Channel
@chxpd
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
154,481subscribers
+3,537 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001874387876 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chxpd |
| Description | 匿名或带用户名投稿自己的秘密，忏悔，后悔，内心感触或过错行为等等，请勿投稿以下内容：字数太短，复制别人的帖子，编造，带节奏，色情，恐怖，个人身份信息等等，友情频道： @fa_dian 投稿Bot: @shudong123bot 误封解封： @tuhuotu 搜索🔍机器人： @soushudongbot 网站：https://shudong888.com/ |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chxpd |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 05:41 | 154,481 | +176 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 10:40 | 154,305 | +190 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:02 | 154,115 | +143 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:58 | 153,972 | +114 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 21:01 | 153,858 | +209 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 153,649 | +271 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 01:58 | 153,378 | +126 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 01:20 | 153,252 | +108 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:44 | 153,144 | +34 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:48 | 153,110 | +36 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 153,074 | +102 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 152,972 | +81 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 152,891 | +43 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:06 | 152,848 | +43 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 152,805 | +118 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 152,687 | +122 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:11 | 152,565 | +72 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:24 | 152,493 | +118 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:12 | 152,375 | +144 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 152,231 | first reading |
104 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 104 (25 July 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,265,540 |
| Reactions total | 3,232 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 09:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
7,507 reactions across 104 posts, in 56 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤡 | 1,839 | 24.5% | |
| ❤ | 1,517 | 20.2% | |
| 👍 | 690 | 9.19% | |
| 🤣 | 637 | 8.49% | |
| 😢 | 394 | 5.25% | |
| 🤮 | 367 | 4.89% | |
| 👾 | 297 | 3.96% | |
| 😁 | 291 | 3.88% | |
| 😭 | 252 | 3.36% | |
| 🖕 | 223 | 2.97% | |
| 🌚 | 90 | 1.20% | |
| 🤬 | 87 | 1.16% | |
| 😱 | 77 | 1.03% | |
| 🌭 | 54 | 0.719% | |
| 🤔 | 49 | 0.653% | |
| 🤷 | 49 | 0.653% | |
| 👀 | 45 | 0.599% | |
| 💊 | 41 | 0.546% | |
| 🥴 | 41 | 0.546% | |
| 🕊 | 40 | 0.533% | |
| 36 further kinds | 427 | 5.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 104 of the 104 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,507 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 104 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
投稿一下，昨天中秋节，养了四个月的小狗（七个月，三个月的时候买的）被我打死了，因为它在乱吃屎和家里乱拉，我女朋友看到我打死了特别生气一直哭，然后我陪她去宠物火化，现在还躺着生我的气，在恨我，我对这只狗也很愧疚，我不是不喜欢这只狗，当时我确实看到它乱拉乱吃之后还往房里跑，现在不知道怎么办了，我准备让她一个人在房间里静一静，问题她又冲动消费，花俩万三买了18pm的2tb，因为昨天生气把手机后壳摔烂了，我问为什么摔，她说没找到我的，摔我的管她屁事，我也很难受，真的，她说还有一些恶毒的话不想说出来，我们已经订完婚准备在明年结婚了，婚纱照也定好了，但是我感觉我们走不长远了
🤬48🖕24🤡7❤6🤷5😁5👾2🌭1
和老婆结果6，7年了，以前都能看老婆手机，最近发现上锁了，而且还经常删聊天记录，是不是出轨了啊，上周，晚上9点半和一个男性朋友出去聊天，我查定位是在一个小区的车位，然后发信息问她，她也如实说了，说在车里和朋友聊聊天，然后10点半回的家，查看行车记录仪发现删掉了，只有一秒的画面，群友们帮忙看看有没有问题啊，
🤡150❤8👍7🌚2👾2🌭1💔1😁1
我老婆平时挺保守的，今天去万达广场玩，穿得稍微性感一点，低领露了些乳沟。刚好碰上遇上她的男同事，于是寒暄两句，男同事聊天目光就没离开过她的胸部，说话也问非所答，心不在焉。乘扶手电梯到下一层的时候，故意让我们先走，他跟在我们后面，所以站得比我们高，站在后面举着手玩手机。下来后，我看见男同事的裤裆好像鼓了起来了。
🤣46❤39🤡26👍8😁3👾2🌭1🖕1
Telegram必备的搜索引擎，极搜JISOU帮你精准找到，想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_8214953027
❤5👍2🤮2
兄弟们，天塌了，去年肌酐157，今天查242，肾衰竭3期，真tm命运弄人，上天就没给我开个窗，1型糖尿病，身高只有145cm，一直受人眼光，努力读书，考了个医学研究生，并顺利毕业，嘿，你猜怎么了，并发症来了，自己还有慢性乙肝，我才29岁啊，要是血透，我真的没有努力下去勇气了，没有什么牵挂，我还能干嘛？等死算了。好想哭。
😢84❤19😁4🥱3👾2🌭1👍1
匿名，心里好难受，因为我伤害了一个很温柔的女孩。 我们两人是经过朋友介绍认识的，第一次打电话给她，电话那头就传来一个细声细语的声音，很柔和，我简单介绍了一下我自己，和她约好了餐厅去见面。见面聊天过程中，我发现女孩很爱笑，一笑起来她的牙齿都会露出来，我也不由自主地想笑。跟她聊天特别舒服，她微信发完消息后面都会跟着一个可爱的表情包。 后面约了几次饭，她每次都化了美美的妆，在车上就和我讲她单位里发生的事，然后笑起来。接触了几次，我后面送了她化妆品，她也回了我一个价值差不多的鼠标，虽然不是很贵，但也让我的心里暖暖的，她对我总是很包容，出去玩我没规划好行程也不会责怪我，只是默默地跟着我 可是我却把她对我的包容当作是理所应当，我对她变得冷漠敷衍，聊天只回复简单几个字，觉得她配不上我，最后我提出结束关系 现在想想，我真TM的有病，把一个人的真心对待不当回事，让善良温柔的人受伤，成了自己最讨厌的渣男，如果能时间倒流…
🤮98❤21🖕20🌚5🤣3😁3👀2👾2
研究所读研被老师压榨到没办法。从7月份到研究所开始就让你疯狂加班7-8月简直就没有一个完整的周末，随时24小时待命。傻逼老师半夜三更都可以给你打电话喊你给他改报告。现在快到中秋了，中秋法定节假日不给休息，强制要求加班。求求怎么办！！！
👾8❤4😴2👍1
投稿,bro们，帮我参考参考，大专英语老师帮我找到一个挺有实力的企业实习，而且这个老师人脉也广，之前送过500元的土特产，中秋节想给送三张1k的山姆储蓄卡，这个数应该差不多吧， 搞盒月饼，塞封信，信里边装卡，外边拿快递盒封上，放老师办公室地上，微信说声送盒月饼还有信，这样就差不多了吧
👍40❤11😁5🌚4👾3
真是没想到自己以前小学到初中一直都是被别人甩锅的，初中那个多媒体大屏反复开机重启又赖我，拉电闸那个人一点事都没有，被老师留下扫地和另一个同学，也是被孤立到一个朋友都没有，唉
👍14☃4👾2😁2
［匿名］最近能感觉自己逐渐越来越冷漠了，小时候和青少年时期我是一个很热心的人，喜欢帮助和分享，但由于出身相对贫困，长相又丑，没人愿意听我的观点和想法，常常发生热脸贴冷屁股的情况，哪怕事后证明我的一些理念是对的，工作这几年我也延续这种方式沟通，时常传授经验，但同事们尤其是年轻的同事只是一味地看不起我，哪怕他们眼睁睁看着没用我的方案的项目胎死，逐渐我理解了没有付出代价的结果是不会被珍惜这句话，所以我无论是工作还是对日常，我都没有再屁颠屁颠自以为是地主动帮助他人了，这让我的心境变得平和了，但也使我感觉自己变得越来越背离了自己的“核心存在”，就好像自己变成了小时候害怕的大人那样
❤24😁5🌚3👍2👾2
匿名投稿，我22岁，刚大学毕业，考研失败了，找工作也找不到满意的，感觉找个班上吧也没啥意思，试岗前甚至恶心地吐，不知道想要什么。女朋友也因为各种原因跟我分手，已经抑郁一个月了，甚至有的时候会躯体化，想不明白，也接受不了，一直振作不起来，做任何事都是三分钟热度，根本坚持不下去。在外面飘着，住青旅，有人还在床位上抽烟外放视频，回去吧，又接受不了老一辈一直输出的观点，想找前女友聊聊也一直被攻击和否定，自我怀疑加习得性无助，根本想不明白为什么。普普通通，家里帮不了大忙，自己也没那么努力，更没那么聪明，真不知道怎么办了
🖕8😁8❤5😢5👍2👾2
我这平民还能干嘛？能吃好，睡饱，无病痛，就很不错了，应该追求更好的吗？还是自寻烦恼？ via ok ok
👍29❤9👾3😁3💊2🌚1
Showing the 12 most recent of 104 posts we hold for @chxpd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“秘密小频道(树洞）” (@chxpd), 154,481 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chxpd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.