Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Батальон "ШРАМА" 204 полк СпН "АХМАТ"

Channel

Батальон "ШРАМА" 204 полк СпН "АХМАТ"

@specnazahmat

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

167,258subscribers

+301 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001996799777
TypeChannel
Username@specnazahmat
DescriptionБатальон "ШРАМА" 204 полк СпН "АХМАТ" МО РФ, ЛНР
Created30 October 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held36
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/specnazahmat

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

149,000 average views per post against 167,258 subscribers — an engagement rate of 89.1%. Across the 2,425 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,015–316,163 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.33% and 21.3%, with a median of 9.90%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (27 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Posts measured57 of 57 published in the window (0 exact, 57 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled8,499,000
Mature posts only89.8% over 55 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers167,258 measured 26 September 2026
Cohortb100000:rus · 2,425 channels · p10 2.00% · p25 4.33% · p50 9.90% · p75 21.3% · p90 36.1%
Position in cohort99.505th percentile · 9.0× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.174% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 26 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

158,922167,258163,0906 August 2026 — 166,957 subscribers6 August 2026 — 166,957 subscribers6 August 2026 — 167,063 subscribers7 August 2026 — 167,115 subscribers8 August 2026 — 166,936 subscribers9 August 2026 — 167,135 subscribers10 August 2026 — 167,072 subscribers11 August 2026 — 167,023 subscribers12 August 2026 — 167,113 subscribers13 August 2026 — 167,068 subscribers14 August 2026 — 167,052 subscribers16 August 2026 — 167,043 subscribers17 August 2026 — 167,025 subscribers18 August 2026 — 167,172 subscribers19 August 2026 — 167,039 subscribers20 August 2026 — 167,111 subscribers22 August 2026 — 167,049 subscribers24 August 2026 — 167,090 subscribers25 August 2026 — 166,875 subscribers26 August 2026 — 166,906 subscribers27 August 2026 — 167,045 subscribers28 August 2026 — 166,972 subscribers29 August 2026 — 166,926 subscribers30 August 2026 — 167,057 subscribers31 August 2026 — 166,890 subscribers1 September 2026 — 158,922 subscribers2 September 2026 — 160,003 subscribers3 September 2026 — 166,661 subscribers5 September 2026 — 167,158 subscribers8 September 2026 — 167,093 subscribers11 September 2026 — 167,053 subscribers13 September 2026 — 167,059 subscribers15 September 2026 — 167,079 subscribers16 September 2026 — 167,046 subscribers19 September 2026 — 167,162 subscribers26 September 2026 — 167,258 subscribers6 August 202626 September 2026
36 measurements spanning 51 days, net +301. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 157,672–168,508 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 08:37167,258+96
19 Sept 2026, 07:19167,162+116
16 Sept 2026, 18:40167,046-33
15 Sept 2026, 00:01167,079+20
13 Sept 2026, 06:15167,059+6
11 Sept 2026, 11:56167,053-40
8 Sept 2026, 17:21167,093-65
5 Sept 2026, 10:01167,158+497
3 Sept 2026, 16:39166,661+6,658
2 Sept 2026, 05:45160,003+1,081
1 Sept 2026, 03:25158,922-7,968
31 Aug 2026, 04:05166,890-167
30 Aug 2026, 04:58167,057+131
29 Aug 2026, 06:07166,926-46
28 Aug 2026, 06:56166,972-73
27 Aug 2026, 09:47167,045+139
26 Aug 2026, 07:55166,906+31
25 Aug 2026, 06:11166,875-215
24 Aug 2026, 03:36167,090+41
22 Aug 2026, 08:57167,049first reading

Engagement

121 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
89.1%
avg views ÷ 167,258 subscribers
Avg views / post
149,000
57 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
57
of 121 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held121 (26 July 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total8,499,000
Reactions total409,188
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Sept 2026, 20:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈70
Videos
≈2,150
Links
≈2,150

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3h 15m
Average length
1m 42s

Measured directly from 115 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

951,761 reactions across 118 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍187,96819.7%
🙏187,74419.7%
🔥154,29716.2%
🫡112,37411.8%
👏85,9789.03%
⚡82,3848.66%
❤80,7378.48%
🕊16,3251.72%
🎉13,7641.45%
😍10,6781.12%
🥰6,7420.708%
❤‍🔥6,4040.673%
💯3,5730.375%
😢1,1150.117%
😱1,1040.116%
😁5420.057%
😭190.002%
🤣100.001%
😘30%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 121 of the 121 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 977,730 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 121 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 14:59 UTC≈141,000 views8,125 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

🔴 Продолжаем рубрику «ФРОНТОВАЯ ЖИЗНЬ НАШИХ РЕБЯТ». Недавно на нашем канале мы рассказывали о пополнении в батальоне «ШРАМА» Спецназа «АХМАТ» МО РФ, в роту огневой поддержки поступило третье орудие — гаубица Д‑30. Гаубичный расчёт уже сформирован. Сегодня командир ШРАМ расскажет, как идёт обустройство позиции для артиллеристов под орудие Д‑30. Уже начались инженерные работы. Плотное покрывало густой «зелёнки» игра…

🔥1,880🙏1,430👍1,370🫡1,090👏1,030❤744⚡581

26 Sept 2026, 07:00 UTC≈94,000 views7,341 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

☄️🔹☄️ Краснолиманское направление, ДНР. В поле зрения нашей воздушной ⭐️ разведки в лесополосе в объектив попал «укроп», наводящий суету в кустах, в густой «зелёнке». Там же рядом находилось и логово, оборудованное под пункт управления БпЛА ВСУ (ПУ БпЛА). Место дислокации ВСУшника мгновенно передали расчёту ударных дронов самолётного типа с неподвижным крылом «Молния» ☄️ батальона «ШРАМА» Спецназа «АХМАТ» МО РФ. …

🔥2,150🙏1,400👍1,350🫡1,070⚡833❤536👏2

25 Sept 2026, 14:59 UTC≈136,000 views8,501 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

🎖Продолжаем рубрику «НАГРАЖДЕНИЕ ОТЛИЧИВШИХСЯ БОЙЦОВ СПЕЦНАЗА «АХМАТ»🎖 Сегодня чествуем отличившихся бойцов нашего батальона «ШРАМА» Спецназа «АХМАТ» МО РФ, которые служили верой и правдой и сейчас находятся на заслуженном отдыхе, а также тех бойцов, которые получили тяжёлые ранения и сейчас восстанавливаются в госпиталях. Каждый из них с честью выдержал испытания, стойко противостоял врагу и шаг за шагом приближал …

👍1,430🙏1,390🔥1,350🫡1,100🎉1,090😍1,090👏1,040❤9

25 Sept 2026, 06:59 UTC≈133,000 views9,403 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

☄️🔹☄️ Краснолиманское направление, ДНР. В ходе аэроразведки ⭐️ в густой «зелёнке» были выявлены вражеские укрытия, пункты управления беспилотными летательными аппаратами (ПУ БпЛА), а также различные антенны, обеспечивающие бесперебойную работу FPV-дронов. Как бы противник ни маскировался, от глаз нашей разведки ему не скрыться. Согласно полученным координатам по «квадрату» цели отработал один из гаубичных расчётов …

⚡2,550🔥1,650👍1,250🙏1,250👏1,030🫡929❤743😭1

24 Sept 2026, 15:03 UTC≈127,000 views6,033 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

🔴🔴🔴 Работа бойцов роты противодронной борьбы батальона «ШРАМА» Спецназа «АХМАТ» МО РФ в борьбе с вражескими дронами ⭐️🛸. Показываем только те экспонаты, которые более менее сохранились. То, что не уцелело, сдетонировало — от этих трофеев ничего не осталось. Среди захваченных образцов — FPV-дроны и БпЛА «Мавик 3 Про». Этот аппарат был сбит стрелковым оружием. Он оснащён двойными батареями и пострадал незначительно,…

🙏1,420👍1,390🫡1,090⚡810🔥739❤584

24 Sept 2026, 07:03 UTC≈139,000 views7,383 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

☄️🔹☄️ Краснолиманское направление, ДНР. Ночью, когда боевые действия становятся менее активными, наши оппоненты зачастую ожидают доставку провизии и боеприпасов. И вот ночью в поле зрения нашей воздушной разведки ⭐️ попал вражеский гексакоптер типа «Баба Яга»🛸, который осуществлял доставку провизии и БК на позицию противника. Проследив за ним, аэроразведка выявила важный объект ВСУ — опорный пункт с блиндажами, обо…

🙏3,130👍1,440🫡1,100❤637⚡590🔥486

23 Sept 2026, 15:13 UTC≈164,000 views6,194 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

🕯В ПАМЯТЬ О ПОГИБШЕМ БОЕВОМ ТОВАРИЩЕ С ПОЗЫВНЫМ ЗЕНИТ🕯 С чувством невосполнимой утраты мы прощаемся с нашим боевым товарищем, верным другом, героем и настоящим патриотом своей Родины — Игорем Быстровым с позывным ЗЕНИТ. Игорь нёс службу в роте противодронной борьбы батальона «ШРАМА» Спецназа «АХМАТ» Министерства обороны Российской Федерации. Приехал из Санкт‑Петербурга. ЗЕНИТ отличался отличной физической подготов…

🙏1,790😢1,110🕊1,100🫡1,100❤1,090⚡2🤣1😱1

23 Sept 2026, 07:01 UTC≈98,000 views7,375 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Forwarded from @AptiAlaudinovAKHMATVideo

Уничтожение средств связи и пункта управления БпЛА с живой силой противника. Батальон Шрама спецназа "АХМАТ" МО РФ. Telegram | ВКонтакте | RuTube | Мах АХМАТ СИЛА — РОССИЯ МОЩЬ БОГ ЕДИН — АЛЛАХУ АКБАР!

👏2,100👍1,420🙏1,390🔥1,360🫡1,100❤4⚡1

22 Sept 2026, 15:18 UTC≈145,000 views7,424 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

✨ Продолжаем рубрику «ФРОНТОВАЯ ЖИЗНЬ НАШИХ РЕБЯТ». Представляем вашему вниманию второй блиндаж артиллеристов роты огневого поражения батальона «ШРАМА» Спецназа «АХМАТ» МО РФ. Так выглядит вход в блиндаж — здесь максимально соблюдён режим маскировки. Блиндаж небольшой, из‑за болотистой местности невозможно выкопать его глубже, чтобы человек мог стоять в полный рост. Как и на всех позициях наших бойцов, здесь царя…

🙏1,470👍1,360🔥1,350❤1,110🫡1,090👏1,040😍2⚡1

22 Sept 2026, 07:01 UTC≈157,000 views7,687 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

☄️🔹☄️ Краснолиманское направление, ДНР. В ходе воздушной разведки ⭐️ были выявлены вражеские объекты, патч-антенны для работы фпв-дронов и пункт управления беспилотными летательными аппаратами (ПУ БпЛА). По полученным координатам отработал один из гаубичных расчёт Д‑30 роты огневой поддержки батальона «ШРАМА» Спецназа «АХМАТ» МО РФ. В результате вражеские позиции были накрыты плотным огнём. Продолжаем методично вы…

🔥1,950👍1,770🙏1,430🫡1,100👏1,040⚡397

21 Sept 2026, 14:59 UTC≈138,000 views7,415 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

🔴 Результаты работы роты противодронной борьбы батальона «ШРАМА» Спецназа «АХМАТ» МО РФ. Наши бойцы противодронщики принудительно посадили вражеский ударный БпЛА самолётного типа Hornet («Хорнет»). Дрон был сбит стрелковым оружием. При падении он получил повреждения, но в целом его облик сохранился. Этот беспилотник оснащён двумя камерами: одна направлена вперёд, вторая расположена снизу — так обеспечивается видеоф…

👍1,440🙏1,380🔥1,360💯1,100🫡1,090👏1,040❤3⚡2

21 Sept 2026, 07:29 UTC≈108,000 views6,327 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

☄️🔹☄️ Населённый пункт Красный Лиман, ДНР. В ходе воздушной разведки ⭐️ были выявлены вражеские объекты: патч-антенны для работы фпв-дронов установленные на деревьях и пункты управления беспилотными летательными аппаратами (ПУ БпЛА), размещённые в частном домостроении, а также в многоэтажных домах мирных граждан. Координаты целей оперативно передали расчётам ударных фпв‑дронов ⭐️ роты БпЛА батальона «ШРАМА» Спецназ…

👍1,440🙏1,380🔥1,360🫡1,090👏1,050❤4⚡3

Showing the 12 most recent of 121 posts we hold for @specnazahmat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@specnazahmat edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 September 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Батальон "ШРАМА" 204 полк СпН "АХМАТ"” (@specnazahmat), 167,258 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/specnazahmat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.