Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Artsen Collectief

Channel

Artsen Collectief

@artsencollectief

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

20,242subscribers

-89 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001564295771
TypeChannel
Username@artsencollectief
DescriptionWij zijn een collectief van artsen en medisch professionals dat in gesprek wil gaan over het coronabeleid. Zie onze website artsencollectief.nl voor onze missie en kernpunten. Het Artsen Collectief is niet verantwoordelijk voor de reacties.
Created28 June 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/artsencollectief

Growth

20,24220,33120,286.56 August 2026 — 20,331 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,331 subscribers7 August 2026 — 20,320 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,312 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,300 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,292 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,283 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,272 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,261 subscribers15 August 2026 — 20,247 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,242 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 11 days, net -89. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,229–20,344 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 11:2620,242-5
15 Aug 2026, 19:4320,247-14
14 Aug 2026, 07:4620,261-11
12 Aug 2026, 21:5720,272-11
11 Aug 2026, 19:1620,283-9
10 Aug 2026, 17:3720,292-8
9 Aug 2026, 17:5220,300-12
8 Aug 2026, 15:4120,312-8
7 Aug 2026, 15:1120,320-11
6 Aug 2026, 09:5120,331no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:4220,331first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 19 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.0%
avg views ÷ 20,242 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,880
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held21 (19 June 202614 August 2026)
Views total27,520
Reactions total309
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 03:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
782
Videos
174
Links
1,410

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5m 27s
Average length
1m 49s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,157 reactions across 21 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,41765.7%
👍46721.7%
🔥1436.63%
👏783.62%
🤔341.58%
😢90.417%
🙏40.185%
😱20.093%
🥰20.093%
🤯10.046%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,157reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 20:52 UTC≈4,720 views98 reactionsread 18 August 2026

“We hebben er gratis nieuwe ziektebeelden bijgekregen” Frank van de Goot, klinisch en forensisch patholoog, is duidelijk naar journalist en presentator Pieter van der Wielen van de NRC-interviewserie ‘Het uur’. In het onderdeel Veranderen doodsoorzaken door de tijd heen? noemt Van de Goot auto-immuungerelateerde afwijkingen als het gevolg van coronavaccinaties. Hij is voorzichtig het een toename te noemen, “we kijken

68👍25🔥5

5 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTC≈6,290 views59 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Anthony Fauci: een genuanceerd oordeel Anthony Fauci, voormalig directeur van het NIAID en adviseur van zowel president Trump als president Biden tijdens de coronapandemie, is opnieuw onderwerp van debat. Zijn vrijgegeven dagboeken en zijn beroep op het zwijgrecht tijdens een recente hoorzitting zorgen voor veel discussie. In deze analyse van een Amerikaanse hematoloog/oncoloog en voormalig FDA‑directeur wordt uitg

👍3713🔥9

3 Aug 2026, 19:08 UTC≈6,510 views53 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Een bijzondere aflevering van HEEL GEZOND met Alexander Tan Alexander Tan vertelt openhartig over hoe emoties, stress en levensverhalen invloed hebben op ons lichaam. Samen met dr. Felix van der Wissel verkent hij de eeuwenoude én wetenschappelijke inzichten die laten zien hoe geest en lichaam samenwerken. Een inspirerend gesprek met praktische tips en een nieuwe kijk op heling. 👉 Bekijk hier: https://www.lighthous

38👍15

22 Jul 2026, 09:38 UTC≈10,000 views99 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Nieuw artikel: Het Lancetonderzoek over mRNA‑vaccins - waarom het verhaal niet compleet is In juni 2026 verscheen een grote overzichtsstudie in The Lancet over de veiligheid van mRNA‑vaccins. Veel media presenteerden deze publicatie als sluitend bewijs dat de technologie volledig veilig is. In dit artikel leggen we uit waarom dat beeld te simpel is. Verschillende wetenschappers plaatsen namelijk kritische kantteken

👍6123🔥15

17 Jul 2026, 07:01 UTC≈10,200 views60 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

NIEUWE DATUM: Bergen op Zoom – 27 september De Stilte Schreeuwt blijft volle zalen trekken in bioscopen door heel Nederland. Heb jij hem al gezien? Op 27 september organiseren we een nieuwe bijeenkomst van De Stilte Schreeuwt in Bergen op Zoom. Een middag vol herkenning, verdieping en verbinding voor iedereen die te maken heeft met langdurige klachten na vaccinatie of infectie. De Stilte Schreeuwt blijft mensen ra

44👏12👍2🔥2

14 Jul 2026, 07:24 UTC≈8,490 views200 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Academische vrijheid staat onder druk — en blijft essentieel Jona Walk schreef een scherpe analyse over een belangrijke uitspraak van de Commissie Wetenschappelijke Integriteit van de Radboud Universiteit. Centraal staat de vraag of een wetenschapper ter verantwoording mag worden geroepen omdat zij een minderheidsstandpunt inneemt. De universiteit stelt duidelijk van niet: integriteitsprocedures zijn er voor echte s

101👍85👏14

13 Jul 2026, 06:47 UTC≈6,330 views279 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video

Bij herhaling: onze reactie op de uitspraken van Hugo de Jonge In het filmpje waarin Hugo de Jonge spreekt over “een klein groepje artsen”, vergeten we één detail: dat “groepje” bestaat inmiddels uit honderden artsen, verloskundigen, verpleegkundigen en andere zorgprofessionals. En miljoenen mensen lazen onze informatie. Met medical common sense. Met oog voor #firstdonoharm. Het Artsen Collectief blijft staan voor

231👏34🔥13🥰1

11 Jul 2026, 07:57 UTC≈8,300 views305 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Artsen Collectief reageert op uitspraken van Hugo de Jonge Laten we voormalig minister De Jonge op één punt gelijk geven: het Artsen Collectief heeft via social media inderdaad “een stevig podium weten te verkrijgen”. Dank aan jullie: onze volgers, onze achterban. Het Artsen Collectief is dankbaar voor iedereen die door onze informatie vanuit de bij ons aangesloten artsen, verloskundigen, verpleegkundigen en vele an

264👍23🔥12👏5🥰1

10 Jul 2026, 19:59 UTC≈6,200 views76 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Desinformatiecircus! Weet Hugo de Jonge niet wat “onder ede” betekent? Nu bij Dwarsnieuws - te gast Jona Walk: https://dwarsnieuws.nl/desinformatiecircus-weet-hugo-de-jonge-niet-wat-onder-ede-betekent-dddc-19/ Eindelijk moest Hugo de Jonge vandaag onder ede verantwoording afleggen voor zijn rol in de coronacrisis. Marianne Zwagerman en Maurice de Hond zoeken naar woorden om hun verbijstering over te brengen.

63🔥8👍4🤯1

10 Jul 2026, 12:54 UTC≈5,990 views47 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

NIEUW: Bergen op Zoom – 27 september De Stilte Schreeuwt blijft volle zalen trekken in bioscopen door heel Nederland. Heb jij hem al gezien? Op 27 september organiseren we een nieuwe bijeenkomst van De Stilte Schreeuwt in Bergen op Zoom. Een middag vol herkenning, verdieping en verbinding voor iedereen die te maken heeft met langdurige klachten na vaccinatie of infectie. De Stilte Schreeuwt blijft mensen raken en

33👍12🔥2

8 Jul 2026, 08:52 UTC≈6,110 views81 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Filmvoorstellingen De Stilte Schreeuwt voor de zomer uitverkocht De filmtournee van De Stilte Schreeuwt zit in het zomerreces. De afgelopen maanden trok de documentaire van Frank de Rooij door heel Nederland, precies in een periode waarin covid en vaccinatieschade volop in de aandacht staan door de Parlementaire Enquête Corona. Na de uitverkochte première volgden twaalf volle zalen in o.a. Zutphen, Joure, Rosmalen,

81

8 Jul 2026, 08:12 UTC≈5,510 views56 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Steun huisarts Berber Pieksma in haar inzet voor kinderen die bescherming nodig hebben. Onlangs verwierp het Centraal Tuchtcollege haar hoger beroep: volgens de tuchtrechter mag een huisarts geen ondersteunende verklaring schrijven voor een misbruikt kind zonder toestemming van de beschuldigde ouder. Deze uitspraak staat haaks op internationale kinderrechten, waaronder de Istanbul‑conventie en artikel 3 van het Inte

45👍10🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @artsencollectief. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 409,817 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Artsen Collectief” (@artsencollectief), 20,242 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artsencollectief.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.