Channel
@Secret_history1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
71,524subscribers
-835 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001698069654 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Secret_history1 |
| Description | You won't see anything like this anywhere else Link for friends - https://t.me/+QzEd1Wu4IPI3Y2M0 NEW: https://t.me/Oleg_Akerman2 @Oleg_Akerman https://telega.io/c/secret_history1 |
| Created | 24 November 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Secret_history1 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 11:41 | 71,524 | -170 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 21:58 | 71,694 | -39 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:36 | 71,733 | -40 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:15 | 71,773 | -15 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 71,788 | -44 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:40 | 71,832 | -62 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:00 | 71,894 | -63 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 04:56 | 71,957 | -43 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:57 | 72,000 | -17 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:48 | 72,017 | -31 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:14 | 72,048 | -36 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 72,084 | -28 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:35 | 72,112 | -30 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 72,142 | -16 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 72,158 | -8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 72,166 | -21 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:38 | 72,187 | -31 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 72,218 | -29 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 04:38 | 72,247 | -9 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:44 | 72,256 | first reading |
429 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 117 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 429 (3 August 2026 – 3 October 2026) |
| Views total | 399,250 |
| Reactions total | 3,087 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Oct 2026, 03:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 373 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7,955 reactions across 428 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 2,113 | 26.6% | |
| ❤ | 1,473 | 18.5% | |
| 👍 | 1,305 | 16.4% | |
| 😱 | 695 | 8.74% | |
| 🔥 | 499 | 6.27% | |
| 🤯 | 420 | 5.28% | |
| 🤔 | 326 | 4.10% | |
| 🙏 | 250 | 3.14% | |
| ⚡ | 245 | 3.08% | |
| 👌 | 245 | 3.08% | |
| 👏 | 234 | 2.94% | |
| 🥰 | 42 | 0.528% | |
| 🐳 | 40 | 0.503% | |
| 🤩 | 31 | 0.39% | |
| ❤🔥 | 19 | 0.239% | |
| 🕊 | 18 | 0.226% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 429 of the 429 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,955 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 429 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Secret_history1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 429 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 3 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Is this proof of God and religion in genetics? Or did some religions just pulled this out of what they knew about anatomy? How would they have known this back when the cross was created? Very interesting and intriguing… Laminin Subscribe and share >> S E E | Secret History I found a hidden channel: "Banned Truth" check it out before it disappears!
❤6
According to the doctrine, police currently are corporate not constitutional. Apparently this means that they can be arrested for impersonating a constitutional officer. I wouldn’t try to enforce this until you fully fully fully understand everything surrounding this… Subscribe and share >> S E E | Secret History Recommended Channels: Click here
💯7❤5
They are killing the bees and the bees that are poisoned are killing the wildlife. This is happening in Australia where the worst things in the world are currently happening due to the government being completely insane… That being said this is an example of the things that are to come and the rest of our countries.. This may be a long video but it’s worth the watch see what it does to wild life. This is sick and …
💯9😱6❤2
📌 𝗥𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗻𝗼𝘄, 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗺𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗵 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗯𝗲 𝗮𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝟮𝟬 𝘁𝗼 𝟯𝟮 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀 𝗳𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝗶𝘁 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗯𝗲. This explains why your gums are receding and your teeth are loosening… 🦷 Why cavities keep forming despite doing "everything right"… And why that bad breath won't go away. 💨 The problem isn't your diet or your hygiene — 𝗶𝘁’𝘀 𝗮 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰 𝗲𝗻𝘇𝘆𝗺𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗴𝗶𝘃𝗲𝘀 𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗺𝗳𝘂𝗹 𝗯𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗮 𝗶𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗺𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗵 𝗮𝗻 𝗶𝗻𝘃𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗯𝗹𝗲 "𝗮𝗿𝗺𝗼𝗿"... 🛡 Making them practically…
❤2
California underground residences? This lady stumbles a crossed a billboard ad in an open space apparently suggesting that you can live underground in a silo in California… It turns out it’s just another creative way to program the masses… Predictive programming Subscribe and share >> S E E | Secret History I found a hidden channel: "Banned Truth" check it out before it disappears!
❤2🔥2🤩2
Trying to have a relationship when you’re awake to everything going on is exactly like this…. You honestly just want to fill them in on everything you know so you can be on the same page so they won’t think you’re a weirdo… We are in crazy times right now… What a crazy divide there is between the knowers and the know nots… Vegas shooting Subscribe and share >> S E E | Secret History Recommended Channels: Click h…
❤7👍3
💥 Canadian firefighters speaking out when they offered to put out the fire Canadian government went on TV and said that they needed help and no one was around…. This was planned and they are liars and it literally was an attack on the United States and should be treated that way…. The United States and Canadian government are clearly working together to attack the people… Subscribe and share >> S E E | Secret Hist…
❤4👍1
Here’s a video of an Arab individual who is saying that the world is flat and that there are rivers of petrol under the earth.. Apparently crude oil flows freely in rivers throughout the earth… Apparently there’s a huge gate that leads to other civilizations on earth… Who knows how credible this is who knows how to verify it. Interesting to say the least Subscribe and share >> S E E | Secret History Recommended …
💯13❤4🐳1
🦷 Two dental X-rays revealed a difference nobody expected… 😳 Both patients were 45 years old. Both brushed their teeth every day. Yet their X-rays looked completely different. 🇺🇸 One was from an American man struggling with years of dental problems. 🇸🇪 The other was from a Scandinavian man of the same age. So what was different? It may have less to do with brushing harder — and more to do with what is happenin…
❤1
BOMBSHELL! Mel Gibson about to EXPOSE all of them | Redacted with Natali and Clayton Morris If Mel Gibson releases this documentary they’ll probably kill him… Subscribe and share >> S E E | Secret History Recommended Channels: Click here
🔥9💯2❤1
Do you wonder why breathing is such an important aspect to all ancient practices? Why do you feel different when you breathe different? Why does breathing help you calm down? Breathing is the key to much more than we know and I think you should calm down take a second and breathe and just allow the more oxygen into your brain… It triggers very important things in our body and mind… One of the most important step…
👏9👌3❤2
This elite whistleblower blew the whistle during a shareholders meeting…. Told Bill Gates right to his face that he was a pedophile working with Jeffrey Epstein. They then arrested him and escorted him out of the building and charged him with trespassing….. I hope more people like this exist in the world Subscribe and share >> S E E | Secret History I found a hidden channel: "Banned Truth" check it out before it …
❤12👏6👍4🤯3👌2
Showing the 12 most recent of 429 posts we hold for @Secret_history1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@Secret_history1 edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 39 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 30 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“S E E | Secret History” (@Secret_history1), 71,524 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Secret_history1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.