Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Деловой Сергей

@busysam

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

137subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001408350742
TypeChannel
Username@busysam
DescriptionРассказываю о приватности, защите данных и умной технологичности. Безопасные приложения, конфиденциальность, продуктивность. @kawaiier
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/busysam

Growth

1377 Aug 2026, 17:40 — 137 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 23:16 — 137 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 17:408 Aug 2026, 23:16
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 136–138 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 23:16137no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:40137first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 4 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.6%
avg views ÷ 137 subscribers
Avg views / post
46.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
8.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held18 (4 September 202527 July 2026)
Views total46
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 23:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
113
Videos
3
Links
188

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

95 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52356123526944618482021.1%
custom 52400300830406821491818.9%
1313.7%
🔥1313.7%
🫡1313.7%
🤯1010.5%
custom 523789956021853403166.32%
🗿22.11%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2025 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @busysam. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 September 2025 to 27 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 15:56 UTC46 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Производительность Firefox растет, но до Chrome ему еще далеко Вчера наконец выпустил долгожданный апдейт Browserating — сайта, где я собираю синтетические тесты скорости отрисовки страниц в популярных браузерах (подробнее о проекте и почему в нем нет смысла) На первых позициях опять браузеры на движке Chromium, тут новостей нет. Интересно, что почти все браузеры на движке-конкуренте Gecko показали заметный рост: -

4

10 Jul 2026, 12:44 UTC93 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

OpenAI объявили, что поддержка браузера ChatGPT Atlas прекратится 9 августа. Таким образом, ChatGPT Atlas просуществовал меньше год — его анонсировали в октябре 2025 У меня на него были большие надежды в плане конкуренции с другими ИИ-браузерами. В отличие от Dia, которая учится на истории пользователя, OpenAI уже имели огромный массив персонализированной информации о юзере. Но то ли юзеров оказалось слишком мало, т

🫡5

3 Mar 2026, 19:13 UTC329 views9 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Нейросети это, конечно, круто и полезно, но есть одна проблема — их этичность. У многих массовых LLM-сервисов для физлиц (ChatGPT, Copilot и т.п.) по умолчанию включена опция использовать ваши чаты для обучения моделей — отключить можно в настройках. API-провайдеры в этом плане получше, но рядовой пользователь вряд ли будет заморачиваться с оплатой за токены. ChatGPT тестирует рекламу в США для бесплатного тарифа — о

🔥7custom 52356123526944618482

22 Feb 2026, 18:52 UTC225 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Если вы боитесь что друг остановит вас на улице и начнет неистово искать в вашем Youtube какие мемные видео вы смотрели 4 года назад, но полностью удалять историю просмотра вы не хотите, есть выход: 1. Перейдите на сайт Google Мои Действия во вкладку “История Youtube” — https://myactivity.google.com/activitycontrols?settings=youtube&facs=1 2. Внизу кликните “Настроить автоматическое удаление” 3. Выберите желаемое вр

🫡3

17 Feb 2026, 06:18 UTC197 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ru_tech_talk

AdGuard VPN открыл исходный код своего протокола TrustTunnel Популярный блокировщик рекламы, выпустивший также свой VPN, утверждает, что TrustTunnel — это безопасный VPN-протокол, оптимизированный для мобильных устройств. К сожалению, такие популярные протоколы как OpenVPN, WireGuard и IPSec некоторые правительства научились обнаруживать и блокировать на сетевом уровне, а попытки скрыть VPN-трафик часто снижают скор

custom 52378995602185340311

23 Dec 2025, 11:14 UTC267 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Убираем водяные знаки с изображений Gemini - Работает на стороне клиента — Нет бэкенда, нет обработки на сервере. Ваши данные остаются в вашем браузере - Приватность — Изображения никогда не загружаются ни на какой сервер - Математическая точность — Основано на формуле обратного альфа-смешивания, а не на "галлюцинирующих" моделях ИИ - Автоматическое определение — Умное распознавание вариантов водяных знаков 48×48 ил

custom 52356123526944618482

19 Dec 2025, 06:18 UTC244 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Raycast выпустил тизер-видео о том, чего стоит ожидать от обновления в следующем году. Подробности "early next year" В комментариях под постом на Reddit разработчики подтвердили: - AI Chat в Windows версии - Синхронизацию между macOS и Windows - Обновления внешнего вида под Liquid Glass (и более компактный компактный режим) - Голосовой ввод Если нас действительно ждет качественно сделанный голосовой ввод и запись з

1custom 52400300830406821491

17 Dec 2025, 08:10 UTC170 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В новой версии Raycast добавили Raycast Wrapped — итоги года на основе использования программы Делитесь своими итогами в комментариях!

custom 52356123526944618483custom 52378995602185340312

16 Dec 2025, 13:55 UTC156 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

AI‑чаты 8 млн пользователей тихо продавали “приватные” расширения TL;DR: бесплатные браузерные VPN (Urban VPN Proxy и его клоны) с июля 2025 перехватывали диалоги с ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini и прочими. Скрипт влезает на страницу, подменяет fetch/XMLHttpRequest, пакует промпты+ответы+таймстемпы и шлёт на серверы Urban/BiScience “для маркетинговой аналитики” Почему это важно • Многие недооценивают как много прав есть

🤯4custom 52400300830406821492

4 Dec 2025, 16:47 UTC171 views5 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @zatelecom

Извините, с утра просто не успел коммент написать по этой теме. По ссылке выше — статья в РБК, где РКН хвастается, что смог заблокировать SOCKS5, L2TP и VLESS. Давайте коротко объясню что за протоколы: * SOCKS5 — это простой прокси-протокол, который просто пересылает трафик «как есть» между клиентом и сервером. Он не шифрует данные, не меняет их и не пытается понять, что внутри. Его задача — стать промежуточной точ

custom 52400300830406821494🤯1

8 Nov 2025, 17:44 UTC231 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Многие боятся ИИ в браузерах. Во многом потому, что вы даёте максимально приватную информацию "думающим" моделям, и непонятно, как её будут использовать (возможно, против вас). Альтернативой этому может стать использование локальных LLM-моделей, но есть нюанс… Даже на относительно мощном железе они работают крайне слабо. Чтобы это проверить, скачайте LM Studio или Ollama и запустите BrowserOS. Эта программа позволяе

custom 52356123526944618487🤯3custom 52378995602185340312

28 Oct 2025, 17:57 UTC231 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52400300830406821492

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @busysam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Деловой Сергей” (@busysam), 137 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/busysam.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.