2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 143–145 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 21:16
144
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:05
144
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 8 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
62.5%
avg views ÷ 144 subscribers
Avg views / post
90.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
12.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 July 2026
Posts held
13 (8 April 2026 – 15 July 2026)
Views total
90
Reactions total
11
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 21:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
127
Videos
31
Links
80
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
50s
Average length
50s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
112 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
36
32.1%
😁
31
27.7%
👍
17
15.2%
❤
8
7.14%
🤣
8
7.14%
😢
6
5.36%
👏
2
1.79%
💯
2
1.79%
🤩
2
1.79%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 8 April 2026 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 13 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @chakandrey. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 April 2026 to 15 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Вот есть же такая тема, что после 35+ у мужчин появляется необъяснимое желание
начать бегать марафоны (может даже триатлон), взять себе мотик или ниву, обзавестись гаражом, или даже найти старую избушку в деревне и начать её восстанавливать... ну и так далее по списку
А вот у меня появилось огромное желание начать косить траву))) Обычной ручной косой.
Просыпаешься в 5 утра пораньше такой бодренький (Коси, коса, пока…
Надо бы повторить: айтишник подключил фитнес-браслет к календарю и с помощью ИИ вычислил, кто из коллег вызывает у него больше всего стресса 🤬
Fable 5 сопоставила пульс с созвонами и участниками встреч. После небольшого анализа у гения появился полноценный рейтинг коллег по уровню наносимого психологического урона.
В топе оказались… продакты 🤣
@xor_journal
Сегодня был первый опыт работы в ГЭК (государственная экзаменационная комиссия).
Теперь буду членом комиссии для бакалавров и магистров по направлению «информационные системы и технологии» во владимирском Вузе
Забавно было наблюдать как бакалавры делают вид, что реализацию проекта делали сами, без ИИ))
p.s. зацените какая актуальная тема диплома на фото))
Собеседование дизайнеров
Принято считать, что у дизайнеров (UI/UX) главное – это портофолио.
Мол, по нему можно понять уровень человека.
Да фиг там! Меня портфолио наоборот только путает. Никто же не говорит, сколько времени и сколько правок было за той или иной работой. Один дизайнер это делает с первой попытки, а другой на первую попытку потратит x3 времени, да еще и потом будет 5 кругов правок от ЛПР, чтобы полу…
Сегодня выступал с лекцией «Без названия» перед магистрантами своей кафедры, где я сам когда-то сидел и учился.
Пригласили замотивировать учиться, а то сейчас люди не очень понимают и ценят зачем нужно высшее техническое образование.
Раскручивал интересную историю, как создатель нашей кафедры Костров А.В. закладывал идею, что большой набор разнообразных дисциплин пригодится в будущем в менеджменте на руководящей до…
Вечером 22 мая — следствие ведут инженеры!
Записывайтесь на новый Vladimir Tech Talks, где:
• Данила Елисеев расскажет, куда катится DevOps и как нейронки могут поменять ваше отношение к методологии.
• Александр Галян поделится, как злоумышленники могут использовать слишком добрые p2p- и b2c-сервисы и что с этим делать.
• Андрей Кузнецов, Анастасия Чиркова, Елена Вершинина и Павел Головкин поднимут животрепещущую…
Есть такой ютуб-канал «Послезавтра». Если кратко, то он об устройстве этого мира: про страны, компании, политику, ресурсы. Друзья знают, как я его рекомендую))
Так вот, сегодня были в Нижнем Новгороде на лекции Николая Дубинина на тему как «НЕискусственный интеллект: как сделать интересно».
Это про то, как развиваться, как найти свой интерес и применить его в работе. Я забрал пачку советов по усилению своих докладо…
В интернете поняли как можно не платить за подписку на нейросети.
Большинство ИИ служб поддержки работают на тех же нейросетях - теперь, кодеры на западе работают с помощью поддержки Макдональдса.
Август 2023
🟣 В команде фронта берем подписку на ChatGPT за 20$/месяц
Понимаем, что AI неплохо справляется с написанием функций в коде. Хороший помощник и опора в сложных местах
Середина 2024
🟣 Узнаем об bolt.new. Покупаем. Первый вау-эффект. Будущее наступает.
Начинаю транслировать в команде, что за AI будущее. Работа изменится.
Кто-то в это верит и начинает сам использовать AI в работе, кто-то относится скептическ…
🔥3😢1
Signed Andrey Kuznetsov
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @chakandrey. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Логотип потом нарисуем” (@chakandrey), 144 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chakandrey.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
