Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Аксютенко Life

Channel

Аксютенко Life

@aksutenko

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,481subscribers

+293 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001455180738
TypeChannel
Username@aksutenko
DescriptionДобро пожаловать, уважаемые подписчики! Содержание канала - мое личное субъективное мнение по поводу происходящих событий. Также с удовольствием делюсь с Вами тем, что я считаю важным и интересным. [email protected] для связи
Created6 October 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/aksutenko

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@aksutenko/10943 · this entry2 Nov 2026, 07:51 UTC@krastelega/202812 Nov 2026, 08:04 UTC1.0013 minutes
@krastelega/203316 Nov 2026, 10:44 UTC@aksutenko/10997 · this entry6 Nov 2026, 13:12 UTC1.002.5 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@krastelega15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0026 minutesthis entry (11–4)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 109 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

7,1887,5167,3526 August 2026 — 7,188 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,188 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,198 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,210 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,216 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,233 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,250 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,257 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,283 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,284 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,318 subscribers5 September 2026 — 7,334 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,336 subscribers15 September 2026 — 7,349 subscribers19 September 2026 — 7,407 subscribers29 September 2026 — 7,433 subscribers6 October 2026 — 7,458 subscribers13 October 2026 — 7,468 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,474 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,487 subscribers22 October 2026 — 7,477 subscribers25 October 2026 — 7,484 subscribers28 October 2026 — 7,488 subscribers31 October 2026 — 7,495 subscribers3 November 2026 — 7,493 subscribers6 November 2026 — 7,516 subscribers9 November 2026 — 7,481 subscribers7,4816 August 20269 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 95 days, net +293. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,139–7,565 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 14:107,481-35
6 Nov 2026, 12:577,516+23
3 Nov 2026, 07:197,493-2
31 Oct 2026, 13:467,495+7
28 Oct 2026, 11:067,488+4
25 Oct 2026, 03:387,484+7
22 Oct 2026, 02:497,477-10
18 Oct 2026, 14:057,487+13
15 Oct 2026, 22:457,474+6
13 Oct 2026, 02:067,468+10
6 Oct 2026, 07:567,458+25
29 Sept 2026, 08:207,433+26
19 Sept 2026, 08:407,407+58
15 Sept 2026, 03:197,349+13
11 Sept 2026, 03:357,336+2
5 Sept 2026, 22:387,334+16
1 Sept 2026, 12:537,318+34
29 Aug 2026, 11:257,284+1
26 Aug 2026, 01:597,283+26
22 Aug 2026, 18:377,257first reading

Engagement

213 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.5%
avg views ÷ 7,481 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,690
114 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
114
of 213 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 85 of 114 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held213 (4 August 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total192,099
Reactions total1,994
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 17:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,210
Videos
≈1,370
Links
≈2,420

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 24m
Average length
2m 17s

Measured directly from 37 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,479 reactions across 132 posts, in 45 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯92926.7%
👍46813.5%
🤬3369.66%
🤣2858.19%
❤2647.59%
🔥2567.36%
😁1664.77%
😱1183.39%
🤯922.64%
🤡651.87%
😭641.84%
🙈621.78%
👏601.72%
⚡511.47%
😢391.12%
🤔290.834%
👀230.661%
😡200.575%
✍180.517%
🤝170.489%
25 further kinds1173.36%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 159 of the 213 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,841 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 213 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 114 posts held from the last 30 days (6.14%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 08:42 UTC≈1,300 views31 reactionsread 13 November 2026

⚡️Как сообщают мои подписчики в Эвенкии силовики нагрянули в районую администрацию. Изъяли документы, серверы, компьютеры. У некоторых сотрудников даже мобильные телефоны. В п. Тура арестован первый заместитель главы Эвенкийского района Игорь Огольцов. Его кабинет опечатан. Весь поселок и округ бурлит. Паника среди сотрудников администрации.

🤝12❤7👀5🎉3👏2💯1🔥1

13 Nov 2026, 06:11 UTC≈1,420 views18 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

Дмитрий Иванов активист партии «Зеленые» продолжает рассказывать о полигонах в Советском районе Красноярска. На этот раз речь пойдет о полигоне Русала.

👍7🤬6🤯4💯1

13 Nov 2026, 05:32 UTC≈1,390 views16 reactionsread 13 November 2026

А правда. Чего это жителям не скинутся на дороги? Хорошую идею предложил глава Канска, жителям Красноярска давно пора скинутся на метро. На «Гелик» начальнику регоператора Шепелеву же уже скинулись. И на метро скинемся. Так и будем скидываться.

🤬10❤2👍2💯2

13 Nov 2026, 04:05 UTC≈1,460 views33 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

А это видео из Боготола. Тоже все очень доходчиво объясняют люди. Может поэтому краевые чиновники не хотят «тратить свое драгоценное время» на встречу с медиками и жителями края, а обсуждают уничтожение краевой медицины с послушными депутатами и безинициативными местными чиновниками?

💯19🤬6⚡4😭4

13 Nov 2026, 04:00 UTC≈2,830 views49 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

Пока зампред краевого правительства Миронова, депутат Зайцев и министр здравоохранения Коноваленко рассказывают как будут отлично работать объединенные медицинские учреждения, медики рассказывают реальную ситуацию. Миронова говорит что скорые будут успевать довозить пациентов из Боготола или Шарыпово в Ачинск. А водители скорых рассказывают о том, что реально происходит. Если мы будем молчать эти двоечники уничтожат…

💯30😭9🤬6❤2🤯2

13 Nov 2026, 02:43 UTC≈1,400 views87 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @Deputat_Dukov

УБИТ чиновниками… В Боготоле умер человек, которому без преувеличения в поклоне ВЕСЬ Боготол и прилегающие районы. . Владислав Викторович Рудько. Он более 40 лет заведовал хирургическим отделением местной Железнодорожной больницы. Активно и плодотворно работал и многие годы после выхода на пенсию , ибо был крепкий , ответственный и волевой мужик в свои за 80. Желудочное кровотечение, врач прибывшей «Скорой»предлож…

😭46😢16🤬12❤6💯3💔1🔥1🤯1

13 Nov 2026, 02:42 UTC≈1,480 views7 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

Интересно, это благоустройство еще по-Логиновски, или уже по-Верещагински?

🔥3🏆2💯1🤯1

12 Nov 2026, 12:13 UTC≈3,050 views20 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Какая интересная новость. А куда же смотрела Тамара Владимировна Берлинец — почётный работник среднего профессионального образования, заслуженный педагог Красноярского края, член общероссийской политической партии «Единая Россия», депутат Канского городского Совета депутатов? Неужели не знала о таких нарушениях? Или эти деньги тоже на выборы собирали?

😁9💯4👏3🔥3😈1

Showing the 12 most recent of 213 posts we hold for @aksutenko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 5 posts on @aksutenko as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
10 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
48 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Nov 2026, 03:36 UTCAnonymous Poll330 voters

Кому собирал деньги Владислав Логинов?

  1. Себе и только себе24%
  2. Партии и только партии6%
  3. Себе и немножко партии40%
  4. Партии и немножко себе30%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Nov 2026, 05:43 UTCAnonymous Poll909 voters

Ваша зарплата…

  1. Ниже «средней по региону»30%
  2. «Средняя» по региону45%
  3. Гораздо выше «средней» по региону25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 213 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 71 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Да! Терехов
@daterekhov · 20,099
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 September 2026
Алюминиевые огурцы
@aluminievie · 38,056
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 31 August 2026
Михаил Котюков
@mkotyukov · 48,648
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026
Бал дебютанток
@baldebut · 23,223
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 September 2026
NGS24.RU — Новости Красноярска
@ngs24_krsk · 62,889
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
Восьмой канал Z
@kanal8_krsk · 44,697
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
Проспект Мира
@prmira_news · 22,537
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 September 2026
Kras Mash
@kras_mash · 49,715
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026
Борус. Люди
@borus_people · 20,258
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 September 2026
ПУЛЬС Красноярья
@pulse24 · 22,327
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 September 2026
ТВК
@tvknew · 54,744
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
Короче, Красноярск
@krskkoroche · 30,887
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 5 September 2026
Новости Красноярска
@novosti_krsk · 31,363
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
Борус
@borusio · 67,477
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
Красноярск №1
@krsk01 · 23,143
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 September 2026
Страна возможностей
@strana_vozmozhnostei · 24,323
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Аксютенко Life” (@aksutenko), 7,481 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aksutenko.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.