Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 96 days, net -3,781. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 85,673–90,588 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 22:11
86,240
-54
8 Nov 2026, 14:45
86,294
-48
7 Nov 2026, 09:16
86,342
-41
6 Nov 2026, 12:18
86,383
-55
5 Nov 2026, 09:36
86,438
-46
4 Nov 2026, 08:36
86,484
-41
3 Nov 2026, 06:01
86,525
-34
2 Nov 2026, 02:20
86,559
-29
1 Nov 2026, 03:28
86,588
-33
31 Oct 2026, 02:38
86,621
-41
29 Oct 2026, 22:49
86,662
-49
29 Oct 2026, 00:21
86,711
-45
27 Oct 2026, 23:27
86,756
-33
26 Oct 2026, 22:47
86,789
-36
26 Oct 2026, 01:45
86,825
-53
25 Oct 2026, 04:48
86,878
-27
24 Oct 2026, 03:47
86,905
-30
23 Oct 2026, 03:57
86,935
-20
22 Oct 2026, 05:19
86,955
-48
20 Oct 2026, 20:36
87,003
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 25 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 197 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈448
Videos
≈5,340
Links
≈1,280
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
30m 34s
Average length
1m 32s
Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,404 reactions across 22 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
1,924
30.0%
🤬
1,165
18.2%
❤
554
8.65%
👏
552
8.62%
👍
410
6.40%
🤔
350
5.47%
😁
308
4.81%
💩
242
3.78%
🙏
236
3.69%
🤯
209
3.26%
👎
106
1.66%
🤡
77
1.20%
😢
68
1.06%
😱
49
0.765%
🕊
44
0.687%
🖕
36
0.562%
🥰
24
0.375%
🤩
18
0.281%
😨
17
0.265%
🎉
10
0.156%
1 further kind
5
0.078%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,404 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2026 to 12 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
"The plan of the Great Reset is that you will die with nothing."
Australian senator, Malcolm Roberts, dropping serious truth bombs about the WEF—and its dystopian Great Reset agenda—in the Australian parliament.
Subscribe to @HATSTRUTH 🎩
Cameras are going up everywhere for mass surveillance not public safety. They are linked to the new Al data centres. The 'elites' know when the masses 'wake up' they are going to need these control systems Your taxes are paying for this. You are paying for your own subjugation.
~ Andrew Bridgen
Subscribe to @HATSTRUTH 🎩
The nuclear farce of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Explanation to the historical-military fake of the "Atomic Bomb” and the ”Nuclear Fear" and the blatant inconsistencies about the destructions of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
They did the same thing as in Dresden. All three cities were Christian. Coincidence, of course not. Fire bombing
Subscribe to @HATSTRUTH 🎩
micro dosing baking soda and lathering hydrogen peroxide is all the preventative cancer treatment a person needs on top of brocoli and curcuma, good sleep, a proper diet, plenty of sunshine and EMF shielding... consult holistic sources for more on how to....
Subscribe to @HATSTRUTH 🎩
Q, Anon or Qanon PsyOp created by Bannon & Epstein.
It was originally called Cicada, and also originally based on Operation Trust.
Subscribe to @HATSTRUTH 🎩
Cathedrals have fascinated me he first moment i saw one.
They are cosmic puzzle pieces and in my opinion one of humanities greatest achievements.
Subscribe to @HATSTRUTH 🎩
it never changes, same story
Subscribe to @HATSTRUTH 🎩
🤔66🤡27🔥23🕊8❤6👍6🤯6🙏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @HATSTRUTH. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @HATSTRUTH as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
21 October 2026
Most recent seen missing
21 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
39 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 107 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 119 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
🇨🇦 Private Canadian News 🇨🇦 @PrivateCanadianNews · 19,673 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 29 September 2026
Majestic 12 Hub @Majestic12Mirror · 22,187 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 20 September 2026
Child Covid Vaccine Injuries UK @childcovidvaccineinjuriesuk · 18,831 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 October 2026
General Patton @General_PattonQ · 19,748 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 28 September 2026
Australiaforfreedom @australiaforfreedom · 19,380 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 30 September 2026
Daily Bible Devotionals @dailybibledevotionals2 · 19,855 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 27 September 2026
Dr. Alan Mandell @alan_mandell_official · 22,537 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 20 September 2026
Good Lion Films @goodlionx · 22,048 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 2 October 2026
Reignite Democracy @reignitedemocracy · 22,103 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 September 2026
Dr. Lynn Fynn’s Science Enlightenment Channel & Stuff @DrLynnFynn · 23,881 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 16 September 2026
TRUTH PUPS @TruthPups · 20,992 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 23 September 2026
Lee Merritt MD: FreedomDoc1 @FreedomDoc1 · 24,343 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 September 2026
Michael Jaco • Mike Jaco @MikeJaco · 19,088 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 2 October 2026
Dr John B. @DrJohnB · 21,069 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 September 2026
John Durham @johndurhamchannel · 23,733 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 16 September 2026
Midnight Rider Channel 🇺🇸 @realKarliBonne · 179,884 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 September 2026
INFOWARS.COM 🚫🚫🚫 @infowarslive · 22,176 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 September 2026
🔴 Blazing Press 🔴 BP NEWS @trumpetnews1 · 19,166 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 2 October 2026
RealTimeNews™ @dailyrealtimenews · 19,111 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 30 September 2026
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HATS 🎩” (@HATSTRUTH), 86,240 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HATSTRUTH.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.