脑扫描显示新冠患者广泛的结构和功能变化 2026-08-09 22:19 by 通灵师 四川大学的研究人员分析了 49 项脑成像研究,显示新冠患者的大脑经历了广泛的结构和功能变化。研究结果表明,新冠病毒会影响负责记忆、情绪和执行功能的区域,这或许可解释部分新冠患者出现的神经系统症状。对比新冠患者和健康人群的脑扫描结果,研究人员发现,负责决策和认知控制的额叶频繁显示结构性改变。参与感觉处理和注意力的区域颞叶和顶叶在病毒康复患者中显示出明显差异。前额叶皮层对社会心理压力高度敏感,这意味着疫情本身带来的压力,以及病毒感染,都可能导致前额叶的结构性改变。新冠患者的灰质总体积减少,外层皮质变薄,这种组织损失可能是由于感染期间氧气供应减少或严重免疫系统炎症所致。 https://academic.oup.com/cercor/article-abstract/36/3/bhag022/8539773?redirectedFrom=fu…

Channel
是芙莉莲
@iReallyHateTheWorld
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
67subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002423135063 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iReallyHateTheWorld |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iReallyHateTheWorld |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 67 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 67 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 25.0%
- avg views ÷ 67 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 16.7
- 18 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 18
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (6 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 301 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 01:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 872
- Videos
- 38
- Links
- 504
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
via 大意 from ibuki🏖🔭...
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
【原创调优脚本】Tcpfit — 单线程 186 → 401 Mbps,动态 TCP 调优,优化线路机器通用一键开源脚本 https://www.nodeseek.com/post-865242-1
一份周更的 Pi Agent 源码导读,阅读体验做得很不错,值得一读 (WIP, 现在只更新到第 2 章) https://books.antinomie.org/pi/
How the Earth rotates via 12d 🌙
Cloudflare 的 Managed Challenge 在前十小时内化解了 118 万次请求。即便如此,仍有数量惊人的中国僵尸网络成功绕过了该挑战。 所以我做了一件不该做的事:我在 Cloudflare 网络的边缘节点上封锁了整个中国。几天后,越南也开始出现一波相似的 Copycat 攻击,于是我也封锁了越南,接着是新加坡。 我的网站是一个美国博物馆捐赠者数据库,使用英文。我的真实搜索流量有 95.9% 来自美国,1.3% 来自加拿大。
虚假的vibe coding,打开codex,/goal 【一堆截图】 梦游般的语言描述需求 真实的vibe coding,开一个issue,丢一堆链接,你帮我干这个
看来镁光颗粒还是挺适合反向超频的 终于不会一打开Apex/VRChat玩一会就蓝屏了(
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @iReallyHateTheWorld. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@wtmsd · 115,7813 postsHAT's Public Channel |
@hatschannel · 2,4712 posts美图与沙雕
@acg_meme · 18,5791 postFREE 中文
@freechinese · 27,3041 postrvalue的生草日常
@rvalue_daily · 8,1911 post苍穹の下 @blueskyxnblog· SKY的🤡💦日常😅😅😅
@sky66666666666666666666666666666 · 5,2231 postSolidot
@solidot · 44,4031 post每日沙雕墙
@woshadiao · 115,2001 postzrj766的频道
@zrj96 · 16,7431 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“是芙莉莲” (@iReallyHateTheWorld), 67 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iReallyHateTheWorld.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.