Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Полянский|Биржа.Медиа.Рок-н-ролл

@dpolyanskiy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

308subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003602145285
TypeChannel
Username@dpolyanskiy
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dpolyanskiy

Growth

3083103096 August 2026 — 310 subscribers6 August 2026 — 310 subscribers12 August 2026 — 308 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 308–310 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:53308-2
6 Aug 2026, 22:18310no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:46310first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
49.0%
avg views ÷ 308 subscribers
Avg views / post
151
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (14 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total3,020
Reactions total259
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 22:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

259 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥9034.7%
8131.3%
👍5621.6%
😁124.63%
💯62.32%
🐳31.16%
😍31.16%
🤩31.16%
😢20.772%
🥰20.772%
👎10.386%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 259reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC51 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🧠 ЕСЛИ ТЫ ТАКОЙ УМНЫЙ, ПОЧЕМУ ТАКОЙ БЕДНЫЙ? ПАРА МЫСЛЕЙ ОБ ОБРАЗОВАНИИ И ПСИХОЛОГИИ ИНВЕСТОРА Директор департамента образовательных программ ИК «ВЕЛЕС Капитал» Валентина Савенкова — открытие этого лета. От нее тащились все: я, продюсеры, аппаратная, слушатели. Задал ей пару вопросов о том, как научиться инвестировать. Получил интересные ответы: 🟠Экономическое образование в некотором роде мешает успешному инвестиров

6👍6😍3

6 Aug 2026, 06:31 UTC71 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

💰 БОЛЬШЕ ДЕПОЗИТАРИЕВ, ХОРОШИХ И РАЗНЫХ! ОТЛИЧНЫЕ НОВОСТИ ДЛЯ РОССИЙСКИХ КРИПТАНОВ Не за горами вступление в силу крипторегулирования. Про него в целом все понятно, кроме одного — как будет устроен в России депозитарный учет цифровых валют? Кое-что узнали об этом с Глебом Кухарчуком. Никогда не думал, что написание текста про такой, казалось бы, спокойный бизнес может быть настолько захватывающим: https://pro.rbc.

🔥6👍2😁2

5 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC86 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🦑 ПОИГРАЕМ В КАЛЬМАРА? НАЙДЕН РЫНОК С БИПОЛЯРНЫМ РАССТРОЙСТВОМ Индекс Мосбиржи с начала года до 20 июля рухнул на 31%, после чего отскочил и со «дна» сделал +20%. Вы думаете, это верх волатильности? А вот и нет! У кого случилась настоящая биполярка, так это у южнокорейского биржевого индекса KOSPI. С начала года он вырос более чем на 100%, а в июле обрушился более чем на 20%. Виноват, разумеется, ИИ... 🇰🇷 Почитайте

👍9🔥53

3 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTC112 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

👑 ЛЕЖАТЬ НА ПЕЧИ И ПОЛУЧАТЬ ₽400 ТЫС. МНЕ ТАКОЕ НРАВИТСЯ! Проинвестировать, чтобы ничего не делать и получать ₽400 тыс. в месяц. Мне нравится такой план, а вам? Для этого нужно иметь капитал от ₽34 млн до ₽47 млн и целевую доходность 10-14% годовых. Опрошенные «РБК Инвестициями» эксперты прикинули структуру портфеля, которая бы приносила такой результат. Ключевой актив — облигации (как государственные, так и корпор

🔥64🤩3👍2

31 Jul 2026, 16:19 UTC147 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🪂 КРУТОЕ ПИКЕ ЗАТОРМОЗИЛОСЬ — МОЙ ПОРТФЕЛЬ В ЛЕГКОМ МИНУСЕ Очень давно не публиковал диаграмму с моим публичным портфелем. Возможно, это к лучшему, т.к. в моменте ему было очень-очень плохо. Каким-то чудом хватило мозгов не суетиться и ничего не делать. Разве что на дивиденды, полученные от X5, я купил «Транснефть» на небольшую долю (идея — относительно быстрое закрытие дивидендного гэпа). В итоге пациента удалось

👍83🔥2

30 Jul 2026, 17:33 UTC164 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🤵🍸🔫 БОНД, ДЖЕЙМС БОНД. ЧТО КУПИТЬ ИЗ ОБЛИГАЦИЙ В НАШЕМ КАЗИНО «РОЯЛЬ» Сегодня был большой эфир по облигациям с автором проекта Zakharov Invest @zakharov_risk Кириллом Захаровым. Кирилл, рисковик со стажем, не доверяет ОФЗ и уж точно не собирается играть в русскую рулетку с длинными госбумагами (как я). Говорит, что цикл снижения ключевой ставки находится около дна. «Туман неизвестности» давит, дальнейший потенциал

🔥96👍5

27 Jul 2026, 17:55 UTC191 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🍹НЕ ПАРЬСЯ, БУДЬ СЧАСТЛИВ... Примерно такую идею мы хотели заложить в сегодняшний эфир программы «Инвестиционный час». После долгих недель мук и страданий, российский инвестор наконец может открыть брокерское приложение и кайфануть. Чтобы передать вайб этой ситуации, придумали ход с композицией Бобби МакФеррина Don't Worry Be Happy. #интро @dpolyanskiy

🔥86👍2

27 Jul 2026, 16:13 UTC154 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

🎵 КАК ВАМ МУЗЫЧКА? РАССЛАБЛЯЕТ? Тестируем новые подходы к «Инвестчасу» с маэстро Радио РБК Иваном Якуниным. Попозже еще кое-что покажу... #интро @dpolyanskiy

🔥83

27 Jul 2026, 09:12 UTC167 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔮💵💱А ВЫ ВЕРИТЕ В АВГУСТОВСКОЕ «ПРОКЛЯТЬЕ» РУБЛЯ? «РБК Инвестиции» на выходных выпустили важный материал о том, что просходило с рублем в августе за последние 28 лет. Из него следует, что августовское «проклятье» все-таки существует. В 20 случаях доллар США демонстрировал рост к национальной валюте в этом месяце. ⛽️ Сегодня утром купил «Транснефть» «преф» на пипулечку, чисто под закрытие дивгэпа. Решил, что буду дел

👍6🔥1

24 Jul 2026, 13:30 UTC133 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @selfinvestorPhoto

🧦 Набиуллина о сигналах ЦБ: не надо искать никаких тайных смыслов Глава Банка России Эльвира Набиуллина в ходе пресс-конференции по ДКП ответила на вопрос о том, не хочет ли регулятор придумать новый индикатор своего настроения для рынка. «Не хочет. Не надо сейчас искать никаких тайных сигналов. Мы обо всем стараемся говорить и писать прямым текстом», — сказала она. Журналист, задавшая вопрос, напомнила про разные

7👍3🔥2

24 Jul 2026, 08:33 UTC151 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🕺ОБОЖАЮ ЭТОГО ПЕРСОНАЖА. ЧТОБ ВСЕ МЫ ТАК ЖИЛИ! Еду на работу, настроение не очень. Эх, сейчас бы на моречко, а не вот это вот все в 13:30 мск. Вы же подготовились к ставочке, не страшно вам? 🗣 Всем прекрасной пятницы☀️ Фото: из тг-канала «Светские крошки LIVE» @dpolyanskiy

13🔥3👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dpolyanskiy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 423,740 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Полянский|Биржа.Медиа.Рок-н-ролл” (@dpolyanskiy), 308 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dpolyanskiy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.