Channel
@LegionTon
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,750subscribers
-33 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001839512518 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LegionTon |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LegionTon |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 7,750 | -27 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:50 | 7,777 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:00 | 7,783 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:59 | 7,783 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
268 reactions across 18 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 132 | 49.3% | |
| 🔥 | 46 | 17.2% | |
| 😁 | 25 | 9.33% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 3.36% | |
| 🥴 | 9 | 3.36% | |
| 🎉 | 8 | 2.99% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 2.24% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 1.87% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 1.87% | |
| 🗿 | 4 | 1.49% | |
| 😡 | 4 | 1.49% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 1.49% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 1.12% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 1.12% | |
| 😈 | 2 | 0.746% | |
| 😐 | 2 | 0.746% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 0.373% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 268reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 January 2025 to 9 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @LegionTon. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 January 2025 to 9 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
В сети TON💎 вышло важное обновление! Ранее интервал выпуска блоков был порядка 2.5 секунд, а после голосования будет 400 миллисекунд, что в 6.25 раз чаще. Но с этим всем, и выросла инфляция, с 0.6% до ~4% Сооснователь TON💎 Макасов уже поспешил оправдаться, что в Солане и Аптосе и других сетях тоже инфляция не маленькая, под 3-4%, и это норм. Но, есть важный нюанс.🤔 Инфляция считается от текущей эмиссии, а значит…
👍9❤6
А представьте художников Которые рисуют уровни и тому подобное Как они сегодня охуели, если стояли в лонгах Все, что альта — просто лицом в коровью лепеху полетело В такие дни, часть людей просто обнуляется @LegionTon
👍12😱4😢3
А если взять на примере Евы Вот сделали ваучеры, и сразу 5% роялти стоит у них То есть как бы раздали дроп (номинально), но 5% налога с вас сразу забирается, какой в этом смысл? Сейчас как я понимаю, нет механизма условно «отложенного роялти» Но мне кажется это здравая мысль, а то как то странно получается, дроп раздали, а чтобы продать заплати с него 5% ))🤷♂️🤔 В общем Еву не виню) так все делают да и не думает …
👍6
Вот и стартовал неожиданный проект от Dedust — x1000.finance А самое забавное, что они заставили вернуться Legion😅 Идем разбираться вместе, а потом ожидайте новые посты 🌐 @LegionTon
🔥6👍3🤩2
Новая кампания от xRocket — участвовать Распределяем 5000 USDT и 1000000 EvaXP
👍8🔥5❤1🗿1
В xRocket появилась функция чтобы делать дашборды Просто пишите @xrocket dash btc ton xrock и закрепляете в чате\канале Просто вписываете интересные вам токены Удобно следить за курсами онлайн) Пользуйтесь
🔥5👍3
LEGION pinned «🪙 85 631.2$ 🪙 3.70$ 🪙 0.0274$ 🪙 BTC 85 631.2$ 📈 +4.39% 🪙 TON 3.70$ 📈 +3.25% 🪙 XROCK 0.0274$ 📈 +3.04% »
🪙 85 631.2$ 🪙 3.70$ 🪙 0.0274$ 🪙 BTC 85 631.2$ 📈 +4.39% 🪙 TON 3.70$ 📈 +3.25% 🪙 XROCK 0.0274$ 📈 +3.04%
Говорят надо будет выиграть в гонке в их игре, в общем дичь) Сервера игры решили не готовить к такой нагрузке UPD пароль на трансляции через пару минут UPD2 чек активирован, пароль показали на стриме в трансляции
👍3🤩1
🚀 Rocket-чек на 125000 USDT (125 000.0$) с паролем Внутри чека: 1000 активация(й) по 100 USDT (100.0$) с реферальной наградой 25 USDT (25.0$) 💬 Пароль в 22:30 по мск в https://t.me/chatmetasiliense
👍4🗿2😱1
💰 НОВЫЙ AIRDROP ОТ HOLD 💰 Сегодня ночью внезапно запустили HOLD — приложение, которое раздает награды просто за хранение токенов на вашем кошельке! 📌 Как это работает? Механика похожа на EARN, но без сезонов. Учитывается период удержания токенов в прошлом, поэтому, если вы раньше хранили активы, получите еще больше HODL. Обеспечение идет за счет партнерств — звучит клево 😁 🔥 Какие токены учитываются? ❌ Ликвидность…
🔥4👍3❤1
КАК ТОНКИПЕР НАС ГРАБИТ Хочу затронуть важную тему, как разрушается (имхо) экономика приложений Наверняка многие используют Тонкипер-браузер для торгов, но знали ли вы, что все новые кошельки, оформляются по рефералке Тонкипера? Ранее чтобы быть на «витрине» Тонкипера, нужно было платить немалые деньги, а сейчас, Тонкипер видимо придумал новый способ заработать Некоторые приложения пошли дальше всех🤬, и дали Тонк…
👍13🥴7😐2🗿1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @LegionTon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 773,736 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LEGION” (@LegionTon), 7,750 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LegionTon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.