МраZі🇷🇺 атакують Києв👹будьте обережні 🙏🏻
💔15

Channel
@chaos_v_zakoni
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
18,266subscribers
-1,832 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001256890164 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chaos_v_zakoni |
| Created | 19 October 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 57 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chaos_v_zakoni |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 10:16 | 18,266 | -51 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 04:46 | 18,317 | -43 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 07:18 | 18,360 | -9 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 05:49 | 18,369 | -27 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 03:28 | 18,396 | -19 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 00:10 | 18,415 | -27 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 00:18 | 18,442 | -14 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 01:42 | 18,456 | -13 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 02:00 | 18,469 | -7 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 03:36 | 18,476 | -20 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 05:31 | 18,496 | -12 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 04:05 | 18,508 | -9 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 02:31 | 18,517 | -22 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 22:50 | 18,539 | -10 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 22:06 | 18,549 | -13 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 18:38 | 18,562 | -11 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 20:29 | 18,573 | -16 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 15:44 | 18,589 | -24 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 11:48 | 18,613 | -10 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 09:15 | 18,623 | first reading |
68 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 68 (18 July 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 56,630 |
| Reactions total | 494 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 16:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,736 reactions across 68 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 313 | 18.0% | |
| ❤ | 229 | 13.2% | |
| 🤬 | 226 | 13.0% | |
| 🖕 | 179 | 10.3% | |
| 👎 | 161 | 9.27% | |
| 🤣 | 113 | 6.51% | |
| 👍 | 91 | 5.24% | |
| 💊 | 64 | 3.69% | |
| 👀 | 56 | 3.23% | |
| 💯 | 45 | 2.59% | |
| 😢 | 32 | 1.84% | |
| 🤔 | 29 | 1.67% | |
| 🤪 | 22 | 1.27% | |
| 🔥 | 21 | 1.21% | |
| 🥰 | 21 | 1.21% | |
| 😱 | 18 | 1.04% | |
| 💔 | 16 | 0.922% | |
| ❤🔥 | 15 | 0.864% | |
| 🤯 | 14 | 0.806% | |
| ✍ | 13 | 0.749% | |
| 18 further kinds | 58 | 3.34% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 68 of the 68 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,736 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 30 posts held from the last 30 days (13.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
МраZі🇷🇺 атакують Києв👹будьте обережні 🙏🏻
💔15
Директор НАБУ,керівник САП й вбивця-барига 🤡🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️тепер я бачив все😂😂😂 Гадаю зібрали на новий ренж ровер Стерненку😁
🤣13💊3👍2👻2🥴1
🔴 За фігуранта «Карфагена» Володимира Ценова внесли 15 млн грн застави. Йдеться про першого заступника начальника Департаменту стратегічних розслідувань Нацполіції. За версією слідства, він забезпечував поліцейське прикриття шахрайських колцентрів. Суд передбачив електронний браслет, здачу закордонних паспортів та інші процесуальні обмеження. Гучні затримання вже побачили. Тепер чекаємо результатів у суді. Сплата …
🤔8
На тлі нових матеріалів «Карфагена», де, за даними слідства, фігурують високопосадовці СБУ, з’являється новина: фонд Стерненка підписав меморандум із НАБУ та САП. Для одних – підозри, для інших – спільне фото та публічна подяка. Контраст ефектний. Сторони прямо зазначають, що співпраця почалася раніше. Але на нинішньому інформаційному тлі така новина виглядає особливо виграшно для репутації Стерненка. Допомога вій…
👍3❤1🐳1
Друг Олега Татарова,очільник міністерства внутрішніх справ Іван Вигівський дякує очільнику наркокартеля😁😁 тепер я бачив все😎
🤣15
У Комишувасі вже 40 загиблих. Понад 30 людей можуть залишатися під завалами. Третю добу рятувальники розбирають завали після російського удару по гімназії, де видавали гуманітарну допомогу. Поліція бере зразки ДНК у родичів зниклих, щоб встановити особи загиблих. Тим часом з’явилася інформація про можливе затримання генерала СБУ Сергія Дуки. У новому епізоді «Карфагену» НАБУ і САП повідомили про угруповання щонайме…
😢28🤔1
⚡️ «Карфаген». Детективи прийшли з ухвалою суду. У НАБУ кажуть, що їм погрожували зброєю. За заявою НАБУ, високопосадовець СБУ не допускав детективів до місця обшуку та погрожував застосувати вогнепальну зброю. На місце також прибули спецпризначенці СБУ. За даними ЗМІ, йдеться про Сергія Дуку. Також повідомляють про обшуки у двох інших посадовців СБУ – Антона Кравчука та Олександра Ковальчука. За версією НАБУ і СА…
🤬11
🤡депутат з Дніпра Даніло Міро хизується краєвидами моря🤦🏻♂️. Ну а що, Слуга народу теж має право на відпочинок,й обовʼязково виставити це у Фейсбуці☝🏼😁
🤬19❤2
«Якщо чоловіку 18 років – це військовозобов’язаний громадянин: людина уже свідома і виконує завдання. В СРСР і в Україні люди служили з 18-ти років». – Федір Веніславський, народний депутат України. Легко міркувати про чужу готовність до фронту з депутатського крісла. Веніславський – член оборонного комітету Ради. Він має голос, коли парламент вирішує, кого можуть мобілізувати. Поки він має депутатський мандат, за …
❤25😁14❤🔥2🤯1
Епоха брехні продовжується 🤦🏻♂️тобто він не бачив людину з офісу президента яка відповідає за звʼязок з правоохоронцями 🤡 Думаємо закінчить гірше ніж його попередник Руслан Кравченко🐀
👍7❤1🤬1
🗣️ 10–11 листопада в Абу-Дабі відбудуться тристоронні переговори щодо України за участю США та рф – Віткофф. Ну нарешті. А то ми вже скучили за «конструктивним діалогом» і «певним прогресом», подробиці якого розкривати не можна. 🤝 Чекаємо на головний прорив – домовленість про наступні переговори. З новою датою та старими обіцянками. А потім вийде Трамп і скаже, що ми ще ближче до завершення війни. Настільки близьк…
👍10🥰4💯2❤🔥1😢1
⚠️ Не забувайте про власну безпеку! На тлі останніх резонансних подій не варто забувати про головне. У мережі попереджають про можливу масовану атаку цієї ночі, а в повітряному просторі України вже фіксують значну кількість ворожих БпЛА. Закликаємо не нехтувати сигналами повітряної тривоги та за можливості заздалегідь перейти до безпечних місць. Подбайте про своїх близьких, особливо дітей та людей похилого віку. Жодн…
❤15❤🔥1🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @chaos_v_zakoni. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 October 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Хаос в законі” (@chaos_v_zakoni), 18,266 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chaos_v_zakoni.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.