Channel
@oza99m
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
79subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001804103774 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @oza99m |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/oza99m |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:53 | 79 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 79 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 10 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (10 July 2025 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 23 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 22:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
12 reactions across 9 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 12 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2025 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
حکم نقاشی و تصویرگری موجودات زنده و بررسی حکم عکس و فیلم گرفتن توسط دوربین عکاسی یا فیلمبرداری و بررسی مسئله تصاویر موجود بر روی وسایل خانگی و لباس و پوشاک و موضوع مجسمه و عروسک و تولید تصویر و فیلم توسط هوش مصنوعی.
😁1
الحمو الموت در این روزگار و شرایطی که در آن زندگی میکنیم، اگر چهارچشمی مراقب فرزندت نباشی و لحظهای از هوشیاری و تیزبینی غافل گشوی، سرت کلاه میرود و فرزندت در میان موجهای سهمگینِ فتنهها و خطرها گم میشود؛ مگر آنکه رحمت الهی شامل حالش شود. امروز، خطر از هر سو فرزندان ما را تهدید میکند؛ در خانه، در گوشیهای همراه، در فضای مجازی، در کوچه و خیابان، در مدرسه، در مهمانیها و حتی در قاب تلویزیون. بر دوستان فرزندانتا…
😁1
m: فهم قرآن بدون تفسیر و مراجع لغوی، امکانپذیر نیست. ✍برخی تصوّر میکنند که میتوانند قرآن را بدون مراجعه به تفاسیر و فرهنگهای لغت، تدبّر کرده و درک عمیقی از آن داشته باشند. امّا این تصوّر همانقدر نادرست است که کسی بخواهد شعری را که ۱۴۰۰ سال پیش به زبانی دیگر سروده شده، بررسی کند و در معنای آن تأمّل نماید، درحالیکه هیچ آشنایی با آن زبان ندارد. آیا چنین چیزی ممکن است، درحالیکه بسیاری از واژگان، عبارات و جملات آ…
😁1
سلام حدود شش سال است که با فرقه موسوم به «قرآنیون» در حال بحث و مناظره هستم. در این مدت، به نکاتی درباره روشهای گفتوگوی با این فرقه نامسلمان رسیدهام که به نظر میرسد آگاهی از آن برای برادران مسلمان مفید باشد 1. ورود به عقیده طرف مقابل : اعضای این فرقه معمولاً در ابتدای بحث تلاش میکنند ابتدا از عقیده شما مطلع شوند (شیعه، سنی و …). به محض اینکه موضع اعتقادی خود را بیان کنید، وارد چارچوب فکری شما میشوند و پرسشها…
😁1
پاسخ به یک شبهه در باب صحیح البخاری با یک مناظره (ترجمه از زبان عربی) دوستی به من گفت: بخاری چه زمانی متولد شد؟ گفتم: در سال ۱۹۴ هجری. گفت: پیامبر ﷺ چه زمانی وفات یافتند؟ گفتم: سال ۱۱ هجری. گفت: آیا معقول است که بخاری بعد از این همه فاصله زمانی بیاید و سنت را جمعآوری کند؟! گفتم: آیا قاری، شیخ دکتر علی حذیفی، امام حرم نبوی شریف را میشناسی؟ گفت: چه ارتباطی با بخاری دارد؟ گفتم: فقط جواب بده. گفت: بله، او را میشناسم …
😁1
نقد دوم بر اباطیل زندیق سنه ای راجع به مسئله قیاس.
😁1
چند نکته در مورد ابومحمد سنه ای ،و مناظره ای که با ماموستا خالد عزیزی داشتن👆 زبان کوردی..
😁1
برخی از جماعت «منکرین سنت» با افتخار و خوشحالی فراوان میخواهند مچ امام بخاری را بگیرند و اعتبار ایشان را زیر سؤال ببرند .. میگویند: بخاری صحیح خود را در طول ۱۶ سال در بین ۶۰۰ هزار حدیث نوشته، سپس میایند ثانیه و دقیقههای این ۱۶ سال را محاسبه میکنند که چطور برای هر حدیث توانسته همهی راوی و اسناد و .. را بررسی کرده باشه 😅 نتیجه میگیرن این کتاب بخاری نیست!! بدبختا عقل این رو ندارند که بخاری در سن ۱۸ سالگی قبل از نوش…
😁2
ببینید مضرات ایستاده آب خوردن، و با یک نفس خوردن👆 حالا احادیث پیامبر رو به یاد بیارید که نهی کرده از اینکه ایستاده آب بنوشیم و فرموده جرعه جرعه بنوشیم.. پیامبر صلی الله علیه وسلم از نوشیدن در حالت ایستاده خودداری کرده است. انس رضی الله عنه روایت کرده است که پیامبر صلی الله علیه وسلم از نوشیدن در حالت ایستاده نهی کرده است - به روایت مسلم (2024). پیامبر صلی الله علیه وسلم آب را با سه جرعه مینوشید و میگفت، سه بار …
شیخ احمد السید این جریان را در کتاب تثبیت حجیة السنة ذکر کردهاند. ص ۱۰۹ به بعد ...
اشاره به جریان عالم مسیحی که متخصص تاریخ در قرن بیستم است به اسم أسد رستم. ایشان طی یک تحقیق و پژوهش راجع به منهجی راسخ و مطمئن درباۀ تعامل با اخبار تاریخی به این نتیجه رسید که: لا منهجیة أعلی من منهجیة المحدثین. هیچ روشی بالاتر از روش محدثین وجود ندارد. در واقع، محدثین با دقت و اصول خاصی به جمعآوری و تحلیل احادیث پرداختهاند و این روششناسی آنها به عنوان برترین منهج و روش شناخته میشود. این را در کتاب مصطلح التأر…
ولی الله دهلوی،صاحب كتاب(حجة الله البالغة ،یعنی حجت رسای خدا) میگوید: پدرم به من سفارش کرد که قرآن را چنان بخوانم که گویی بر من نازل میشود. پس تو مخاطب آنی، نه دیگری و خطاب، به سوی توست، نه به سوی دیگری. و اگر شنیدی ،ای کسانی که ایمان آورده اید، پس با گوش جان بشنو، زیرا آن، یا امری است که باید به آن عمل کنی یا خبری است که باید آن را بیاموزی یا اجری است که باید برای آن تلاش کنی. و هنگامی که آن را چنان میفهمی که گو…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @oza99m. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,395,764 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رد بر منکرین فرموده های پیامبر(قرآنیون)” (@oza99m), 79 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oza99m.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.