Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ariel

Channel

Ariel

@prolotario1channel

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

14,105subscribers

+1,247 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001834655502
TypeChannel
Username@prolotario1channel
DescriptionFacts & Conspiracy | Non-(Pay) triot || N.O. B & R | Pro Gun-Pro Money | Infotainment | My 2 Cents | Red Line Intel/Info | Simon Says Follow Me
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/prolotario1channel

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

13,400 average views per post against 14,087 subscribers — an engagement rate of 94.8%. Across the 6,391 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,001–31,617 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 2.54% and 14.4%, with a median of 6.81%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured25 of 25 published in the window (0 exact, 25 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled333,770
Mature posts only97.4% over 22 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers14,087 measured 4 November 2026
Cohortb10000:eng · 6,391 channels · p10 0.671% · p25 2.54% · p50 6.81% · p75 14.4% · p90 25.3%
Position in cohort99.593th percentile · 13.9× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.207% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageEnglish · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

12,85814,10513,481.57 August 2026 — 12,858 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,858 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,913 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,932 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,960 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,982 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,004 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,006 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,030 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,022 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,017 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,055 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,066 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,076 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,085 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,095 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,097 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,093 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,108 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,122 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,152 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,158 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,195 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,203 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,236 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,246 subscribers8 September 2026 — 13,250 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,248 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,250 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,278 subscribers16 September 2026 — 13,302 subscribers19 September 2026 — 13,377 subscribers25 September 2026 — 13,570 subscribers4 October 2026 — 13,702 subscribers8 October 2026 — 13,761 subscribers13 October 2026 — 13,822 subscribers14 October 2026 — 13,852 subscribers15 October 2026 — 13,867 subscribers16 October 2026 — 13,885 subscribers17 October 2026 — 13,911 subscribers18 October 2026 — 13,923 subscribers19 October 2026 — 13,930 subscribers20 October 2026 — 13,931 subscribers21 October 2026 — 13,952 subscribers22 October 2026 — 13,966 subscribers24 October 2026 — 13,976 subscribers25 October 2026 — 13,980 subscribers25 October 2026 — 13,978 subscribers26 October 2026 — 13,988 subscribers27 October 2026 — 14,001 subscribers28 October 2026 — 14,015 subscribers29 October 2026 — 14,031 subscribers30 October 2026 — 14,033 subscribers31 October 2026 — 14,036 subscribers1 November 2026 — 14,032 subscribers2 November 2026 — 14,071 subscribers3 November 2026 — 14,080 subscribers4 November 2026 — 14,087 subscribers5 November 2026 — 14,104 subscribers6 November 2026 — 14,105 subscribers7 August 20266 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 92 days, net +1,247. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,671–14,292 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 17:2614,105+1
5 Nov 2026, 20:3614,104+17
4 Nov 2026, 22:1714,087+7
3 Nov 2026, 23:5614,080+9
2 Nov 2026, 20:4514,071+39
1 Nov 2026, 23:2914,032-4
31 Oct 2026, 20:4814,036+3
30 Oct 2026, 22:2814,033+2
29 Oct 2026, 21:5614,031+16
28 Oct 2026, 21:5914,015+14
27 Oct 2026, 23:0414,001+13
26 Oct 2026, 21:4713,988+10
25 Oct 2026, 22:3013,978-2
25 Oct 2026, 00:0413,980+4
24 Oct 2026, 01:1113,976+10
22 Oct 2026, 22:2813,966+14
21 Oct 2026, 16:4013,952+21
20 Oct 2026, 11:3813,931+1
19 Oct 2026, 13:3413,930+7
18 Oct 2026, 13:1613,923first reading

Engagement

101 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
93.4%
avg views ÷ 14,105 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,200
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 101 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held101 (28 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total408,240
Reactions total8,198
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 18:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈736
Videos
≈357
Links
≈1,430

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
10m 50s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

27,091 reactions across 101 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5,56220.5%
👍5,09818.8%
🔥4,27515.8%
💯3,63813.4%
🙏2,76310.2%
🤣1,4025.18%
🤬1,3464.97%
👏1,1554.26%
👀4381.62%
⚡2851.05%
🤔2620.967%
🤯1970.727%
🫡1420.524%
👌1170.432%
🎉1000.369%
😢910.336%
🕊780.288%
🤨540.199%
❤‍🔥310.114%
🤩220.081%
3 further kinds350.129%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 101 of the 101 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27,091 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 101 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
116
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 101 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @prolotario1channel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 101 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 31 posts held from the last 30 days (6.45%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 15:21 UTC≈2,410 views156 reactionsread 7 November 2026

From A Friend 😎 Stephen Miller doesn't walk into rooms. He changes their atmospheric pressure. When the news hit the wire at 14:07 EST Wiles out, Miller in you could feel the oxygen get sucked out of every Democratic strategy session from the DNC's K Street war room to Schumer's Capitol hideaway. Not because Miller is some master strategist. Because Miller is the one man in American politics who treats mercy like …

🔥99👍25🙏10❤‍🔥9💯6❤3🤔3⚡1

6 Nov 2026, 23:44 UTC≈15,100 views268 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026
Photo

As The World Turns And The Midnight Oil Burns: The Mission Statement Is Written The Political War Is Over 🏴‍☠️ Stephen Miller walks through the West Wing at 5:00 PM. What Is Expected To Happen? Susie Wiles, the woman who held Trump’s political operation together, is gone. Many will not miss her. IN: Stephen Miller. Not a strategist. Not a manager. Not a translator. A doctrinal architect with the chain locks of…

🔥140👏57❤36👍12🫡6👀5🤣5🙏4

6 Nov 2026, 16:09 UTC≈6,810 views300 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

8+9=17 Follow 👉🏻 Ariel

👍143🔥71🎉46❤13👏7🤨5🙏5🤩4

6 Nov 2026, 02:40 UTC≈4,530 views230 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Microsoft... Word? See what I did there? 🤭 Follow 👉🏻 Ariel

🤣129🤬56🔥19👀7🤔7🙏7❤2👏2

5 Nov 2026, 23:27 UTC≈16,800 views275 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

"Give me control of a nation's money supply, and I care not who makes its laws" ~Mayer Amschel Rothschild Why is the quote important? Congress makes laws. Treasury and the Fed make reality. And that distinction is about to become the only thing that matters. Congress can pass a thousand laws. If the currency those laws operate on gets repriced against gold, every law passed under the old monetary regime becomes e…

🔥135❤65🙏37💯13👍12🫡5👌3🎉2

5 Nov 2026, 15:45 UTC≈7,220 views285 reactionsread 7 November 2026

What Democrats Have To Do To Regain Power? Stop the currency reset. Stop the tokenization. Stop the AI/Automation/Robots. Stop the election fraud investigation. Stop Elon Musk takeover. Stop the attacks on Iran. Block the quantum financial shift. Halt gold standard revival. Prevent full transparency rollout. Quash the decentralization surge. Neutralize the Governor autonomy wave. Shut down the asset-backe…

❤135💯57👍35🔥29🙏23🤬2⚡1👏1

5 Nov 2026, 00:31 UTC≈7,190 views256 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

This Is One Thing People Are Overlooking Under the current legal framework, the President retains control over federal agencies, treaty enforcement, military deployment, and foreign policy. The Governors control election certification, National Guard deployment, state-level emergency powers, and critically the certification of electors for the next presidential election. Donald Trump told us in his 1st term that…

❤110🔥71🙏33👍21👏11🤔10

4 Nov 2026, 20:05 UTC≈18,000 views261 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Since 1946, the president's party has lost House seats in 18 out of 20 midterm elections. What Happened Yesterday Continues That Trend But in the face of cheating we understand that continuity could have been broken. But there is a reason why POTUS didn't put his name on the ballot. Why would he need to if he knows he has these 3 Aces in his pocket? Harmeet Dhillon Russ Vought Jay Clayton Why do you think the …

❤138👍57🔥31💯12🤣6🤔5⚡4🫡4

4 Nov 2026, 14:41 UTC≈19,700 views277 reactionsread 7 November 2026

They Are Already Purging Themselves Multiple reports (Bloomberg, NPR, others) confirm roughly 300 of the ~400 attorneys left the DOJ Civil Rights Division after Harmeet Dhillon took over in 2025 and redirected it toward voter-roll integrity lawsuits and away from prior DEI priorities. She has publicly called it a self-purge. The division is actively pursuing those voter-roll cases with new staff. Jay Claton Is Abo…

❤129👍58🔥41🙏32👏6💯6🤣3⚡2

4 Nov 2026, 02:26 UTC≈6,890 views304 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

PRESIDENT TRUMP’S URGENT ELECTION NIGHT MESSAGE 🇺🇸 “If you’re in line, STAY IN LINE!” 🔥 VOTE RED 🔴 🇺🇸 Follow 👉🏻 Ariel

💯191❤46👍24🔥13🙏13🤣8🤬6👌2

3 Nov 2026, 18:20 UTC≈23,000 views180 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

The Clock Is Winding Down On The Regime: Every revaluation in history the deutsche mark 1948, the ruble 1998, the Argentine convertibility plan, the Vietnamese dong had one thing in common. The fiscal authority had to stop creating a second, competing exchange rate. Budgets don’t move the rate. Budgets determine whether the rate can be unified. This isn’t a spending vote. It’s a rate-numerator vote. Iraq’s proble…

👍98🔥27❤25🙏21👏7💯1🫡1

3 Nov 2026, 01:14 UTC≈8,040 views400 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

They Identified Their Loved Ones In A Joint Statement They came together at the end like it's the outro to "The Mickey Mouse Club" "Did they identify them via Ouija board? Did the spirits of the deceased tap out a message on a planchette, which the families then typed into a Microsoft Word document?" So supposedly the jet "disintegrated" at 360 MPH nose-first. That means the aircraft was pulp. It means the human b…

👍169💯146❤42🤣17🔥11🙏7👏4⚡3

Showing the 12 most recent of 101 posts we hold for @prolotario1channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @prolotario1channel as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
4 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
4 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
12 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 31 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ariel” (@prolotario1channel), 14,105 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prolotario1channel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.