Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for IV Ярмарка эмитентов

Channel

IV Ярмарка эмитентов

@YARMARCA

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

996subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001946735600
TypeChannel
Username@YARMARCA
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/YARMARCA

Growth

9961,0101,0037 August 2026 — 1,010 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,010 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,009 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,000 subscribers17 August 2026 — 996 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 994–1,012 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 15:15996-4
14 Aug 2026, 14:131,000-9
11 Aug 2026, 01:351,009-1
7 Aug 2026, 09:471,010no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:361,010first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 31 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

80 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4050.0%
🔥2531.3%
1215.0%
👏22.50%
🥰11.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 23 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Jun 2026, 18:39 UTC351 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Полная запись сессии "Торговые идеи в облигациях: стратегии 2026 года" с IV Ярмарки эмитентов Спикеры: Алексей Коротовских - заместитель начальника Департамента бизнес-девелопмента и управления активами, Sovcombank Wealth Management Алексей Ребров - к.соц.н., частный инвестор, руководитель сервиса «CorpBonds.ru» Член «Ассоциации инвесторов АВО» Арсений Автухов - начальник отдела публичного анализа облигаций ПАО «Со

👍4

21 Jun 2026, 14:45 UTC280 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @goodbondsnews

Полная запись сессии "Открытый диалог с эмитентами: фокус на финансовых результатах и прогнозах" с IV Ярмарки эмитентов Модератор: Александр Рыбин - частный инвестор, член Правления Ассоциации инвесторов АВО, автор канала «Манька Аблигация» Часть 1 Спикеры: Иван Шарафиев - генеральный директор ПКО «Бустер.ру» Никита Вахромеев - генеральный директор лизинговой компании «Фера» Павел Огнев - директор по корпоративным

3👍2

16 Jun 2026, 07:48 UTC381 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @goodbondsnews

Полная запись сессии "Акции: ставки вниз, облигациям пора на боковую?" с IV Ярмарки эмитентов Спикеры: Игорь Шимко - профессиональный финансист, автор канала «Igor_Shimko», сооснователь «NZT Rusfond» Кирилл Кузнецов - основатель «Усиленных Инвестиций», частный инвестор Мурад Агаев - частный инвестор, соведущий на проекте «Вредный Инвестор», руководитель направления «Долевые ценные бумаги» в АВО Модератор: Борис Му

🔥7

10 Jun 2026, 15:01 UTC478 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @goodbondsnews

Полная запись сессии "Быть или не быть: инвестор против эмитента" с IV Ярмарки эмитентов Спикеры: Константин Новик - к.ф-м.н., руководитель направления «Финансовая грамотность» АВО, автор канала «Тихие деньги» Константин Горбунов - Адвокат Московской специализированной коллегии адвокатов «Экзитум», член Правления АВО, руководитель направления «Судебная защита» в АВО 🌍 Смотреть на VK Видео 📺 Смотреть на RUTUBE 🌐 С

🔥4

5 Jun 2026, 16:24 UTC571 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @goodbondsnews

Полная запись сессии "Дефолт: как распознать и что делать?" с IV Ярмарки эмитентов Спикеры: Николай Павлов - Руководитель экспертной группы департамента корпоративных отношений Банка России Александр Рыбин - Частный инвестор. Член Правления Ассоциации инвесторов АВО. Автор канала «Манька Аблигация» Гульназ Галиева - Управляющий директор по корпоративным рейтингам «Эксперт РА» Дмитрий Александров - Управляющий дирек

👍43🔥1

5 Jun 2026, 16:12 UTC649 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🎞 Презентации с форума В ожидании видеозаписей сессий форума предлагаем ознакомиться со всеми презентациями/слайдами спикеров 🛍 Ссылка на презентации

🔥3👍2

5 Jun 2026, 09:46 UTC657 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🛍 Смотрите полный фотоотчёт с IV Ярмарки эмитентов 30.05.2026 по ссылке

🔥9👍7👏2

1 Jun 2026, 14:26 UTC808 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Что хотелось бы улучшить в сессии разбора портфелей

  1. Больше кейсов69%
  2. Увеличить длительность сессии36%
  3. Свой вариант (в комментариях)10%

The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1 Jun 2026, 14:17 UTC712 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Что понравилось в сессии разбора портфелей?

  1. Практическая польза70%
  2. Интересные кейсы48%
  3. Свой вариант (в комментариях)9%

The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1 Jun 2026, 14:13 UTC691 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Что хотелось бы улучшить в сессии эмитентов?

  1. Поставить сессию на более раннее время21%
  2. Сократить количество участников42%
  3. Свой вариант (в комментариях)39%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1 Jun 2026, 14:12 UTC652 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Что вам понравилось в сессии эмитентов?

  1. Интересные участники49%
  2. Практическая направленность дискуссии78%
  3. Свой вариант (в комментариях)8%

The shares total 135%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🔥1

1 Jun 2026, 14:10 UTC593 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Уважаемые гости IV Ярмарки эмитентов, благодарим вас за посещение и просим ответить на несколько вопросов. Будем благодарны за каждое мнение.

4

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @YARMARCA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Jun 2026, 14:26 UTCAnonymous Poll42 voters

Что хотелось бы улучшить в сессии разбора портфелей

  1. Больше кейсов69%
  2. Увеличить длительность сессии36%
  3. Свой вариант (в комментариях)10%

The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1 Jun 2026, 14:17 UTCAnonymous Poll46 voters

Что понравилось в сессии разбора портфелей?

  1. Практическая польза70%
  2. Интересные кейсы48%
  3. Свой вариант (в комментариях)9%

The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1 Jun 2026, 14:13 UTCAnonymous Poll33 voters

Что хотелось бы улучшить в сессии эмитентов?

  1. Поставить сессию на более раннее время21%
  2. Сократить количество участников42%
  3. Свой вариант (в комментариях)39%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1 Jun 2026, 14:12 UTCAnonymous Poll73 voters

Что вам понравилось в сессии эмитентов?

  1. Интересные участники49%
  2. Практическая направленность дискуссии78%
  3. Свой вариант (в комментариях)8%

The shares total 135%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 23 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“IV Ярмарка эмитентов” (@YARMARCA), 996 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YARMARCA.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.