Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for rvalue的生草日常

Channel

rvalue的生草日常

@rvalue_daily

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,802subscribers

+613 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001323083027
TypeChannel
Username@rvalue_daily
Description(可能位于火星的)大 草 原(? @rvalue_official 的个人channel 你以为是草图channel, 其实是日常channel哒!( 本channel可能包含以下内容: 迷惑图片/骨折游戏/过气车万/沙雕日常/文化课题目/高三碎碎念(已完结)/纸片人小姐姐 别问 问就是生草 消息无法保证真实性 深究请读者自行查证
Created23 March 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/rvalue_daily

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,1898,8028,495.56 August 2026 — 8,189 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,192 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,191 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,194 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,210 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,227 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,252 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,273 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,300 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,327 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,329 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,337 subscribers26 September 2026 — 8,436 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,532 subscribers11 October 2026 — 8,580 subscribers14 October 2026 — 8,592 subscribers17 October 2026 — 8,611 subscribers20 October 2026 — 8,630 subscribers23 October 2026 — 8,667 subscribers27 October 2026 — 8,692 subscribers29 October 2026 — 8,715 subscribers1 November 2026 — 8,729 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,745 subscribers7 November 2026 — 8,779 subscribers11 November 2026 — 8,802 subscribers6 August 202611 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 97 days, net +613. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,097–8,894 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 00:098,802+23
7 Nov 2026, 09:348,779+34
4 Nov 2026, 19:178,745+16
1 Nov 2026, 18:198,729+14
29 Oct 2026, 16:378,715+23
27 Oct 2026, 02:068,692+25
23 Oct 2026, 17:308,667+37
20 Oct 2026, 15:558,630+19
17 Oct 2026, 21:508,611+19
14 Oct 2026, 11:418,592+12
11 Oct 2026, 08:208,580+48
5 Oct 2026, 08:168,532+96
26 Sept 2026, 23:398,436+99
18 Sept 2026, 03:388,337+8
14 Sept 2026, 02:218,329+2
1 Sept 2026, 08:138,327+27
29 Aug 2026, 18:268,300+27
26 Aug 2026, 19:548,273+21
24 Aug 2026, 04:138,252+25
20 Aug 2026, 03:188,227first reading

Engagement

67 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
53.2%
avg views ÷ 8,802 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,680
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 67 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held67 (9 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total117,060
Reactions total1,637
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 00:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,560
Videos
≈21
Links
≈212

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
22s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,952 reactions across 66 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1,65233.4%
🤣95319.2%
🥰3837.73%
🤡3026.10%
🌚2304.64%
😭2264.56%
🍾1482.99%
🆒1382.79%
😇1322.67%
🔥1232.48%
😈1002.02%
💯901.82%
🤓761.53%
⚡711.43%
😱581.17%
😨531.07%
🤪420.848%
❤400.808%
👍390.788%
🤯290.586%
15 further kinds671.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 67 of the 67 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,013 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 25 posts held from the last 30 days (8.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 03:35 UTC≈1,910 views71 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤡45😁17❤4🤣2👍1🤪1😭1

9 Nov 2026, 08:42 UTC≈2,170 views112 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁73💯32🏆5⚡1❤1

5 Nov 2026, 12:44 UTC≈3,580 views65 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁63👍2

3 Nov 2026, 16:14 UTC≈4,720 views77 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁76❤1

2 Nov 2026, 10:16 UTC≈5,010 views73 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😇58🥰15

2 Nov 2026, 02:42 UTC≈4,610 views85 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁77🤪7👍1

30 Oct 2026, 03:15 UTC≈5,770 views81 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

跟你们安卓人说不下去 我们苹果人都是用这个玩舜葫的.png

🆒69👏4🔥4🤡2🤬1🤷‍♀1

29 Oct 2026, 10:18 UTC≈4,410 views67 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

big ∀/ is really watching you [src]

😱50🤓8🤬5😁3🥰1

29 Oct 2026, 06:06 UTC≈3,920 views26 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁26

28 Oct 2026, 07:53 UTC≈4,290 views84 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣72🥰10❤2

Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @rvalue_daily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

每日无数猫
@miaowu · 19,930
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 29 September 2026
简中互联网废物大赏
@fucku_idiot · 41,768
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 30 August 2026
赛博忏悔室
@cyber_confessional · 40,961
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 30 August 2026
Solidot
@solidot · 48,811
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 28 August 2026
LoopDNS资讯播报
@DNSPODT · 73,288
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 20 August 2026
看鉴中国 OutsightChina
@OutsightChina · 41,905
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 29 August 2026
【李老师不是你老师】官方电报
@lilaoshibushinilaoshi · 49,209
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 26 August 2026
树洞🌳群友问❓有点意思🗳
@qunyouwen · 89,030
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 17 August 2026
APPDO 数字生活指南
@AppDoDo · 40,980
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 30 August 2026
VPS信号旗播报
@vps_xhq · 50,835
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 26 August 2026
蓝点网订阅频道
@landiansub · 47,142
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 28 August 2026
「VoP」維尼之聲 - Voice of Pooh🔊
@VoiceofPooh · 22,167
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 20 September 2026
不靠谱的喵(>^ω^<) #CatGPT
@MlgmXyysd_bibilailai · 22,511
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 23 September 2026
Time经济观察
@TimeHorizonX · 21,056
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 25 September 2026
中国数字时代
@cdtchinesefeed · 51,932
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 29 August 2026
学习墙国🐸
@XueXi_China · 86,381
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 17 August 2026
Programmer Jokes
@programmerjokes · 105,971
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
獨立媒體 inmediahk.net
@inmediahknet · 38,558
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“rvalue的生草日常” (@rvalue_daily), 8,802 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rvalue_daily.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.