https://open.substack.com/pub/petermcculloughmd/p/breaking-fda-confirms-gene-therapy

Channel
💙 AVV 💙 Alliantie voor Vrijheid
@artsenvoorvrijheid
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,852subscribers
-278 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001399429727 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @artsenvoorvrijheid |
| Description | www.artsenvoorvrijheid.be. Plaats vaccinatieschade meldingen hier: @AVVvaccinatieschade Algemene chat kan hier @artsenvoorvrijheidchat |
| Created | 20 April 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/artsenvoorvrijheid |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 02:21 | 6,852 | -11 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 08:38 | 6,863 | -8 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 22:16 | 6,871 | -10 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 03:39 | 6,881 | -1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 19:08 | 6,882 | -11 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 12:00 | 6,893 | -9 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 12:28 | 6,902 | -9 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 18:37 | 6,911 | -17 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 18:07 | 6,928 | -11 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 11:40 | 6,939 | -19 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 12:59 | 6,958 | -21 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 08:20 | 6,979 | -13 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 06:18 | 6,992 | -22 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 7,014 | -16 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 22:41 | 7,030 | -18 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 13:01 | 7,048 | -14 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:55 | 7,062 | -12 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 7,074 | -7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:05 | 7,081 | -4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:28 | 7,085 | first reading |
Engagement
171 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.66%
- avg views ÷ 6,852 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 388
- 72 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.846%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 72
- of 171 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 54 of 72 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 171 (4 August 2026 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 27,941 |
| Reactions total | 178 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 00:08 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈4,210
- Videos
- ≈3,320
- Links
- ≈7,560
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1h 04m
- Average length
- 2m 24s
Measured directly from 27 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
587 reactions across 132 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 161 | 27.4% | |
| 🔥 | 104 | 17.7% | |
| 👍 | 92 | 15.7% | |
| 👏 | 43 | 7.33% | |
| 😢 | 41 | 6.98% | |
| 💯 | 33 | 5.62% | |
| 😱 | 33 | 5.62% | |
| 🙏 | 29 | 4.94% | |
| 🤯 | 22 | 3.75% | |
| 👌 | 8 | 1.36% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 1.36% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 1.19% | |
| 🤔 | 6 | 1.02% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 135 of the 171 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 587 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 171 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 72 posts held from the last 30 days (2.78%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
In de 124e aflevering van De Andere Tafel ontvangt presentator Sander Compagner, Statenlid van de provincie Gelderland Marcel Roerdink en journalist van De Andere krant Bert Weteringe. Roerdink schreef het boek De stille staatsgreep in het huis van Thorbecke waar Weteringe een artikel over schreef. Tijdens zijn werk voor de Provinciale Staten bemerkte Roerdink dat zaken buiten de democratie en zonder de juiste proced…
Julian Reichelt, jarenlang hoofdredacteur van de grootste krant van Duitsland, onthult hoe politici die strenge coronaregels opstelden zich er zelf niet aan hielden. Bij hem thuis kwamen ze samen met tien tot twaalf man, zonder mondkapje of afstand. Hij belooft er een boek over te schrijven. Politieke elite lapte coronaregels aan haar laars: ‘Niemand geloofde erin’
👏6🔥1
In the controversial documentary BENEATH THE SURFACE, Ickonic Media in collaboration with Hartenvrouw Productions shed light on a topic few people are willing to address: mind control and organised child abuse. The film features experts: ✹ David Icke: Author and Investigative researcher ✹ Ella Ster: Investigative Researcher ✹ Gideon van Meijeren: Member House of Representatives ✹ Steve van Herreweghe: Trauma Expert …
🤯1
https://robindeboer.substack.com/p/40-procent-hogere-sterfte-de-ongemakkelijke
https://open.substack.com/pub/unbekoming/p/vaccination-100-years-of-orthodox
❤3
https://petities.nl/petities/garandeer-het-recht-op-een-leven-zonder-een-digitale-identiteit
De Tweede Kamer gaat debatteren over een nieuw mensenrecht: het recht om te leven zonder digitale identiteit. Achter de schermen groeit het verzet tegen de EDI-Wallet, terwijl de overheid volhoudt dat gebruik vrijwillig blijft. Maar wat betekent vrijwillig als banken en zorgverzekeraars straks weigeren je zonder te helpen? Burgerverzet bereikt Den Haag: recht op leven zonder digitale identiteit op politieke agenda
👏8
https://geziningevaar.nl/artikelen/christelijke-arts-krijgt-boete-wilde-geen-puberteitsblokkers-aan-trans-tiener-geven
🔥2
September Nieuwsbrief Safeblood Er wordt een nieuwe testronde gedaan voor het middel Genetic Rewind voor herstel van het DNA na mRNA vaccinatie. Leden en geabonneerden op de nieuwsbrief van Safeblood konden zich hiervoor aanmelden als testpersoon. Binnen 4 dagen was de testgroep vol. Meer informatie is te vinden in de nieuwsbrief.
❤1🔥1
We had this video (which can also be found in the newsletter) generated by AI. It offers a very good summary of the situation regarding targeted blood donations, but certain statements should be taken with a grain of salt, because for AI controlled by the mainstream, organizations like SafeBlood are, of course, conspiracy theorists—even though the over 100 studies cited on our website prove that, unfortunately, our w…
Bloeddonaties: waar gaat je gedoneerde bloed heen? Een artikel over waar bloeddonaties zoal heen gaan. Het gaat niet alleen naar het helpen van mensen die bloed nodig hebben. Het belandt ook bij de farmaceutische industrie die het gebruikt voor het maken van medicijnen en voor onderzoek. En een deel gaat naar de cosmetische industrie. Dit artikel legt het uit en geeft de cijfers. https://safeblood.substack.com/p/bl…
Showing the 12 most recent of 171 posts we hold for @artsenvoorvrijheid. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@helpcovidvaccinslachtoffers · 315 postsKANAAL - GEEN prikbussen op school!
@KANAALGEENprikbussenopschool · 5112 postsViruswaanzin/Vrijheid vzw
@viruswaanzinbelgie · 1772 posts💛 AVV Vaccinatieschade 💛 Alliantie voor Vrijheid
@AVVvaccinatieschade · 6,4151 postWWG1WGA TOTAAL 🇳🇱🇺🇲🇷🇺
@WWG1WGATOTAAL · 6,8121 postLiefde ❤️ vrijheid & waarheid! Nieuwskanaal
@eenheidvoordevrijheid · 3,3011 postGUDU
@gudusososlobi · 401 postWare Kracht Ilona
@warekracht · 16,2041 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@ninefornews · 17,05332 postsFallCabal Official Channel
@Fall_of_the_Cabal · 81,10719 postsDe Andere Krant
@deanderekrant · 3,9896 postsDr Mike Yeadon solo channel
@DrMikeYeadonsolochannel · 25,9125 postsDésirée L. Röver
@desiree_rover · 1,4704 postsSergeant News Network 🇺🇸
@SGTnewsNetwork · 109,6213 postsVRIJ DRENTHE - Kanaal ♥️☘️🌳
@VRIJDRENTHEKANAAL · 1,2313 postsWij Zijn De Vrijheid🇳🇱
@WijZijnDeVrijheid · 1,5493 postsCultuur onder Vuur
@cultuurondervuur · 3,1963 postsQanon belgium
@qanonbelgium · 4,1193 postsNieuwRechts.nl
@NieuwRechts · 2,7702 postsDaniël The HealthMan
@danielthehealthman · 15,3892 postsGerard Le Noble
@ditishetnieuws · 12,0092 posts🚫 Plandemic 🚫
@CoVaNews · 5,8471 postDr. Tenpenny
@DrTenpenny · 87,5541 postEva Herman Offiziell
@EvaHermanOffiziell · 187,9721 postFrontnieuwsCom
@FrontnieuwsCom · 10,5041 postGeoengineering-Chemtrails-H.A.A.R.P & het Klimaat🔅
@GeoChem · 6,5291 postGermanische Heilkunde NL 🇳🇱 🇧🇪
@GermanischeNL · 2,1541 postLifeCoachKatrien
@LifeCoachKatrien · 11 postMajFreddy’s Channel
@MajorFreddysChannel · 19,0851 postOMLIN News
@OmlinNews · 1751 postTruthAboutCOVID
@TruthAboutCOVID · 7,8831 postWWG1WGA TOTAAL 🇳🇱🇺🇲🇷🇺
@WWG1WGATOTAAL · 6,8121 postArtsen Collectief
@artsencollectief · 19,7011 postClovis & Mary
@clovismary · 3,1771 postRomy Quint
@mymiddleroad · 7721 postDr Peter McCullough™ Channel
@realpetermcculloughmd · 1,1921 postRoberto Coppens kanaal. Informatie, ontmaskering & bewustzijn community. INFORMATIEF
@robertocoppens · 2,1341 postRobin Monotti
@robinmg · 66,9171 postSafeBlood English
@safeblood_en · 7,3101 post5G schadelijk
@schadlijkheid_5G_en_straling · 191 postStop World Control
@swcbenelux · 10,0731 postThe Yorkshire Lass
@theyorkshirelassnews · 28,0291 postVrouwen Voor Vrijheid
@vrouwenvoorvrijheid · 5,7461 postDe Andere Kijk
@wiekentdewaarheid · 2,9201 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@ditishetnieuws · 12,0093 postsSergeant News Network 🇺🇸
@SGTnewsNetwork · 109,6213 postsCLO2_NL CDS/MMS Ervaringen/Testimonials
@clo2_nl_cds_cdl_mms_ervaring · 1,7711 postClovis & Mary
@clovismary · 3,1771 post🚫 Plandemic 🚫
@CoVaNews · 5,8471 postDr Mike Yeadon solo channel
@DrMikeYeadonsolochannel · 25,9121 postEva Herman Offiziell
@EvaHermanOffiziell · 187,9721 postFOXNEWS
@foxnews · 14,9151 postGeoengineering-Chemtrails-H.A.A.R.P & het Klimaat🔅
@GeoChem · 6,5291 postAyatollah Khamenei
@GovRonDeSantis · 591 postKOPP Report
@koppreport · 22,0071 postRoberto Coppens kanaal. Informatie, ontmaskering & bewustzijn community. INFORMATIEF
@robertocoppens · 2,1341 postRobin Monotti
@robinmg · 66,9171 postThe Universal Antidote Videos
@theuniversalantidote · 85,2391 postTruthAboutCOVID
@TruthAboutCOVID · 7,8831 postThe Washington Post
@washingtonpost · 56,9261 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@artsenvoorvrijheid named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@artsencollectief · 19,701
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 29 September 2026
@klokkenluiders · 38,442
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💙 AVV 💙 Alliantie voor Vrijheid” (@artsenvoorvrijheid), 6,852 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artsenvoorvrijheid.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.