This month's Microsoft "patch tuesday" is supposed to fix 400 flaws and vunerabilities in Windows. 😳 Yes, you read that number correctly. Four hundred. Still feel like your files, passwords, etc. are "safe" in Windows? How many flaws and vunerabilities will be in next month's "patch Tuesday?" Even stranger is how they act like it's just "normal." 🤷♂️ https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/microsoft/microsoft-aug…

Channel
Jeffrey Peterson - jeff.pro
@jeffdotpro
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
24,543subscribers
-86 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001299478212 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jeffdotpro |
| Description | A lifetime in technology and business. Former founder, CEO QP/MeetMe .com, a top-20 Social Network in U.S. History, 100MM+ users, traded on the Nasdaq Stock Market for 20 years (QPSA, MEET), sold to eHarmony by acquisition on 3/2020. jeff.pro |
| Created | 29 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jeffdotpro |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:23 | 24,543 | -7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 24,550 | -24 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 24,574 | -12 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:11 | 24,586 | -15 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:12 | 24,601 | -26 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:12 | 24,627 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:00 | 24,629 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:59 | 24,629 | first reading |
Engagement
43 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.36%
- avg views ÷ 24,543 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,810
- 42 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.79%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 43
- of 43 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 41 of 42 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 43 (1 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 75,839 |
| Reactions total | 2,869 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 22:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈4,740
- Videos
- ≈585
- Links
- ≈4,110
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 4m 06s
- Average length
- 1m 02s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,869 reactions across 41 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 744 | 25.9% | |
| ❤ | 583 | 20.3% | |
| 💯 | 569 | 19.8% | |
| 👏 | 213 | 7.42% | |
| 🙏 | 157 | 5.47% | |
| 🔥 | 146 | 5.09% | |
| 👀 | 105 | 3.66% | |
| 🎉 | 78 | 2.72% | |
| 😁 | 52 | 1.81% | |
| 🤮 | 48 | 1.67% | |
| 👎 | 45 | 1.57% | |
| 🥰 | 42 | 1.46% | |
| 🖕 | 31 | 1.08% | |
| 🏆 | 21 | 0.732% | |
| 🤩 | 13 | 0.453% | |
| 💩 | 8 | 0.279% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 0.139% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 0.139% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 0.139% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.035% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.035% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,869reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://jeff.pro/hackers-talk-their-way-into-levis-corporate-data
🔥20👀17😱4👍1🤡1
Want privacy news without the noise? MARK37.COM keeps you informed on Ghost Phones, secure tech, and the tools that put you back in control. Follow us and join a growing community that values digital freedom. Gab: https://gab.com/mark37_com Odysee: https://odysee.com/@mark37.com Rumble: https://rumble.com/mark37 Telegram: https://t.me/MARK37public Truth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@mark37 X: https://x.com/MARK37…
👍27❤4
Many thoughts about this video. Seems to me, she should have been able to jump in and hit the brakes. 🤷♂️
😁52👀21💯11👍10🤣4❤2
Hopefully you've been enjoying the new Jeff.pro website. It was launched a few months ago. It's been working great - it has a built-in "Learning Management System" (LMS) for our courses, among other things, and allows us to publish better news articles during the week. And yes, the new jeff.pro site is completely new - the result of years of work. HOWEVER - this weekend, there was a bug. The new site emailed a bunc…
👍30❤22
Learn a little about how to take back control of your technology, one day at a time, by making this channel a part of your daily reading list here on Telegram. @jeffdotpro
👍21❤4
SCRIPTURE 11 Not that I speak in regard to need, for I have learned in whatever state I am, to be content: 12 I know how to be abased, and I know how to abound. Everywhere and in all things I have learned both to be full and to be hungry, both to abound and to suffer need. 13 I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me. 19 And my God shall supply all your need according to His riches in glory by Christ …
🙏63💯23❤20👍1
Pianist / composer Vince Guaraldi, enjoy! Have a great weekend frens! 🥳🇺🇸
❤82👍6
Anyone curious, or already in the group, is welcome to join us for today's Remove Data 2026 video live stream @ 3:00pm EDT / 12:00 noon Pacific. Link: https://jeff.pro/watch/remove-data-2026-aug08
❤10👍9
for me, "Back to School" 🤣 How bout you frens? 🤔
❤42👍3
🤔
💯39❤23👍14🤩1
🥸
💯26👍11❤10🙏7🤩2
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @jeffdotpro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 424,444 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@socalmitch · 3273 postsAmerican UP
@AmericanUP · 241 postFreedom and Truth 🇺🇸 Justice is coming
@FreedomAndTruth · 2501 postInfinity Labs
@infinitylabs_eu · 261 postMicaela Del Rosario
@micaeladelrosario · 591 post17 Red Pill Farmacy
@RPFarm · 391 postSelfLiberationFromTechTyranny
@SelfLiberateFromTechTyranny · 211 post🐸 Military veterans The FROGS OF WAR 😆
@Uk_patriotalliance · 2221 postWe Know the Ending
@weknowtheending · 151 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@JamesOKeefeIII · 171,140
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Jeffrey Peterson - jeff.pro” (@jeffdotpro), 24,543 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jeffdotpro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.