kiwiwayne - I wonder what this guy really thinks of Ardern I’m a little unsure🤔

Channel
Get to the GAT
@GetToTheGat
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
19subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001573419544 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GetToTheGat |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 2 March 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GetToTheGat |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:30 | 19 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:37 | 19 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 2 March 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 March 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 111
- Videos
- 180
- Links
- 291
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 2h 20m
- Average length
- 20m 01s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Here Are the Names and Faces of WEF’s Young Global Leaders in Australia and New Zealand There are at least 26 World Economic Forum (“WEF”) Young Global Leaders embedded in institutions, charities, and companies in Australia and New Zealand. Here is a list of their names and the institutions or companies that employ them. Not all members and alumni are listed on the Young Global Leaders Community website. The webs…
HAPPENING NOW IN NEW ZEALAND - Without any debate or consultation, they have rushed through (i.e. within 24 hours) amendments to our health act which include the following measures: 1. Declare (without proof or evidence) a dwelling to be unsanitary and in turn order the destruction of the property and the burning of associated materials; 2. Hold us in "quarantine" until such time as we have tested negative to infecti…
https://dreddymd.com/2022/03/07/self-spreading-vaccines-put-society-at-grave/
The Sequel To The Fall Of The Cabal - Part 21 The Untold Truth About Nose Swabs By Janet Ossebaard And Cyntha Koeter Part 21: Covid-19: Part 4 of multiple episodes about the biggest medical scam of all times. About nose swabs and PCR @JustDudeChannel
Photo, posted without a caption
FEMA-CAMPS---Why-People-Will-Go--DARK-OUTPOST-Tavares-2-1-22 https://stopthecrime.net/
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/over-90-percent-covid-deaths-were-jabbed-uks-last-week-reverse-transcribed-into-dna/ Over 90% Of COVID Deaths Were Jabbed In UK's Last Week & Pfizer's mRNA Reverse Transcribed Into DNA Over 90% Of COVID Deaths Were Jabbed In UK's Last Week & Pfizer's mRNA Reverse Transcribed Into DNA https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/over-90-percent-covid-deaths-were-jabbed-uks-last-week-…
Video, posted without a caption
Now, they want to come out and tell that everyone who took the shot is at risk of getting blood clots. This is not informed consent. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/02/everyone-risk-blood-clots-cdc-pfizer-issue-urgent-warnings-blood-clots-even-healthiest-athletes/ https://t.me/News_3Dto5D
5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf
New Zealand cops
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GetToTheGat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@dailyexpose · 28,3973 postsmRNA DEATH TOLL
@mrn_death · 29,6952 postsFormer Lawman
@formerlawman · 21,5541 postJust a Dude 😎
@JustDudeChannel · 64,4971 postMay The Truth Set Us Free
@mttsuf · 1811 postNadia Schwartzmann
@NadiaSchwartzmann · 2371 post3D to 5D Consciousness
@News_3Dto5D · 40,2251 postNZ UNDER ATTACK TELEGRAM
@NZunderAttack · 1061 postThe Crowhouse
@thecrowhouseoffical · 29,8371 postThe Last American Vagabond
@TLAVagabond · 4,5011 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Get to the GAT” (@GetToTheGat), 19 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GetToTheGat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.