Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 6 days, net -188. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 106,486–106,740 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 11:38
106,515
-74
11 Aug 2026, 08:17
106,589
-29
10 Aug 2026, 07:36
106,618
-68
9 Aug 2026, 07:11
106,686
-21
8 Aug 2026, 07:10
106,707
-4
7 Aug 2026, 04:30
106,711
+33
6 Aug 2026, 07:40
106,678
-25
6 Aug 2026, 02:00
106,703
no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:52
106,703
first reading
Engagement
88 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.7%
avg views ÷ 106,515 subscribers
Avg views / post
19,900
88 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
88
of 88 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
88 (3 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
1,753,990
Reactions total
55,813
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,100
Videos
≈6,150
Links
≈1,440
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 10m
Average length
1m 52s
Measured directly from 38 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
46,355 reactions across 76 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
11,404
24.6%
💯
7,765
16.8%
👍
6,711
14.5%
🔥
4,346
9.38%
❤
3,961
8.54%
🤯
3,465
7.47%
🙏
2,967
6.40%
👎
2,926
6.31%
🫡
977
2.11%
😢
348
0.751%
🤔
348
0.751%
🤝
289
0.623%
🎉
255
0.55%
🤩
124
0.268%
👏
116
0.25%
🏆
105
0.227%
🕊
85
0.183%
😐
66
0.142%
⚡
33
0.071%
🥰
25
0.054%
5 further kinds
39
0.084%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 88 of the 88 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55,813reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 88 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
45
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 88 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
16
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wrusss. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 88 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Сегодня, 12 августа, исполняется 26 лет со дня трагической гибели атомного подводного крейсера «Курск»
Эта дата навсегда останется одной из самых скорбных страниц в истории нашей страны и Северного флота.
В 11 часов 28 минут 118 жизней оборвались в Баренцевом море. Домой не вернулись мужественные моряки-подводники, для которых долг и присяга были превыше всего. Спустя годы память о них жива в сердцах миллионов росс…
Наш боец..(50+)
На фронте их называют СТАРЫЙ или ДЕД..
Замокрил троих фашистов!!
Как говорит брат ТАЙСКИЙ,хорошо обучил бойца- он хорош в бою!!!!
Не 5 дней и в мясо… учить надо тактике и медицине!!
Быть добру!!
Победа будет ZA нами!!
В день ВВС хочется вспомнить героев России летчиков ЧВК Вагнер.
Канамат Хусеевич Боташев — советский и российский военный лётчик, военный лётчик-снайпер, генерал-майор (2008, с 2013 года — в запасе), лётчик-штурмовик ЧВК «Вагнер». Погиб 22 мая 2022 года выполняя боевую задачу в Попасной.
В тот день Боташев выполнял боевой вылет на штурмовике Су-25. К тому моменту он уже несколько месяцев участвовал в специальной вое…
Пару дней назад МИД снова выразил свою приверженность анкориджским договоренностям, даже после того, как над ними открыто поглумились даже в США. Почему? Других идей и договоренностей нет. А разрастания хаоса войны в МИД и других структурах не хотят, не готовы они к такого уровня угрозам и сражениям. Это же надо на зубах, терпеть, верить, драться. А зачем драться тем, кто выиграл драку в 1991 году и получил все, о ч…
⚡️ В Омске арестовали офис семьи депутата Госдумы
Приставы наложили арест на здание по улице 60 лет Победы, 8 в Кировском округе. В нем располагаются офисы компаний, связанных с семьей предпринимателей Антропенко, — в том числе АО «Основа Холдинг» и ООО «Строительные материалы Сибири».
Поводом для ареста имущества послужил долг АО «Основа Холдинг» в размере 432 млн рублей. Эту сумму компания задолжала АО «Улан‑Удэ …
14 августа клуб Ермак проводит мероприятие в поддержку бойцов СВО. В 17.00.
г.Омск Ребятишки поучаствуют в эстафете, поразбирают АК, поучатся первой медицине ( жгуты, итп), и конечно военная каша. Ждем всех друзей, поддержите, поучаствуйте своим присутствием!
Алексей Верещагин: большевики предали русского солдата
Долгие десятилетия коммунистическая власть старалась не вспоминать о Первой мировой войне. Но в День памяти российских воинов, погибших в Первой мировой войне, командир Добровольческой разведывательно-штурмовой бригады имени Святого благоверного князя Александра Невского, член ЛДПР Алексей Верещагин вновь напомнил о подвиге погибших за Русский мир солдат.
В 191…
⚠️❗ ПОМОГИТЕ! ❗⚠️ МАЛЬЧИК В БЕДЕ
Как такой пёс оказался в смертельном отлове?!?
Снова печально известный Оренбург. Привезли мальчика алабая с невыносимой печалью в глазах…
Красивый, верный, ухоженный — и теперь он сидит за решёткой среди лая, жары и страха, ждёт того, кто его так хладнокровно сдал.
И самое страшное — когда подходит человек, он начинает вилять хвостом. Будто всё ещё верит, что за ним пришли.
Пожалуйст…
❗️ Добрый день, друзья.
Вика , наш ангел, передает привет всем воинам, защитникам земли Русской.❤️❗️
❤529👎107🙏86👍17😁16🫡8🤗7🕊4
Showing the 12 most recent of 88 posts we hold for @wrusss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 24,469 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Михаил Фёдорович Маваши @mikhailmavashi · 240,517 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Крепкое слово 👊” (@wrusss), 106,515 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wrusss.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
