7,2 млн рублей призового фонда и реальные задачи космической отрасли 🚀 В сентябре пройдет серия КосмоХакатонов для студентов, молодых ученых и специалистов. Участникам предстоит за два дня разработать собственное решение, поработать с экспертами и представить проект жюри. Участников ждут: 🛰 реальные задачи космической отрасли 👥 команды от 3 до 5 человек 💻 очный и онлайн-форматы 🧑💻 работа с экспертами и трекерами 🏆…

Channel
localhost
@localhost_public
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,757subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001128841695 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @localhost_public |
| Created | 11 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/localhost_public |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 01:40 | 16,757 | +2 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 20:57 | 16,755 | +2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:02 | 16,753 | -3 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 13:41 | 16,756 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 13:17 | 16,758 | +3 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 07:41 | 16,755 | +1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 16,754 | -1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:56 | 16,755 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:47 | 16,758 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:47 | 16,759 | +2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:35 | 16,757 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 16,756 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 16,758 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 16,757 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 16,762 | -4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 16,766 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 16,764 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:12 | 16,766 | -5 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 16,771 | -5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 16,776 | first reading |
Engagement
121 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 19.0%
- avg views ÷ 16,757 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,190
- 23 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.42%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 23
- of 121 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 22 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 121 (31 July 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 73,304 |
| Reactions total | 1,749 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 09:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 11m 42s
- Average length
- 25s
Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,693 reactions across 115 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 3,276 | 33.8% | |
| custom 5460655466340163557 | 2,536 | 26.2% | |
| 🤣 | 1,002 | 10.3% | |
| 💯 | 751 | 7.75% | |
| custom 5976758587966362576 | 357 | 3.68% | |
| ❤ | 330 | 3.40% | |
| custom 5783009834399961520 | 317 | 3.27% | |
| 🔥 | 210 | 2.17% | |
| custom 6041739454584983018 | 179 | 1.85% | |
| 👍 | 134 | 1.38% | |
| custom 4988169623095476855 | 121 | 1.25% | |
| 👏 | 104 | 1.07% | |
| custom 5922739847981700549 | 99 | 1.02% | |
| 🫡 | 73 | 0.753% | |
| 😢 | 70 | 0.722% | |
| custom 5312219438085343833 | 31 | 0.32% | |
| 😱 | 31 | 0.32% | |
| 👨💻 | 24 | 0.248% | |
| 🥰 | 22 | 0.227% | |
| 🤔 | 17 | 0.175% | |
| 1 further kind | 9 | 0.093% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 120 of the 121 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,213 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 121 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 42
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 8
- of 121 we hold a reading for · 7%
- Most on one post
- 25
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @localhost_public. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 121 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 4.13%
- 5 of 121 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 4
- posts carrying an erid · 4 distinct tokens
- Median views · ads
- 3,430
- over 5 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 3,960
- over 116 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VSb5zCuAFc | 1 | 20 August 2026 | 20 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFFyDm8V | 1 | 1 September 2026 | 1 September 2026 |
| 2W5zFGQQs3X | 1 | 14 August 2026 | 14 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFGobS9X | 1 | 19 August 2026 | 19 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 121 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
#техподдержка #ИИ Ну всё, так всё 😎 localhost › IT-юмор
😁59custom 546065546634016355710🤣2
✍️ М. Шуфутинский печатает
custom 546065546634016355764custom 531221943808534383331😁9custom 59227398479817005497🌚3custom 60417394545849830182😱1
#компьютер Пришлось идти на жертвы 😎 localhost › IT-юмор
🤣53👨💻7🔥7
#Linux #Windows Родненький! 😎 localhost › IT-юмор
😁58❤19👨💻1🤔1
Неловкий момент 😎localhost › IT-юмор
custom 546065546634016355748😁14💯8custom 57830098343999615201
Специалисты, которые работают с нейросетями, больше ценятся работодателями — за год спрос на них вырос на 30% Все потому, что искусственный интеллект значительно повышает эффективность работы. С ним можно автоматизировать до 50% задач, а это значит, что вы сможете зарабатывать минимум в два раза больше. Нейросети — новый устойчивый тренд, который точно нельзя упускать. На рынке выигрывают те, кто уже использует нов…
🤣21custom 57830098343999615203👨💻2custom 59227398479817005492🌚1
#интернет Ромео и Джульетта нашего времени 😎localhost › IT-юмор
😁93custom 546065546634016355714custom 592273984798170054911👏6❤2custom 60417394545849830182👨💻1
#вайб_кодер #ИИ Когда оно научится сразу нормально делать? 😎 localhost › IT-юмор
😁65
С 1 сентября, товарищи! И с днем освобождения интернета) Дети, в школу собирайтесь: мойтесь, брейтесь, похмеляйтесь! 😎 localhost › IT-юмор
😁34❤21custom 59227398479817005493
#программист Тыжпрограммист 😎 localhost › IT-юмор (с)
custom 546065546634016355751💯15custom 57830098343999615201
🔥 Active Directory используют ~90% компаний в мире. И по данным Microsoft, примерно 9 из 10 атак, которые они расследуют, так или иначе идут через него. 2 сентября покажем этот путь вживую: стенд, руки и логика атакующего от первого шага до учётной записи. На учебном стенде пройдём сценарий целиком: 🔸 почему AD — ключевая цель при атаке на корпоративную сеть 🔸 как домен выглядит глазами атакующего: пользователи, ко…
👨💻3🤣1😁1custom 59227398479817005491
Showing the 12 most recent of 121 posts we hold for @localhost_public. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@localhost_public edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 24 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 24 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@agile_minutes · 3,2043 postsBad Pixel
@BadPixels · 2,1642 postsПещера Айтишника
@itpeshchera · 7,3052 postsЛенивый вайб-программист
@Lazy_Programmer_channel · 5,0571 postLinux Club
@Linux_Club_nomer_1 · 4,4391 postLOKALKA⭕️⃤
@RingTriangle · 191 postBashMaster
@bash_help · 8,8541 postBashTex | Linux
@bash_tex · 2,5111 post🌿 Intent Garden Org
@intentgarden · 281 postIT Папа
@it_dad · 4,0961 postNetwork Admin
@networkadm · 12,3801 postNetworkAdmin.ru
@networkadminru · 4,7031 postОфисный Планктон
@office_story · 12,1491 posttapafon_red
@tapafon_red · 31 postTHINGS PROGRAMMERS DO
@thingsprogrammersdo · 16,0371 postЯ - Программист
@yaprogrammer · 5,4461 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@office_story · 12,1494 postsTHINGS PROGRAMMERS DO
@thingsprogrammersdo · 16,0374 postsNetworkAdmin.ru
@networkadminru · 4,7033 postsКринжайл | Скрам Мемы
@agile_minutes · 3,2042 postsBad Pixel
@BadPixels · 2,1642 postsBashMaster
@bash_help · 8,8542 postsПещера Айтишника
@itpeshchera · 7,3052 postsЛенивый вайб-программист
@Lazy_Programmer_channel · 5,0572 postsNetwork Admin
@networkadm · 12,3802 postsBashTex | Linux
@bash_tex · 2,5111 post🌿 Intent Garden Org
@intentgarden · 281 postIT Папа
@it_dad · 4,0961 postLinux Club
@Linux_Club_nomer_1 · 4,4391 postПесья работа
@pesdejob · 1,6141 postLOKALKA⭕️⃤
@RingTriangle · 191 postSK Реклама
@SK_Reklam · 1711 postСистемный администратор - Сетевые технологии - Компьютерная помощь
@sysadmin1 · 8,4401 postЯ - Программист
@yaprogrammer · 5,4461 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@it_dad · 4,0962 postsАлгоритмус
@algorithmus_aime · 9261 postСИНЯЯ ИЗОЛЕНТА
@canifolication · 1141 postДневники удаленщика
@erlanmurzalin · 3,5381 postVа$hе g0vn0c0diE
@g0vn0c0de · 781 postПещера Айтишника
@itpeshchera · 7,3051 postLumio Pay
@lumiopay · 1,2111 postIT юмор и мемы / MyOwnBug
@myOwnBug · 7171 postОфисный Планктон
@office_story · 12,1491 postРабы галерные
@rabynagalerah · 8,7331 postTalanto. Поиск работы в IT
@talantojob · 1,6941 postTHINGS PROGRAMMERS DO
@thingsprogrammersdo · 16,0371 postДневник Вайбкодера
@vcdiary · 3791 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@programmer_memes · 51,307
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 August 2026
@itmemes · 123,290
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
@ithumor · 60,568
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
@devopsina · 23,617
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 September 2026
@sysodmins · 38,088
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 31 August 2026
@xor_journal · 182,317
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
@timewebcloud_alerts · 27,753
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 September 2026
@lama_channel_gpt · 24,736
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 September 2026
@i_odmin · 26,669
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 September 2026
@conhum · 20,678
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 September 2026
@bashdays · 23,634
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
@operby · 35,750
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“localhost” (@localhost_public), 16,757 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/localhost_public.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.