2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 136–138 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 23:16
137
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:40
137
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 4 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
33.6%
avg views ÷ 137 subscribers
Avg views / post
46.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
8.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held
18 (4 September 2025 – 27 July 2026)
Views total
46
Reactions total
4
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 23:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
113
Videos
3
Links
188
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
95 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5235612352694461848
20
21.1%
custom 5240030083040682149
18
18.9%
❤
13
13.7%
🔥
13
13.7%
🫡
13
13.7%
🤯
10
10.5%
custom 5237899560218534031
6
6.32%
🗿
2
2.11%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2025 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @busysam. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 September 2025 to 27 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Производительность Firefox растет, но до Chrome ему еще далеко
Вчера наконец выпустил долгожданный апдейт Browserating — сайта, где я собираю синтетические тесты скорости отрисовки страниц в популярных браузерах (подробнее о проекте и почему в нем нет смысла)
На первых позициях опять браузеры на движке Chromium, тут новостей нет.
Интересно, что почти все браузеры на движке-конкуренте Gecko показали заметный рост:
-…
OpenAI объявили, что поддержка браузера ChatGPT Atlas прекратится 9 августа. Таким образом, ChatGPT Atlas просуществовал меньше год — его анонсировали в октябре 2025
У меня на него были большие надежды в плане конкуренции с другими ИИ-браузерами. В отличие от Dia, которая учится на истории пользователя, OpenAI уже имели огромный массив персонализированной информации о юзере. Но то ли юзеров оказалось слишком мало, т…
Нейросети это, конечно, круто и полезно, но есть одна проблема — их этичность. У многих массовых LLM-сервисов для физлиц (ChatGPT, Copilot и т.п.) по умолчанию включена опция использовать ваши чаты для обучения моделей — отключить можно в настройках. API-провайдеры в этом плане получше, но рядовой пользователь вряд ли будет заморачиваться с оплатой за токены. ChatGPT тестирует рекламу в США для бесплатного тарифа — о…
Если вы боитесь что друг остановит вас на улице и начнет неистово искать в вашем Youtube какие мемные видео вы смотрели 4 года назад, но полностью удалять историю просмотра вы не хотите, есть выход:
1. Перейдите на сайт Google Мои Действия во вкладку “История Youtube” — https://myactivity.google.com/activitycontrols?settings=youtube&facs=1
2. Внизу кликните “Настроить автоматическое удаление”
3. Выберите желаемое вр…
AdGuard VPN открыл исходный код своего протокола TrustTunnel
Популярный блокировщик рекламы, выпустивший также свой VPN, утверждает, что TrustTunnel — это безопасный VPN-протокол, оптимизированный для мобильных устройств. К сожалению, такие популярные протоколы как OpenVPN, WireGuard и IPSec некоторые правительства научились обнаруживать и блокировать на сетевом уровне, а попытки скрыть VPN-трафик часто снижают скор…
Убираем водяные знаки с изображений Gemini
- Работает на стороне клиента — Нет бэкенда, нет обработки на сервере. Ваши данные остаются в вашем браузере
- Приватность — Изображения никогда не загружаются ни на какой сервер
- Математическая точность — Основано на формуле обратного альфа-смешивания, а не на "галлюцинирующих" моделях ИИ
- Автоматическое определение — Умное распознавание вариантов водяных знаков 48×48 ил…
Raycast выпустил тизер-видео о том, чего стоит ожидать от обновления в следующем году. Подробности "early next year"
В комментариях под постом на Reddit разработчики подтвердили:
- AI Chat в Windows версии
- Синхронизацию между macOS и Windows
- Обновления внешнего вида под Liquid Glass (и более компактный компактный режим)
- Голосовой ввод
Если нас действительно ждет качественно сделанный голосовой ввод и запись з…
AI‑чаты 8 млн пользователей тихо продавали “приватные” расширения
TL;DR: бесплатные браузерные VPN (Urban VPN Proxy и его клоны) с июля 2025 перехватывали диалоги с ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini и прочими. Скрипт влезает на страницу, подменяет fetch/XMLHttpRequest, пакует промпты+ответы+таймстемпы и шлёт на серверы Urban/BiScience “для маркетинговой аналитики”
Почему это важно
• Многие недооценивают как много прав есть …
Извините, с утра просто не успел коммент написать по этой теме.
По ссылке выше — статья в РБК, где РКН хвастается, что смог заблокировать SOCKS5, L2TP и VLESS. Давайте коротко объясню что за протоколы:
* SOCKS5 — это простой прокси-протокол, который просто пересылает трафик «как есть» между клиентом и сервером. Он не шифрует данные, не меняет их и не пытается понять, что внутри. Его задача — стать промежуточной точ…
Многие боятся ИИ в браузерах. Во многом потому, что вы даёте максимально приватную информацию "думающим" моделям, и непонятно, как её будут использовать (возможно, против вас). Альтернативой этому может стать использование локальных LLM-моделей, но есть нюанс…
Даже на относительно мощном железе они работают крайне слабо. Чтобы это проверить, скачайте LM Studio или Ollama и запустите BrowserOS. Эта программа позволяе…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @busysam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Деловой Сергей” (@busysam), 137 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/busysam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.