Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 51 days, net -412. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,191–35,727 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 17:20
35,253
-37
19 Sept 2026, 01:58
35,290
-11
16 Sept 2026, 17:18
35,301
-16
14 Sept 2026, 19:01
35,317
-35
13 Sept 2026, 07:19
35,352
-27
11 Sept 2026, 08:41
35,379
-13
8 Sept 2026, 15:18
35,392
-26
5 Sept 2026, 10:01
35,418
-17
3 Sept 2026, 16:36
35,435
-8
2 Sept 2026, 10:57
35,443
-8
1 Sept 2026, 12:37
35,451
-10
31 Aug 2026, 14:07
35,461
-4
30 Aug 2026, 14:08
35,465
-2
29 Aug 2026, 14:35
35,467
-9
28 Aug 2026, 13:37
35,476
-9
27 Aug 2026, 10:26
35,485
-11
26 Aug 2026, 08:03
35,496
-16
25 Aug 2026, 07:56
35,512
-5
24 Aug 2026, 11:07
35,517
-17
22 Aug 2026, 20:33
35,534
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 87 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.9%
avg views ÷ 35,253 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,720
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 September 2026
Posts held
20 (4 March 2026 – 14 September 2026)
Views total
7,720
Reactions total
156
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 05:43 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
356
Videos
5
Links
530
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
3,472 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😡
1,077
31.0%
❤
715
20.6%
😨
540
15.6%
🙈
484
13.9%
👍
476
13.7%
👎
105
3.02%
👨💻
69
1.99%
💯
6
0.173%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,472 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 March 2026 to 14 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 20 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @NetFreedomsProject. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 March 2026 to 14 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
❗️За последние сутки администраторы уже шести популярных независимых русскоязычных независимых Telegram-каналов сообщили о массовой накрутке подписчиков
Массовая накрутка сама по себе не означает, что канал взломан. Но такой всплеск стоит рассматривать как возможный элемент подготовки к атаке — например, последующими жалобами на канал или попытками создать видимость нарушения правил Telegram.
Варианты действий адми…
🚨 Риски для пользователей Telegram из-за обвинений Дурова в содействии террористической деятельности
Наибольшие риски возникают у пользователей Telegram-ботом «Дайвинчик | Leo – знакомства, общение и новые друзья». В нём более 13 миллионов пользователей.
Задержаны 46 граждан РФ в возрасте от 12 до 22 лет, являвшихся пользователями указанного telegram-сервиса.
В отношении них возбуждены уголовные дела по ч. 1 и ч. …
Пакет санкций за нарушение цифровых прав
Опубликован регламент европейских санкций в отношении технологических компаний. Основания для введения ограничений заслуживают отдельного разбора.
Ключевой документ для введения этого пакета санкций — доклад Специального докладчика Комитета по правам человека ООН от 15 сентября 2025 года о ситуации с правами человека в России, а формулировки опубликованного сегодня регламент…
Верховный Суд впервые с зимы открыл данные судебной статистики. Правда, только за первое полугодие 2025 года, но уже что-то
Что мы узнали о делах, связанных с публикациями в интернете?
🟢 Четыре года стабильно снижается количество приговоренных за призывы к экстремистской деятельности по статье 280 УК. Количество приговоров за такое преступление снизилось со 161 до 73.
🟢 Восемь лет стабильно падает количество осужд…
С 7 июля российским сайтам и приложениям запрещено авторизовывать вход пользователей через иностранные сервисы
Заходить в личные кабинеты российских сайтов и приложений с авторизацией через иностранную почту закон разрешает и дальше, но не всем. Разбираемся в деталях.
В этот день вступает в силу новая статья 13.55 КоАП, которая предусматривает штрафы для владельцев сайтов и приложений, которые разрешат авторизовать…
Электронная подпись для россиян за рубежом
С 1 июля 2026 года Правительство РФ в порядке эксперимента разрешит гражданам страны получать квалифицированную электронную подпись (УКЭП) на территории 12 стран — в Армении, Вьетнаме, Индии, Индонезии, Казахстане, Киргизии, Китае, Малайзии, Объединенных Арабских Эмиратах, Сербии, Турции и Узбекистане.
Идентификация заявителей с целью выдачи им квалифицированных сертификат…
Можно ли пользоваться сервисами VK владельцам техники Apple?
После удаления приложений VK из Appstore можно ожидать распространения двух основных методов использования удаленных из магазина Apple приложений. Посмотрим на них с точки зрения безопасности.
🔸Первый и наиболее безопасный — использование «максофонов» — Android-смартфонов для российских приложений. Это наиболее понятный и предсказуемый вариант.
🔸Второй м…
Запрет соцсетей детям — новый глобальный тренд. Ждать ли его в России?
Во Франции законопроект об таком запрете для детей младше 15 лет рассматривается в Сенате, Великобритания объявила о планах закрыть доступ к основным соцсетям для лиц младше 16 лет, а в Австралии такой запрет действует с начала этого года.
Евросоюз активно внедряет «Закон о цифровых услугах», который требует жесткой проверки возраста для доступа…
❗️Особый риск возбуждения уголовных дел
С раннего утра русскоязычное интернет-сообщество потрясено атакой по уникальному памятнику истории и культуры — комплексу зданий Киево-Печерской лавры.
Обращаем внимание подписчиков, что сегодня в 10:17 по московскому времени официальный аккаунт Минобороны России выпустил сообщение о поражении комплекса Киево-Печерской лавры в результате использования некачественных ракет сил…
Публикуем комментарий от имени пресс-службы RuStore (VK), который поступил в реплаи к посту об исследовании приложения RuStore:
RuStore не передает данные третьим лицам и не устанавливает приложения без активного согласия пользователей. При установке и запуске RuStore пользователь может принять или отказаться от предложенных разрешений. Они нужны, например, для своевременного обновления, предзаказа игр, проверки ант…
Тот же исследователь, что разобрал телеметрию в MAX, взялся за RuStore и обнаружил, что этот сервис может быть намного опаснее
❗️Опубликованное сегодня исследование показывает, что предустановленный на большинство российских Android-смартфонов магазин приложений RuStore способен регулярно фиксировать местоположение устройства сразу несколькими способами одновременно — через GPS, мобильную сеть и идентификаторы ближа…
⚠️🛰Правительство России запретило провозить через границу средства спутниковой связи без сертификации.
Опубликовано постановление Правительства о запрете перемещения через границу четырех групп средств связи, которые позволяют принимать и(или) отправлять спутниковые сигналы, если они не прошли национальную сертификацию (РСТ).
В первую очередь, речь, безусловно, о терминалах Starlink.
Нарушение запрета грозит санк…
😡263😨48👎23👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NetFreedomsProject. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
The Moscow Times | Russia news Rusia Noticias Rússia Notícias Russland Notizie Russie Actu Nieuws रूस समाचार Berita روسیه روسيا @moscowtimes_ru · 126,476#28
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Первый отдел @deptone · 52,234 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 24 August 2026
Школа призывника | правозащитная организация @netprizyvu · 46,399 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
ДСО — Движение сознательных отказчиков @stoparmy · 56,001 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
Roskomsvoboda @roskomsvoboda · 41,212 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
Tech Talk @ru_tech_talk · 30,816 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
НА СВЯЗИ | Служба техподдержки @na_svyazi_helpdesk · 26,386 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 September 2026
Легалайз @legalayz_live · 20,595 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сетевые Свободы” (@NetFreedomsProject), 35,253 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NetFreedomsProject.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.