Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 97 days, net +688. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,091–12,289 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 04:18
12,151
+84
9 Nov 2026, 10:08
12,067
+224
7 Nov 2026, 22:48
11,843
+63
6 Nov 2026, 22:44
11,780
+11
5 Nov 2026, 22:45
11,769
+46
4 Nov 2026, 22:39
11,723
+82
3 Nov 2026, 23:08
11,641
+31
2 Nov 2026, 20:17
11,610
+117
1 Nov 2026, 18:50
11,493
+264
31 Oct 2026, 19:20
11,229
-4
30 Oct 2026, 20:30
11,233
-3
29 Oct 2026, 23:29
11,236
-4
28 Oct 2026, 23:48
11,240
-4
27 Oct 2026, 23:50
11,244
-3
26 Oct 2026, 02:11
11,247
-4
23 Oct 2026, 22:29
11,251
-2
22 Oct 2026, 22:31
11,253
-2
21 Oct 2026, 21:55
11,255
-8
19 Oct 2026, 17:10
11,263
-6
18 Oct 2026, 18:51
11,269
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 26 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
165.5%
avg views ÷ 12,151 subscribers
Avg views / post
20,100
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
21 (26 February 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
140,760
Reactions total
2,030
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 20:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
949
Videos
109
Links
820
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
44s
Average length
15s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
10,223 reactions across 21 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
3,324
32.5%
❤🔥
2,339
22.9%
🤬
1,434
14.0%
❤
1,324
13.0%
👍
1,058
10.3%
😁
477
4.67%
👏
155
1.52%
🍾
24
0.235%
😱
22
0.215%
🤔
21
0.205%
🤗
16
0.157%
😭
12
0.117%
🤯
12
0.117%
⚡
5
0.049%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,223 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 26 February 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 7 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
СКОЛЬКО ПОГИБШИХ НА СТОРОНЕ РФ В ВОЙНЕ С УКРАИНОЙ
Киберпартизаны подсчитали погибших в войне по данным из Росстата за период с 2022 г по 27 августа 2026 года. При подсчете учитывали только умерших, у которых в причине смерти явно указано, что человек погиб в результате военных/боевых действий.
⏺ИТОГ — минимум 393 881 погибших на стороне РФ в войне с Украиной.
Как посчитали
Из общей базы регистрации смертей, собра…
📊 Мы немного нарушили работу сайта Федеральной службы статистики РФ на днях. До сих пор работает плохо, и они предупредили, что будут опаздывать с публикациями.
Не страшно, мы поможем Росстату опубликовать данные по ВВП за 3 квартал 2026 года. А то не факт, что справятся. 😏
Файл с расчетами по ВВП РФ из внутренней сети Росстата можно скачать на нашем сайте (из Беларуси с VPN⚠️) или в комментариях к посту.
Пока вед…
☄️ СЕКРЕТНАЯ СТАТИСТИКА РОССТАТА — ГОСТАЙНОЕ СТАНОВИТСЯ ЯВНЫМ ☄️
Росстат попадает на те же грабли, на которые прыгали в Роскомнадзоре и Аэрофлоте после наших атак: заявляют, якобы утечки данных не зафиксировано.
Что ж, давайте поможем Росстату зафиксировать утечку. 😏
🔺Выкладываем письма с грифом ДСП и секретной статистикой.
🔺Делимся уникальными показателями с захваченных территорий Украины (население, промышленност…
❗️КИБЕРАТАКА НА РОССТАТ — СЛУЖБУ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЙ СТАТИСТИКИ РФ ❗️
Киберпартизаны вместе с коллегами Silent Crow уничтожили сердце Росстата, куда стекались все ключевые данные по социально-экономическим показателям путинского режима.
🔥 Зачистили IT инфраструктуру Росстата: базы данных, сервера, среду виртуализации, документооборот, рабочие станции, АРМ, VPN.
🔥 Уничтожили ключевые системы СТАТЭК, ЦСОД, Демография, СЭ…
‼️ КРИТИЧЕСКОЕ ОБНОВЛЕНИЕ ПАРТИЗАНСКОГО ТЕЛЕГРАМА ДЛЯ КОМПЬЮТЕРОВ
В Telegram для компьютеров (как в официальном, так и партизанском) была обнаружена опасная уязвимость. При клике на вредоносную ссылку мошенники могли незаметно украсть файлы с компьютера жертвы и сессию аккаунта. Это значит, что могли пользоваться этим аккаунтом, иметь доступ ко всем данным (кроме секретных чатов), и при этом владельцу не пришло бы у…
▶️ Онлайн игра Партизаны против Лукашенко. Сделана одним из киберов в рамках тестирования рабочих инструментов.
Играть онлайн (не забываем про VPN)
Шатаем режим даже в игровой форме. 😉 Поднимите себе настроение на кофе-паузе.
😒 Киберпартизаны 3 года скрытно использовали сеть Департамента здравоохранения Москвы с полным доступом к данным, прежде чем рашисты хоть что-то заметили. Нам редко выпадает возможность рассказать о своих непубличных проектах. Делимся уникальными подробностями.
На сайте Киберпартизан. (из Беларуси с VPN ⚠️)
Без VPN - по ссылке.
Кратко по сути:
🔹 В 2023 году мы проникли в сеть Департамента здравоохранения Москвы.
🔹 …
✊ Отмечаем день Киберпартизана на портале RCE.by
Лукашистский портал rce.by "Республиканской конфедерации предпринимательства" — очередная фикция для игры в "демократию" старика-тирана. На деле контролируется прикорытниками. Эти "общественные деятели" способствуют новым должностям для бывших карателей и признанию национальной БЧБ символики экстремистской.
Кстати, для тех, кто не в курсе хакерской темы: RCE означает…
⚠️ Друзья, с вечера 23 по 27 июля по техническим причинам некоторые наши боты не обрабатывали входящие сообщения. Если вы писали что-то в этот период и не получили ответа, продублируйте, пожалуйста, сообщения в тот же бот.
Нашли Анжелику Мельникову — теперь уже точно
🔸 Установили ее актуальное место проживания.
🔸 Подтвердили фейковую личность.
🔸 Дополнили историю другими деталями, читайте в статье. 👇
На сайте Киберпартизан. (из Беларуси с VPN ⚠️)
Без VPN - по ссылке.
Расходимся, ребята! 😂
Верховный суд РФ признал Киберпартизан и SilentCrow экстремистскими организациями и запретил их деятельность на территории страны.
Это первый случай, когда в РФ экстремистами объявляют хакерские организации. Остановить нас не могут, поэтому хоть что-то делают, чтобы отслужиться.
Генпрокуратура РФ обвинила нас в том, что мы занимаемся "дестабилизацией социальной и политической обстановки в цел…
❤303😁137🔥55❤🔥16👍12
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @cpartisans_by. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 51 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Полк Каліноўскага @belwarriors · 21,654 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 September 2026
Наша Ніва @nashaniva · 22,087 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
МотолькоПомоги @motolkohelp · 22,408 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Cyber Partisans(en.wikipedia.org) “…Belarus Cyber Partisans logo.jpg
|image_size =
|website = {{URL|https://t.me/cpartisans_by}}
|caption = [[Telegram (software)|Telegram]] group logo
|formation…” read 1 November 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Киберпартизаны BY” (@cpartisans_by), 12,151 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cpartisans_by.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.