Photo, posted without a caption
🙏1

Channel
@UnitedNonCompliancePatriots
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
358subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002093188807 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @UnitedNonCompliancePatriots |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/UnitedNonCompliancePatriots |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 02:41 | 358 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:28 | 359 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 361 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:23 | 360 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 362 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 362 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 33.3% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 33.3% | |
| 🤮 | 2 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
🙏1
WOW! The DOJ and Jeanine Pirro have Dr. Fauci's contempt of Congress referral and even CNN is SOUNDING THE ALARM that he might actually be PROSECUTED CNN: "This is real. I mean the stakes here for Dr. Fauci could potentially be depending what DOJ decides for criminal indictment and prosecution!" 🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork 📎 X (Twitter)▪️Truth Social
👍1
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=u5h2OCcKYkc
Photo, posted without a caption
👍1
Bhattacharya said transparency would be central to the NIH under his leadership. “Science requires you to say, ‘Here’s what I’ve done. Here’s the data. Please check me,’” he said. “That kind of transparency is absolutely vital to science,” Bhattacharya added. “What I saw during the pandemic was censorship instead of science, and that is the death of any scientific culture.” He said the agency had turned a page fro…
Half human, half horse and entirely built for rescue work, a California startup has unveiled Threehalves, a two-meter-tall robotic centaur designed to operate in disaster zones too dangerous for human responders. https://www.ynetnews.com/tech-and-digital/article/r1hzyy6sml Indestructible? For disaster zones? But why the name and devil face?
Foundation Future Industries, a start-up founded in 2024, aims to leverage humanoid robots for military and industrial work, rather than household tasks and the service sector. The start-up has already tested its humanoid robots in Ukraine and is aiming to soon bring its technology to the U.S. military. The robotics company recently brought on Eric Trump, the son of the sitting president, as a chief strategy adviso…
“We think there’s a moral imperative to put these robots into war instead of soldiers,” says Mike LeBlanc, a 14-year Marine Corps veteran with multiple tours of Iraq and Afghanistan, who is a co-founder of Foundation, the company that makes Phantom. He says the aim is for the robot to wield “any kind of weapon that a human can.” https://time.com/article/2026/03/09/ai-robots-soldiers-war/ But what about the people w…
I don’t know about you, but if I follow the news on the world wide Artificial Intelligence developments, I often wonder if the world has gone totally insane. From the destroying of our books, the selling of sunlight to the race of robotic warfare... Do we still have a future left to live for? Click here to read: https://open.substack.com/pub/fallofthecabalofficial/p/ai-out-of-control-or-controlled-apocalypse?r=5ax…
Where are the children??
Good compilation of Fauci's lies. Something everyone needs to watch. This will give a new definition to the term 'misinformation' and will indemnify all of us truth-speakers from this hated term. Please spread on all social media in order to reach as many sleepers as possible.
MIT Aeronautics Department's Jamie Perair interviewed Elon Musk on Oct. 24, 2014. During that conversation, Musk made a controversial statement that with artificial intelligence they are summoning a demon. Is it that far-fetched? Not if you research the belief systems of the elite... Tucker Carslon's interview gives some more insight in the matter... Combine the thought of opening portals in CERN and the AI devel…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @UnitedNonCompliancePatriots. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“United Non Compliance Patriots” (@UnitedNonCompliancePatriots), 358 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UnitedNonCompliancePatriots.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.