Channel
@lightrekt
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
49,973subscribers
-40 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001577508614 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lightrekt |
| Description | 重口视频看多了吧，换点轻口味的吧。不要喷血、不要脑袋爆炸的特写、不要看了吃不进饭、不要腐尸的图片，我们收藏一些老少皆宜的“轻量级重口”图片和视频。看这些有警醒意识，提醒人们要注意安全。 . /﹋\ (҂`_´) <,︻╦╤─ ҉ - - - - - - - (轻口味) _/﹋\_ 投稿机器人： @tolightrektbot 搜视频机器人： @pdaobot 防失联： @rektvids 哎有趣： @iyouqu |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lightrekt |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:55 | 49,973 | -9 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 49,982 | -13 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:58 | 49,995 | -20 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 50,015 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 50,012 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:00 | 50,020 | +7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 50,013 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 50,013 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 1 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
362 reactions across 18 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 131 | 36.2% | |
| 🌚 | 38 | 10.5% | |
| 🫡 | 36 | 9.94% | |
| 😁 | 31 | 8.56% | |
| 😱 | 26 | 7.18% | |
| 👏 | 24 | 6.63% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 4.97% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 4.14% | |
| 🤡 | 11 | 3.04% | |
| 🥰 | 11 | 3.04% | |
| 😎 | 9 | 2.49% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 0.829% | |
| 🆒 | 2 | 0.552% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 0.552% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 0.552% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 0.276% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.276% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 0.276% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 362reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 December 2025 to 2 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Жительница Канады и её собака чудом избежали нападения гризли. Женщина проявила исключительное самообладание когда огромный хищник проследовал и несколько раз нерешительно пытался подойти к ним на дорожке. Она не стала убегать, а начала произносить странные пугающие звуки и крики которые смутили медведя и заставили его уйти обратно в лес
❤8👍3🥴1
Ограбление. Украл рыбу
😁11❤2🔥2🦄2
Дорожно транспортное происшествие в Майами. Никто не погиб
❤16👀1
Во время прыжка с высоты 3500 метров парашютист потерял сознание. На высоте 250 метров от земли парашют автоматически раскрылся
😱16❤8
Драка в американской школе
🌚21❤10👍3😱2
Человек вёл интернет трансляцию и на короткое время показал свой кошелёк. В результате он потерял сто тысяч долларов
🤡11❤5👎3
Японский волейболист Юдзи Нисида на разминке случайно попал мячом в девушку. То как он извинился, не оставляет сомнений в его раскаянии
🫡12😁8❤4👍3
Драка в ресторане в США
😁12❤11🌚10🥰2😎2
Невероятное самообладание
👏22🥰8❤7🌚4🔥2
Неожиданно
😱8❤6🆒2👍1
Одного из террористов в Сиднее обезоружил обычный прохожий. Героя зовут Ахмад Эль Ахмед, он мусульманин, владеет фруктовой лавкой в Сиднее. Он отец двоих детей. Получил два пулевых ранения и доставлен в больницу. На данный момент уже прооперирован
🫡24❤12🤝2
Наиболее полное, на этот момент, видео теракта в Сиднее
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @lightrekt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 819,001 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“轻口味时间” (@lightrekt), 49,973 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lightrekt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.