今年我媳妇本命年,她说过的很苦。岳父几年确诊了肝癌,我媳妇在8月份又被电诈了10000。 其实啊,我也想说我过得也很苦,上班没存下来钱,各方方面面今年钱也没有了。明天还要去买岳父的丧葬品,后续还有我媳妇那边的白事。真的是,到处都是难处,实在不想在对媳妇倾诉了,她已经够累了。唉😔
👍8❤3🤔1

Channel
@chxpd
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
157,324subscribers
+6,380 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001874387876 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chxpd |
| Description | 匿名或带用户名投稿自己的秘密,忏悔,后悔,内心感触或过错行为等等,请勿投稿以下内容:字数太短,复制别人的帖子,编造,带节奏,色情,恐怖,个人身份信息等等,友情频道: @fa_dian 投稿Bot: @shudong123bot 误封解封: @tuhuotu 搜索🔍机器人: @soushudongbot 网站:https://shudong888.com/ |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 65 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chxpd |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 02:59 | 157,324 | +83 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 14:50 | 157,241 | +28 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 07:56 | 157,213 | +66 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 04:11 | 157,147 | +39 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 06:56 | 157,108 | +57 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 06:09 | 157,051 | +40 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 06:49 | 157,011 | +77 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 06:31 | 156,934 | +55 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 09:35 | 156,879 | +97 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 08:09 | 156,782 | +60 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 06:29 | 156,722 | +69 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 09:19 | 156,653 | +30 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 05:58 | 156,623 | +84 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 03:46 | 156,539 | +98 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 23:56 | 156,441 | +76 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 22:46 | 156,365 | +28 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 01:47 | 156,337 | +67 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 22:19 | 156,270 | +39 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:37 | 156,231 | +45 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 16:37 | 156,186 | first reading |
207 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 198 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 207 (25 July 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,317,080 |
| Reactions total | 3,051 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 16:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
12,799 reactions across 207 posts, in 64 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤡 | 2,947 | 23.0% | |
| ❤ | 2,446 | 19.1% | |
| 👍 | 1,870 | 14.6% | |
| 🤣 | 803 | 6.27% | |
| 🤮 | 627 | 4.90% | |
| 😢 | 588 | 4.59% | |
| 😁 | 504 | 3.94% | |
| 😭 | 384 | 3.00% | |
| 🖕 | 357 | 2.79% | |
| 👾 | 333 | 2.60% | |
| 🌚 | 220 | 1.72% | |
| 🤬 | 199 | 1.55% | |
| 😱 | 114 | 0.891% | |
| 😈 | 95 | 0.742% | |
| 🕊 | 92 | 0.719% | |
| 👀 | 89 | 0.695% | |
| 🌭 | 70 | 0.547% | |
| 🤔 | 65 | 0.508% | |
| 🤷♀ | 62 | 0.484% | |
| ⚡ | 61 | 0.477% | |
| 44 further kinds | 873 | 6.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 207 of the 207 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,799 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 207 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 76 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
今年我媳妇本命年,她说过的很苦。岳父几年确诊了肝癌,我媳妇在8月份又被电诈了10000。 其实啊,我也想说我过得也很苦,上班没存下来钱,各方方面面今年钱也没有了。明天还要去买岳父的丧葬品,后续还有我媳妇那边的白事。真的是,到处都是难处,实在不想在对媳妇倾诉了,她已经够累了。唉😔
👍8❤3🤔1
年轻人是越早进入股市越好,还是干脆不炒股好,目前已经亏了两三个了,还要继续吗😭缅A
❤6👍4
19,之前也不努力考上的高中很普通,读了一学期高中肄业了。游戏技术不错靠代打维持生计了一年多,当时认知不成熟,有点小钱网上经常乱给别人花钱也没存到钱。 越来越觉得网络的消耗,舍弃了游戏去了解自己,也渐渐与所有朋友失去了联系。健身读书学英语最初觉得是向上走后来觉得自欺欺人在逃避赚钱这件事。现在在小农村窝着啃老重复着一下无关紧要的小事,有时候又想大学生活是什么样的?又有些向往。不愿干脏活累活,有好奇心欲望又不够强烈,驱动力又很看当下的状态,最近堕落的天天撸又有点迷惘了。各位大佬有没有可以指点迷津的?想靠执行力赚点钱
❤1👍1
我在公司实习,住在安排的员工宿舍里面。因为周末双休,周五晚上我打算通宵打游戏,可以打到凌晨1点半的时候,微信收到了隔壁领居的好友申请(她通过物业群找到我的微信),附带的消息是让我别吵了打扰到她休息。我好心累,拧巴。一方面觉得对方很顾及我的面子,没有直接在物业群里面艾特我让我闭嘴,也没有直接敲我的门让我闭嘴。一方面我又觉得我也没有做很过分的事情,只是想在周五晚上打个游戏而已,为什么连这点自由都没有啊🥹 via master P
🤡54🖕7😁5❤4🌚3👍3🤬3💊1
今天上午新生体检,我当志愿者看新生抽血,有好几个女生抽血的时候直接晕倒,我在旁边赶紧接住,拖住的是背,感觉挺爽的。一种是帮助人很有一种成就感,还有就是和女生肢体接触很爽。有些女生的声音也很温柔,太爽了。 有些新生打扮的真的挺漂亮的,看了一上午。
🤮67🤡26😁14🌚5❤4🎅3👍2☃1
今天是去咖啡店上班的第一天,好多漂亮大姐姐,都好有耐心好温柔,好开心,好喜欢... via eira.wav
🤮14👀8🤣3
24年毕业,靠着投机取巧和运气成分,跌跌撞撞的考上了大学和进入了央企实习,我一直认为人生易如反掌,高中天天玩不写作业照样能靠艺术上大学,大学天天不去上课天天玩照样专业对口央企入职,内心优越感十足,觉得自己容貌姣好,大事不掉链子,谁也瞧不上,紧接着我的教训就来了,在签订正式劳动合同之前公司体检说明血常规异常,等到查明原因治疗结束之后已错过入职时间,公司不予安排,心怀着一口气想着我定要闯出一片天地,年后去了深圳,看到1500块只能租在南山城中村里的握手楼棺材房里时,落差感席满全身(搞笑的是实习的时候看到这些城中村还在调侃说住在这真是一辈子忘不到头)两个月后坚持不下去回到了家乡,现在阴差阳错的在证券公司,没客户没业绩只能底薪度日 现在的我马上满24了无存款负债大几千,身体不怕你们笑话还有点早泄,也早已没了自信心,慢慢的也懒得把自己收拾的精精神神了,至此我的生活大方向我还没看见,还没稳定下来,已经慢慢的有点麻木了,充斥着无力感
❤8🤮8😭5🤓3👍1
我今年23刚大学毕业没多久,家庭条件一般,自己家没有负债,别人欠我爸钱,但是很难还,家里父亲身体不好,需要4万块钱治病,我刚出来工作几个月没什么钱,这些年亲戚朋友都不容易,借亲戚借朋友只借到了几千,自己查了网上的借贷平台,花呗1800,抖音1000,京东800,就是想搞钱,我不是很在乎征信,因为我爸对我感情很深,想请问各位网友,有没有什么办法可以搞钱
🥰5❤3👍3🤷♀2🌚1🤷♂1😡1
最近收到一个炸裂的消息,我前妻跟一个所谓的好兄弟搞一起去了,吃了自己的一个瓜,虽然离婚了,但是听到这个消息 ,还是震惊,堵得慌, 不知道该做些什么,虽然现在与我无关, 但是有感觉自己像个傻逼,有那么一瞬间都起了杀心了 艹
🤡27😢4👌2👏2🐳1👍1😁1
我现在读大学,在这个期间接触到了基督徒,他们给我传教,我开始觉得是传销,后面发现他们挺好的,很善良,也就慢慢接受了,但是心里还是不能接受,只是去蹭蹭饭,主日也回去,但是真的听不进去。然后他们还回去给其他学生传道,后面被学校发现了,我被警告了。我不想去了,但是他们后面又来找我,我该怎么办
👍18🤣8🥰5❤3🤡3🤷1
Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_8214953027
❤3🌭1👍1
今年19岁,刚从上一份工作离职 每天浑浑噩噩的,家里的生意欠债400个 房子和车都要被银行收回,父母也离婚了。以前我自己炒黄金加打工感觉日子还有点盼头。前段时间金价破四千大关 我爆仓了,现在一无所有。手机一顿饭都吃不起。。没钱没关系没经验没能力我是不是只能混吃等死了,工作真难找啊 上飞机有没有大哥能推荐个活 最好不需要押金的,来点快钱就行,饭吃不起了
☃3👏3❤1👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 207 posts we hold for @chxpd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 1 post on @chxpd as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“秘密小频道(树洞)” (@chxpd), 157,324 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chxpd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.