Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for S0ER

Channel

S0ER

@softwareengineervlog

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,367subscribers

-74 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001131950102
TypeChannel
Username@softwareengineervlog
DescriptionАрхитектура | Программирование | Профессиональное развитие По всем вопросам писать на @soerdev
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held56
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/softwareengineervlog

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,36710,46710,4177 August 2026 — 10,441 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,441 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,442 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,443 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,446 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,447 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,446 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,447 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,451 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,454 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,458 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,459 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,455 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,453 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,454 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,453 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,454 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,453 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,458 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,459 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,461 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,463 subscribers5 September 2026 — 10,466 subscribers8 September 2026 — 10,467 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,461 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,454 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,449 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,451 subscribers4 October 2026 — 10,432 subscribers8 October 2026 — 10,427 subscribers13 October 2026 — 10,435 subscribers14 October 2026 — 10,426 subscribers15 October 2026 — 10,423 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,421 subscribers17 October 2026 — 10,419 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,417 subscribers19 October 2026 — 10,416 subscribers20 October 2026 — 10,414 subscribers21 October 2026 — 10,409 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,398 subscribers23 October 2026 — 10,400 subscribers24 October 2026 — 10,398 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,396 subscribers26 October 2026 — 10,395 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,397 subscribers28 October 2026 — 10,391 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,392 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,388 subscribers31 October 2026 — 10,387 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,383 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,382 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,384 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,383 subscribers6 November 2026 — 10,375 subscribers8 November 2026 — 10,371 subscribers9 November 2026 — 10,367 subscribers7 August 20269 November 2026
56 measurements spanning 94 days, net -74. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,352–10,482 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 56
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 13:3510,367-4
8 Nov 2026, 08:0010,371-4
6 Nov 2026, 23:4010,375-8
4 Nov 2026, 21:2910,383-1
3 Nov 2026, 21:5910,384+2
2 Nov 2026, 21:4610,382-1
2 Nov 2026, 01:2010,383-4
31 Oct 2026, 22:1010,387-1
30 Oct 2026, 19:0810,388-4
29 Oct 2026, 16:5610,392+1
28 Oct 2026, 16:3610,391-6
27 Oct 2026, 16:0910,397+2
26 Oct 2026, 15:5010,395-1
25 Oct 2026, 16:4610,396-2
24 Oct 2026, 15:2010,398-2
23 Oct 2026, 17:1510,400+2
22 Oct 2026, 17:5910,398-11
21 Oct 2026, 11:2110,409-5
20 Oct 2026, 11:2910,414-2
19 Oct 2026, 12:0210,416first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 27 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 31 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
18
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
30s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,231 reactions across 29 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👎80536.1%
👍68930.9%
😁24110.8%
custom 52198190063278025821456.50%
❤1225.47%
custom 5255742984669908154793.54%
🔥693.09%
👀452.02%
👌200.896%
🤝90.403%
👏50.224%
🥰20.09%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,231 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 27 August 2025 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 30 we hold a reading for · 40%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @softwareengineervlog. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 31 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 August 2025 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 00:55 UTC≈5,360 views51 reactionsread 10 November 2026

Сейчас использую DeesSeek v4 Flash, на готовой кодовой базе решать стандартные таски из трекера - хватает выше крыши. В месяц менее 20$ трачу на один проект. В Claude уже не помню когда заходил. Не вижу какого-то профита от слова "совсем". Думаю, что легких моделей для кодинга будет все больше 👇👇👇

👍41👌6❤2🤝2

6 Aug 2026, 00:09 UTC≈2,970 views84 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @xor_journalVideo

Полезное: разраб сделал интерактивный мануал, который по шагам показывает, что происходит после нажатия Enter в адресной строке браузера. Внутри прям весь путь запроса: от интерпретации ввода и DNS до TLS, HTTP и рендеринга страницы. Всего 16 этапов и 124 подшага с анимациями и объяснениями. И да — всё на русском. Разбираемся 👌 @xor_journal

👍63🔥18❤3

5 Aug 2026, 05:37 UTC≈3,140 views78 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @soer_live

Ты ненастоящий программист! Это происходит снова и снова, и каждый раз одинаково. Я начал свою карьеру, когда уже были языки высокого уровня, но ООП еще только набирал обороты. Несмотря на то что новая парадигма быстор становилась мейнстримом и нужно было учиться новому, не утихали разговоры о том, что ООП никогда не заменит структурный подход, потому что «медленно», «сложно», «бессмысленно» и все «настоящие» програ…

👍74❤3👏1

27 Jul 2026, 09:30 UTC≈6,810 views48 reactionsread 10 November 2026

Внимание, скам! Появился бот который выдает себя за бота моего канала. Я НИЧЕГО ЧЕРЕЗ БОТОВ НИКОМУ НЕ ПРОДАЮ. Жалуйтесь на скам если вам прелитит предложение на скидку от бота в телеге.

😁22👍15👌8👀3

25 Jul 2026, 09:59 UTC≈5,680 views39 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

У Сбера есть интересный whitepaper где он описывает технологию разработки продукта с помощью агентных циклов. Можно сколько угодно не любить корпоратов, но игнорировать тренд, который формируется у нас на глазах - это просто глупо. Хотим мы этого или нет, но основой работы для инженеров - становится архитектура агентных циклов, умение выстраивать процессы, делать оценку качества, вносить и контролировать метрики ка…

👍19👎16❤2👌1👏1

25 Jul 2026, 01:06 UTC≈5,380 views91 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

Закончилась эпоха Недавно Дядюшка Боб (автор книг "Чистый код", "Чистая архитектура" и т.д.) заявил, что вообще не читает код, который пишет LLM, вместо этого он использует ограничения в виде автоматизированных тестов и других проверок. Подобных заявлений с каждым днем становится все больше и количество будет только расти. Можно возразить, мол "а как же качество?". На самом деле за последние два года качество генер…

👎39👍29👀10❤5custom 52557429846699081544custom 52198190063278025823🤝1

23 Jul 2026, 04:17 UTC≈5,710 views44 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Как же больно использовать API вызовы для Fable 5. Это стата из OpenCode Zen, у меня для ревью спеки используется Fable, а для написании спеки в части программных интерфейсов Kimi 2.7, на то чтобы Fable дал несколько замечаний улетает 4-5$ (по сути это один промпт). Другими словами - хочешь задать вопрос Fable плати 5$. Был бы я ИИ, зарабатывал бы на ответах в чате.

😁43❤1

20 Jul 2026, 23:04 UTC≈6,630 views31 reactionsread 10 November 2026

Для того чтобы погонять Fable 5, пришлось вернуть подписку на Клода. В целом чувствуется, что модель сильнее Opus 4.8 (это проявляется в мелких деталях, подробнее писал в ИИ-лаборатории нашего клуба), но глобально ничего не меняется. Но вот что меня поразило, так это мои ощущения от использования Claude Code: как же я отвык от human in the loop, сидеть и постоянно контролировать - это не мое. У меня сейчас для рабо…

👀17🔥6custom 52198190063278025826❤1custom 52557429846699081541

15 Jul 2026, 04:09 UTC≈7,220 views63 reactions1 Starread 10 November 2026

Отдельно хочу про "агентные циклы" (Loop Engineering) поговорить, этот термин ввел Андрей Карпаты в своих выступлениях. Это интересная механика, которую я примерно полгода назад пытался использовать в своем оркестраторе. Идея в том, чтобы не говорить ИИ, что делать конкретно, а вместо этого выстроить цикл постепенного написания и улучшения кода. Эдакий эволюционный подход. На самом деле все, кто серьезно занимаются …

👍45custom 52557429846699081547🔥6❤5

9 Jul 2026, 04:42 UTC≈7,000 views109 reactions5 Starsread 29 August 2026

ИИ должен был помочь людям выполнять их работу лучше, а вместо этого приводит к усталости и выгоранию. Очень хорошо прочувствовал эту проблему на себе. Работаю с ИИ каждый день: формирую пул заданий, загоняю в оркестратор (это моя агентная система), через несколько часов проверяю сделанное, собираю список правок, снова запускаю агентную систему - и так по кругу. Проблема в том, что циклов исправления очень много. П…

👍67❤24custom 52198190063278025827🔥4👀3👌3😁1

4 Jul 2026, 01:22 UTC≈5,670 views22 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @tired_glebmikheevPhoto

А как у вас обстоят дела с агентами? Привет, испугался? Не бойся, я друг! Потрать пять минут, пройди опросник и расскажи про свое отношение, опыт и эффект от использования агентов. И поделись со своими друзьями, пусть они тоже прокликают. Я хочу собрать картинку, как покажет статус внедрения агентных практик в индустрии. С одной стороны когда ты общаешься с друзьями, кажется — ну вот оно, всё. Будущее безвозвратно …

👎13👍6custom 52557429846699081542🔥1

4 Jul 2026, 00:34 UTC≈5,080 views12 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @soer_live

Говорить, что ИИ заменит человека, так же как говорить, что калькулятор заменит математика Суть метафоры понятна, но ирония в том, что сама метафора подтверждает мысль, что придется конкурировать с ИИ на уровне кода, но не архитектуры. 1. Математик не конкурирует с калькулятором, просто потому что математик - это скорее архитектор, а не кодер. Он работает с теоремами, абстракциями, доказательствами, а не считает, ч…

👍12

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @softwareengineervlog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Oct 2025, 00:15 UTCAnonymous Poll1,130 voters approx.

Сколько токенов в сутки потребляют ваши ИИ агенты?

  1. Не использую агентов67%
  2. До 10 млн. токенов19%
  3. 10-30 млн. токенов5%
  4. 30-60 млн. токенов2%
  5. 60-120 млн. токенов1%
  6. Более 120 млн. токенов7%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 27 August 2025 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Alek OS
@Alek_OS · 32,292
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
Диджитализируй!
@t0digital · 28,616
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
The ExtremeCode Times
@extremecode · 35,840
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
Владилен: IT в эпоху AI
@vladm · 39,317
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 30 August 2026
Digital Ниндзя
@digital_ninjaa · 41,032
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“S0ER” (@softwareengineervlog), 10,367 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/softwareengineervlog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.