Ваш проводник в мире современной политики. Разберемся, кто настоящий слон, а кто — просто погулять вышел в поле решений, определяющих судьбы России и мира.
По вопросам рекламы: @bosteleg и @TgPodbor_bot
Обратная связь: @elephant_room_bot
Created
28 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 63,857–64,073 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 07:19
63,976
+4
16 Sept 2026, 02:59
63,972
+16
14 Sept 2026, 07:17
63,956
-18
12 Sept 2026, 16:01
63,974
-34
10 Sept 2026, 14:41
64,008
+42
7 Sept 2026, 10:39
63,966
-50
4 Sept 2026, 13:41
64,016
+11
3 Sept 2026, 01:34
64,005
-23
1 Sept 2026, 22:25
64,028
-16
31 Aug 2026, 18:48
64,044
+17
30 Aug 2026, 15:57
64,027
-21
29 Aug 2026, 12:24
64,048
+16
28 Aug 2026, 14:08
64,032
+19
27 Aug 2026, 17:02
64,013
+10
26 Aug 2026, 14:53
64,003
+31
25 Aug 2026, 12:39
63,972
+14
24 Aug 2026, 10:08
63,958
-31
22 Aug 2026, 20:37
63,989
+69
21 Aug 2026, 07:55
63,920
+38
20 Aug 2026, 08:22
63,882
first reading
Engagement
357 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.3%
avg views ÷ 63,976 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,850
191 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.397%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
191
of 357 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
357 (4 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
1,499,670
Reactions total
5,958
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 03:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,890
Videos
≈612
Links
≈1,590
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
27m 15s
Average length
45s
Measured directly from 36 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
10,457 reactions across 345 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤡
1,819
17.4%
❤
1,715
16.4%
🔥
1,407
13.5%
👎
1,383
13.2%
👍
1,347
12.9%
💯
1,303
12.5%
😡
1,124
10.7%
🤣
349
3.34%
🫡
10
0.096%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 357 of the 357 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,810 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 357 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 357 we hold a reading for · 0.8%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @LastOfRus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 357 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Слоны обсуждают: как поделят комитеты Госдумы после выборов?
После выборов 2026 года в Госдуме может заметно измениться баланс при распределении комитетов. Более того, к старым добавится два новых — первый сосредоточится на сфере цифровых технологий и искусственного интеллекта, а второй займется вопросами административного и уголовного законодательства.
Политический консультант, руководитель рабочей группы РАСО по …
С 21 по 25 сентября в Госдуму было внесено 7 законопроектов. «Наши слоны» собрали наиболее знаковые инициативы и предложения.
🔹 «О внесении изменений в статью 8 Федерального закона "О государственном оборонном заказе" и статью 36 Федерального закона "О таможенном регулировании в Российской Федерации и о внесении изменений в отдельные законодательные акты Российской Федерации"»
Законопроект, предлагающий обязать голо…
США готовят нападение на Кубу
По информации CBS News, Сухопутные войска США в ближайшее время могут перебросить до шести разных подразделений в группу войск, отвечающую за латиноамериканское направление.
Что интересно: с трибун ГА ООН Дональд Трамп угрожает уничтожить Иран как нацию, в то же время втихаря Вашингтон подгребает под себя Гренландию, про Венесуэлу мы вообще молчим. И вот сейчас, видимо, настала пора Ку…
Дебургеризация началась в Киеве
Как пишут местные паблики, в ходе налета отечественных «Гераней» были уничтожены склады McDonald's под Киевом.
Все ведь знают, что «Вкусно — и точка» — канон, а все остальное — ересь? Да?
UPD. Украинские СМИ пишут, что в Киеве не осталось целых складов McDonald's.
Слоны в МАХ
Всем сестрам по серьгам
ЦИК России подвела окончательные итоги выборов в Госдуму. Несмотря на происки различных злопыхателей и «киберсволочей», кампания прошла на высочайшем организационно-методическом уровне с рекордной явкой 59,8%. Ключевой вопрос — распределение мандатов:
🐻 «Единая Россия» — 349 (конституционное большинство);
🟥 КПРФ — 37;
🟦 ЛДПР — 23;
🧴 «Новые люди» — 19;
🟨 «Справедливая Россия» — 17.
Кроме…
Лазеры против дронов
США выделили $500 млн на разработку лазерного оружия, которое сможет эффективно уничтожать беспилотники. Среди аргументов — высокая стоимость современных средств ПВО.
Относительно небольшая сумма, выделенная на стартап, говорит о том, что в убойную силу лучей верят не все. Или помнят из «Звездных войн», как имперские штурмовики из своих лазеров не могли попасть вообще ни в кого.
Слоны в МАХ
На фоне потока новостей о нападениях медведей из Социального фонда РФ пришла информация о том, что самое популярное мужское имя в этом году — Михаил.
«Наши слоны» не знают, вдохновила ли тревожная информация молодых родителей на выбор именно этого имени, но тренд фиксируют.
Миши наступают по всем фронтам.
Слоны в МАХ
РИА пообещали СВО в Литве. А потом передумали
На сайте федерального издания появилась статья с заголовком «Россию ждет еще одна СВО. Она будет очень короткой». Автор публикации — Александр Носович, член Совета по внешней и оборонной политике (СВОП), один из соучредителей клуба «Валдай», где регулярно выступает Владимир Путин.
Автор упомянул и про «ядерку», и про войну с остальной Европой, но главный вывод — Литва н…
Президент Южной Кореи назвал Зеленского предателем
Зеленский с трибун ГА ООН проболтался о том, что Киев передал Южной Корее военнопленных из Северной Кореи (с какой стати, интересно?). Видимо, президент Юга понимает все спорные, а вот его украинский коллега — нет. В твитере Ли Чжэ Мен высказался:
Государственными делами нужно заниматься ради страны и народа, а не ради интересов или популярности власти и правителя.…
Пока слоны спали: главные новости за прошедшую ночь
🐘 ВС РФ поразили в Борисопле место сборки БПЛА, где хранились двигатели для «Фламинго», сообщили в Минобороны. Также удары нанесены по портовой инфраструктуре в Одессе;
🐘 Новошахтинский завод нефтепродуктов поврежден в результате воздушной атаки на Ростовскую область, сообщил губернатор Слюсарь;
🐘 Правительство России одобрило проект федерального бюджета на следу…
Опять пятерка
Министр просвещения Сергей Кравцов заявил о сокращении числа школьников с неудовлетворительными оценками в России:
У нас уменьшается количество двоечников, у нас улучшаются результаты ЕГЭ...
По мнению главы ведомства, подобная динамика свидетельствует об изменениях в качестве школьного образования.
«Наши слоны» радуются, что в дневниках школоты становится меньше «гусей». Однако нелишним будет напомни…
Семейную ипотеку усложнили
Ставки по ипотеке теперь привяжут к количеству детей в семье — от 2 до 12%. Также ограничат срок действия льготной ставки, она будет предоставляться максимум на 15 лет.
Изменения следующие:
— 10% — для семей с одним ребенком младше семи лет, максимальная сумма кредита — 6 млн рублей;
— 8% — для семей с двумя детьми, если хотя бы одному из них меньше семи лет, лимит — 8 млн рублей;
— 6%,…
🤣14👎13🔥11🤡4😡4❤2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 357 posts we hold for @LastOfRus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 44 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Комитетчик @kmnedr · 21,150 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 September 2026
PostNews @postnewsru · 43,043 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
В Стране @stranavvvv · 57,322 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
Лучше и не скажешь @goodphrase · 36,891 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
Банковская тайна @banksecret · 58,568 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
The Гращенков @thegraschenkov · 163,136 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
Россия — это я! @merussiatg · 50,138 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
Мослента @moscowlenta · 70,349 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 August 2026
Медиастанция @mediastanciacom · 116,287 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
Региональная политика @regpol · 78,094 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 August 2026
Блохи в свитере @cyberfreek · 82,277 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
Дело в + @DeloPlus · 131,990 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
Акценты @emphasises · 26,114 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 September 2026
Бульварное кольцо @boulevard_ring · 71,827 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 August 2026
вот это Бизнес @votBusiness · 120,146 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026
Владимир Кошелев @koshelevvladimir · 34,622 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 3 September 2026
Украина без вариантов/Україна без варіантів @NewNovorossia · 54,108 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 24 August 2026
Звучит продажно @prodano5 · 73,079 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 August 2026
Вопрос финансов @VoprosFin · 99,388 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 August 2026
Бульдоги под ковром @kremlin_bulldogs · 103,294 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 August 2026
Банковская Правда @BankingTruth · 32,217 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 September 2026
Fineconomics @fineconomics · 42,699 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
Говорит и показывает Москва @moscow_on_air · 71,415 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 August 2026
НОП. Научно-образовательная политика @NOPpolicy · 42,310 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 84 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Наши слоны” (@LastOfRus), 63,976 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LastOfRus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.