партий
🎤🐻 То, что произошло с компанией Wildberries, — акт ужасной террористической атаки.
#мнение_партийца
Артем Кирьянов, зампред комитета Госдумы по экономической политике:
Последствия ударов Киева по гражданской инфраструктуре затронули сотни тысяч людей, прежде всего предпринимателей и их семьи. Для многих продавцов работа на платформе — основной источник дохода и возможность развивать свое дело. Предприниматели — э…
#цитатадня
👔Не устану повторять: тарифы ЖКХ — это настолько мутная тема, что банальный аудит приведёт к тому, что тарифы поднимать не потребуется.👔
🟨 Михаил Делягин
👉 Подписаться на Пять партий
Депутат Госдумы от партии 🧴 «Новые люди» Ксения Горячева и кандидат в депутаты ГД от 💅 ЛДПР по Перовскому одномандатному округу Москвы Иван Курбаков вступили в публичный конфликт вокруг женской повестки. Курбаков назвал деятельность оппонентки «политическим косплеем» и высмеял её работу над «Манифестом женщин».
Поводом для атаки стали события нескольких недель назад. Курбаков публично заявил, что женщина в порыве мо…
#фотодня
Заместитель председателя Фонда развития социальных инноваций в гражданском обществе «Генезис» 🧴Анастасия Павлюченкова и замруководителя фракции "Новых людей" в Госдуме 🧴Сардана Авксентьева.
👉 Подписаться на Пять партий
ЦИК разрешил жителям Москвы голосовать на бумажном бюллетене без предварительных заявлений на выборах в Госдуму. Ранее предполагалось, что для голосовать "по-старинке" смогут только те, кто заранее уведомят комиссию. Председатель Мосгоризбиркома Ольга Кириллова уточнила, что комиссия напечатает бумажные бюллетени для 100 % зарегистрированных избирателей. Этот запас обеспечит возможность выбора формата непосредственно…
В Свердловской области избирком отказал партии 👩🦽 «Родина» в регистрации списка кандидатов на выборах в региональное Законодательное собрание.
Комиссия пояснила причину: партия не сдала полный пакет документов, включая обязательные подписные листы. Еще 6 августа избирком предупреждал политиков о нехватке бумаг, но замечания так и не устранили.
Важно, что список партии 🕙"Яблоко" при этом свердловский облизбирком за…
❗️Важное объявление для исследователей политологов!
Если у вас есть интересные и качественные научные работы на политическую тематику, которые были опубликованы, пишите нам в бот обратной связи @FivePartiesBot. Мы готовы проанализировать ваш научный труд и опубликовать его на главном канале о политических партиях и внутрипартийных раскладах.
Внимание: все материалы проходят редакторский отбор
👉 Подписаться на «Пят…
Более 1600 участников и ветеранов специальной военной операции выдвинуты кандидатами на выборах всех уровней в единый день голосования. Из них 186 человек претендуют на мандаты в Госдуму: 110 идут по федеральным спискам, 76 — по одномандатным округам.
Кандидаты с боевым опытом на выборах в Госдуму распределились следующим образом:
🐻«Единая Россия» забрала львиную долю: 52 человека в федеральном списке и 28 одноманда…
👎15👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 114 posts we hold for @agendarussia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кого бы вы НЕ хотели видеть в следующем созыве Госдумы?
Опрос для жителей Ставропольского края. #уходящие_натуры
🐻Кузьмин Михаил Владимирович — округ №65 (Ставропольский)23%
🐻Тимофеева Ольга Викторовна — округ №66 (Невинномысский)22%
🐻Казакова Ольга Михайловна — округ №67 (Кавминводский)20%
🐻Бондаренко Елена Вениаминовна — округ №68 (Георгиевский)21%
🐻Иванов Владимир Валерьевич — (избран по партийному списку)21%
🐻Лавриненко Алексей Федорович — (избран по партийному списку)21%
🐻Кармазина Раиса Васильевна — (избрана по партийному списку)23%
🟥Бифов Анатолий Жамалович — (избран по партийному списку)44%
🟨Каноков Тимур Борисович — (избран по партийному списку)38%
🧴Самылин Ярослав Алексеевич — (избран по партийному списку)11%
The shares total 244%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 114 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 4,084 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 105 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
СТРАНОВЕД @stranoved · 116,764 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 14 August 2026
ДАВАНКОВ // Вице-спикер Госдумы @davankov · 220,321 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
Солодовников. Кратко @solodovnikovia · 136,665 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
Яна Лантратова @lantratovaDOBRO · 190,647 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 August 2026
СЛУЦКИЙ @slutsky_l · 221,899 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Yana Lantratova(en.wikipedia.org) “…Oblast,” 1st class (2022).{{Cite web |title=Пять партий |url=https://t.me/agendarussia/10961 |access-date=2026-06-08 |website=Telegram}}
* Order…” read 9 August 2026
Лантратова, Яна Валерьевна(ru.wikipedia.org) “…перед Херсонской областью» I степени (2022){{Cite web |url=https://t.me/agendarussia/10961 |title=Яна Лантратова. Пять партий |access-date=2023-07-20…” read 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пять партий” (@agendarussia), 35,218 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/agendarussia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.