Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Kорневой DoStup

@root_kit_NEWS

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

780subscribers

+14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001748343348
TypeChannel
Username@root_kit_NEWS
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/root_kit_NEWS

Growth

7667807736 August 2026 — 766 subscribers6 August 2026 — 766 subscribers13 August 2026 — 780 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 764–782 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 07:25780+14
6 Aug 2026, 15:49766no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:35766first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 25 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.3%
avg views ÷ 780 subscribers
Avg views / post
259
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (25 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,816
Reactions total91
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

188 reactions across 17 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3920.7%
😁3820.2%
🔥2613.8%
💔189.57%
🤡115.85%
🏆105.32%
💯105.32%
😢84.26%
👍52.66%
❤‍🔥42.13%
🌚31.60%
🤯31.60%
🍾21.06%
😱21.06%
🤔21.06%
10.532%
🍓10.532%
👎10.532%
👏10.532%
💩10.532%
2 further kinds21.06%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 188reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC111 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ощущение, что многие из ИБ-рынка просто не знают, как работает журналистика изнутри, да и вообще, про что это. В отрасли приходится сталкиваться с людьми, имеющими неизвестно откуда возникшее представление, что по первому «ай, мне больно», можно из СМИ убрать текст. А потом еще и ныть могут, мол, журналистика у вас какая-то необъективная. Догма Ведомостей уже давным-давно была послана нахуй, однако это первое что я

13🔥7💩1

4 Aug 2026, 10:22 UTC124 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @PR_machine_Nika

В полях ветер Про опасные универсальные рекомендации в антикризисном PR С вашей подачи, дорогие папищеки, послушала запись екатеринбургского спин-оффа Marketing Stars «Антикризисный PR: вы готовы ко взлому?». Забавно, что я сама заявлялась с докладом «Мифы антикризисных коммуникаций при киберинцидентах» на московскую конфу, но как-то не срослось. Вчера Алексей разродился блогом про ключевые тезисы оттуда, ну, думаю

5👍3🍾2🍓1🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 13:36 UTC205 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Обычный разговор делового журналиста со спикером, чья компания купила другую компанию

😁11❤‍🔥4

24 Jul 2026, 12:05 UTC315 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Устали от скучных разговоров? Подкаст с моей кошкой Бонни, говорим о качестве корма, кошаков-шаболд из соседнего подъезда и обсуждаем киберзащиту в ветеренарках: есть ли риск, что фото твоей мохнатой задницы утечет в сеть?

😁8🔥64🤣1

17 Jul 2026, 09:59 UTC347 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Побыл вчера в шкуре спикера на Marketing Stars, "Компьютерра" заботливо прописала главные выводы оттуда. Жаль, что в репортаж не вошел самый "горячий" вопрос круглого стола о том, норм ли использовать хакеров в СМИ (по нашему мнению норм, поскольку только так можно осмотреть инцидент со всех сторон). Вопрос из зала задала некая Юлия Салагаева из Fplus. Одну из своих мыслей дам тут: Самое важное — чтобы горели глаза

🏆103🔥1😁1

16 Jul 2026, 10:47 UTC334 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

На что россиян попросят пересесть теперь?

  1. ОС "Аврора"27%
  2. На бересду60%
  3. Harmony OS17%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

15 Jul 2026, 13:06 UTC380 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

В десятых в РФ было популярно движение футбольных фанатов, перешедшее из Англии, так называемое "околофутбола" или просто ОФ. Каждый третий миллениал хоть раз был на опушке с бинтами на руках, или каким либо образом еще принимал участие в этом движении. Сейчас они тоже есть, но эпоха ушла, ввели Fan ID и все потухло. Главной целью всех заруб было заявление о себе, конторы (так называются группы или команды фан сектор

4🔥4👏1

12 Jul 2026, 12:56 UTC371 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

М-да. С каждым разом убеждаюсь, что Авито, это отражение реальности в РФ

💯4🌚3🤯2

6 Jul 2026, 10:49 UTC316 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Очень странная история. Рынок падает, заводы страдают, а тут ребята решаются вложить 38 млрд в бытовую технику, не понятно какого бренда, не понятно что именно собираются делать. Ко по мне, в нынешней ситуации - деньги на ветер

🔥2😁2🤡1

6 Jul 2026, 10:49 UTC370 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @zhabinpishet

В России планируют построить еще один завод бытовой техники. На первом этапе хотят вложить $400 млн и запустить крупноузловую сборку. Тут интереснее даже не то, что производить технику придется на падающем рынке, а то, что компания заявляет, что хочет запустить полный цикл производства электроники - смартфонов, компьютеров, батареек, ламп и телевизоров. И даже говорят, что планиурют делать свои чипы. Звучит это вс

6 Jul 2026, 06:42 UTC317 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @sec_postPhoto

🤩🤩🤩🤩: Российский производитель NGFW «Новые Платформы» в 3 раза увеличит мощности. ⏩Компания "Новые Платформы", принадлежащая в том числе сыну гендиректора "Кода Безопасности", в 2026 году увеличит мощность производства с 30 тыс. устройств до 100 тыс., выяснил SecPost😍. ⏩В компании пояснили, что в увеличение будет инвестировано порядка 70 -150 млн руб, а NGFW займет 50% готовой продукции. Но участники рынка сомневаю

🔥21👍1

3 Jul 2026, 19:08 UTC≈2,700 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Невероятно печальные новости.... Ушел из жизни Александр Калинин, основатель "Аквариуса", Yadro, НКК и многого другого; настоящий пионер российского ИТ и электроники. Довелось не раз лично общаться с Александром Николаевичем, поздравлять друг друга с праздниками и днём рождения, как жаль, как больно и обидно. Я выражаю соболезнования родственникам и близким, нам очень сильно будет не хватать Александра Калинина.

💔14😢8👎1🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @root_kit_NEWS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Jul 2026, 10:47 UTCAnonymous Poll30 voters

На что россиян попросят пересесть теперь?

  1. ОС "Аврора"27%
  2. На бересду60%
  3. Harmony OS17%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 271,285 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kорневой DoStup” (@root_kit_NEWS), 780 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/root_kit_NEWS.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.