Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

На тон выше

@TonUP_SRP

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,993subscribers

-60 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001680566771
TypeChannel
Username@TonUP_SRP
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TonUP_SRP

Growth

13,99314,05314,0237 August 2026 — 14,053 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,053 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,052 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,040 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,026 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,025 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,015 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,000 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,993 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 6 days, net -60. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,984–14,062 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 07:3413,993-7
12 Aug 2026, 06:5214,000-15
11 Aug 2026, 04:1814,015-10
10 Aug 2026, 04:5214,025-1
9 Aug 2026, 07:5414,026-14
8 Aug 2026, 09:3214,040-12
7 Aug 2026, 11:3814,052-1
7 Aug 2026, 05:3014,053no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:2314,053first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 8 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.43%
avg views ÷ 13,993 subscribers
Avg views / post
620
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held21 (8 May 20267 August 2026)
Views total4,963
Reactions total69
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 02:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
28s
Average length
2s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

188 reactions across 21 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6836.2%
3920.7%
😁2513.3%
🔥189.57%
136.91%
42.13%
👏42.13%
💯42.13%
👎21.06%
🤨21.06%
🎉10.532%
🏆10.532%
👌10.532%
💩10.532%
🤣10.532%
🤪10.532%
🤬10.532%
🥱10.532%
🥴10.532%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 188reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
24
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 21 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TonUP_SRP. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC274 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Никогда раньше такого не было и вот опять Черный пиар, тоже пиар. Через месяц про детали забудут — предмет разговора останется в головах @TonUP_SRP

👍5

4 Aug 2026, 03:36 UTC885 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Появились скриншоты где поддержки Apple утверждает, что Telegram был удален самими разработчиками Это объясняет, почему приложение осталось доступно на Mac App Store, а push-ы доходили На фоне пропажи приложений, цену пролили до $1,29 но довольно быстро откупили Ждём анонс новой фичи для пампа?

👍41

4 Aug 2026, 01:28 UTC425 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

😁4👍1

2 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC451 views16 reactions10 Starsread 13 August 2026
Video

Что изменит Gram Wallet? Часть вещей уже прослеживается в текущих обновлениях, часть — мои предположения на основе того, что есть 👛 Два кошелька телеграм Gram Wallet станет полноценным некастодиальным кошельком, а Wallet больше будет позиционироваться как криптобиржа При этом оба, вероятно, останутся внутри меню Telegram. Wallet (от TOP) там где сейчас, а Gram Wallet под балансом Stars — Мои Gram 🧽 Подпись без р

👍84🔥3😁1

1 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC405 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👏4👍2🤣1

29 Jul 2026, 15:11 UTC796 views9 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Video

Telegram обновляет движок стикеров Telegram, похоже, готовит серьезное обновление своей графической инфраструктуры — tlottie ❓ Что такое Lottie? Lottie — это формат векторных анимаций, который позволяет создавать сложную графику без тяжелых видеофайлов. Большинство приложений используют готовые Lottie-библиотеки, но Telegram, похоже, решил создать собственный движок, заточенный под свои задачи. ⬆️ Что происходит

62👍1

21 Jul 2026, 16:18 UTC≈1,020 views15 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

TON готовят к новому циклу Дуров анонсировал Gram Wallet прямо внутри Telegram. Но интереснее здесь не сам кошелек, а то, что экосистема постепенно собирается в единое целое — без лишних прослоек При этом видно, что команда Telegram старается выпускать крупные анонсы на сильном рынке. На фоне новости Gram прибавил около 9% (если не учитывать давление продаж со стороны ранних майнеров). ⬆️ Думаю, новый цикл мы увид

933

16 Jul 2026, 10:17 UTC707 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

AirDrop от TONxDAO Помните приложение Ton DAO? Команда готовится к проведению AirDrop Вместо TON идут на Solan-у — разошлось видение с... кто там сейчас Ton Foundation. Официальных деталей о листинге пока нет У меня аллокация только на 1 из 3 аккаунтов, а остальных Not Eligible, хотя $DAO подфармлены на всех, поэтому критерии отбора не понятны Как проверить eligibility: 🟢Идти в приложение — оттуда отправит в нов

👍321🥱1

14 Jul 2026, 09:28 UTC≈1,290 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

UPD по t.me По информации telelkel, блокировка домена t.me произошла по требованию OFAC OFAC — подразделение Минфина США, отвечающее за санкционный режим Контролирует соблюдение санкций американскими компаниями и организациями, подпадающими под юрисдикцию США Почему могли применить ограничения: 🟢Связь с подсанкционными лицами 🟢Нарушения санкционных требований OFAC 🟢Исполнение непубличного требования регулятора

41🔥1😁1

13 Jul 2026, 21:20 UTC≈1,420 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

MTONGA? ⬆️ Сначала упала сеть TON. Теперь не открываются ссылки t.me ❓ Интересное совпадение.. @TonUP_SRP

👍2🤨2🤪1

12 Jul 2026, 18:20 UTC611 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Что там с подарками Telegram и MTONGA 5? Наверное, это потому что я не до конца зумер, я не понимаю прикола с «MTONGA» также как с SixSeven. Хотя нет, с SixSeven понимаю ❓ Наверняка уже слышали про обновление с Communities Если нет — кратко: это что-то среднее между папкой с чатами и группой с подтемами. По сути, единое сообщество, состоящие из групп и каналов — аналог Discord Функция уже есть в бете. А сам Павел

😁51👍1

10 Jul 2026, 16:34 UTC719 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Не торгуй фьючерсами в Wallet Заканчивается второй сезон бонусов Wallet. Вот главный вывод — Не торгуйте фьючерсами, а особенно в Wallet При этом это не значит, что Wallet — плохой продукт. Купить крипту, продать, отправить другу в Telegram — максимально удобно. Но фьючерсы — нет... 👛 Комиссии Wallet берет 0.09% за сделку, для сравнения: Bybit — 0.02–0.055%. MEXC — во время акций комиссии бывают еще ниже. При э

👍41💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @TonUP_SRP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 396,195 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Wutmu о TON
@WutmuTon · 129,679
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 August 2026
TonDreamer
@TonDreamerr · 169,396
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“На тон выше” (@TonUP_SRP), 13,993 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TonUP_SRP.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.