І чому я не здивований...

Channel
✙ Твій кореш з 28 ОМБр ✙
@ombr28
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
327subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001620998453 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ombr28 |
| Description | Щоденник бійця легендарної Лицарської бригади. Волею та Залізом! |
| Created | 23 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ombr28 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:19 | 327 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:41 | 327 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 36.7%
- avg views ÷ 327 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 120
- 18 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.08%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 18
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (18 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,158 |
| Reactions total | 14 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 07:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 546
- Videos
- 330
- Links
- 144
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1m 34s
- Average length
- 31s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
14 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 21.4% | |
| 🤬 | 3 | 21.4% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 14.3% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 14.3% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 14.3% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 7.14% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 7.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
‼️«Нещодавно затримали вже другого за цей місяць підора-мігранта, який зливав русні координати в Одеському районі. Вони зараз охуїли: логістика встала, і вся падаль, що працювала в порту та на кораблях, шукає, де заробити. Інформацію зливав філіппінець.» — Джерело в силовому блоці Радикальня 🆙 Пiдписатись
🤬3
Ну что то новенькое…. Приколы от 404й
😂😂😂
🤣1
Ну а насправді це Валерій Федорович сказав, щоб трохи поглумитися над Зе. У мене таке відчуття, що Санич його просто жорстко ненавидить. Ніби ти у своєму дворі посварився з якимось піздюком, який на 3 роки молодший за тебе, а потім у бійці йому програв. І він ходить по двору, ще й з твоїми друзяками спілкується, провокує, сука така. Але Федорич — красень, а Вован прям не вивозить.
😁1
З іншого боку, вступ до Альянсу означає остаточний вихід країни на світовий антиросійський фронт, що зобов’яже наших шановних партнерів не спостерігати з попкорном за кривавою бійнею, а брати в ній безпосередню участь. Хоча й тут нас наїбуть, я, як корінний одесит, знаю євреїв як свої п’ять пальців. А там усім керує саме Богом обраний народ. (Зелю вони своїм не вважають, якщо що, він гой)
Поки мене не було, Залужний знову виступив із потужною заявою щодо НАТО. З одного боку, стати країною-членом Альянсу було б добре, адже ми про це мріяли? Чи не так? Але з іншого... Наша нескінченна війна вивела нас в авангард військових технологій, дозволила розробити нові тактики в наступі й обороні, розставила пріоритети у застосуванні техніки й фактично породила СБС. Де все це в НАТО? А ще нагадаю, що сьогодні не …
💯2
Цілком і повністю згоден з думкою наших товаришів та колег по телеграму, єдине, що добавлю: Не потрібно недооцінювати противника, так, совок в їх головах дійсно дає нам фору, але ми нею не можемо скористатись через власну неорганізованість. Засоби у нас є, локації і позиції дійсно всі відомі, проте всі забули, що на С-400 та Іскандерах служать не мальчики мобіки, зауважте, що там сидить дорослий офіцер, котрий хоче…
👍2
Судячи з того, що ці підари вирішили рівняти з землею саме київські склади, недобитий руснявий генесрал дуже розлютився. Не допрацювали
❤3
Як же набридла ця війна між маркетплейсами
✍1
щось відбувається
❗2 ракети з Волині на Польщу. Підписатись 👉 🚀ППО | РАДАР
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ombr28. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“✙ Твій кореш з 28 ОМБр ✙” (@ombr28), 327 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ombr28.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.